香港人根本絕大部分都係漢人

之係潮汕人唔似廣東人?

證據呢

黃俄賤種學人講漢族文化

係咁問題係你講既所謂事實係謬論呢
你覺得唔岩既又唔反駁返人?

照你邏輯，美國人根本絕大部分都係英國人？

美國人本來夠唔係原居民啦，你試下去美國稱呼佢哋做 British 英國人睇下會有咩反應？

WFC

咩鳩漢人？根本係將唔同嘅種族夾硬group埋一齊

歷史上中原人大量南遷係事實

第一批南遷的中原人就有五十萬，其中最多的是「賈人」，就是做買賣的人。秦始皇不但強制商人南遷，還將他們的親屬，甚至祖父輩經過商的人也一律趕到嶺南。

第二批強制南遷的中原人也有好幾萬，大多是築城的民工，以及對朝廷不滿的人。

第三批中原人南遷時，已經是趙佗在廣州建立南越國了，秦二世要一萬五千名中原女子遷徙嶺南，與當時留在嶺南的秦軍官兵成立家庭，就是要中原的將士紮根在嶺南。

事實與秦二世的想法正好相反，落籍於南海諸郡的中原商人、工匠和駐軍，同當時的「南蠻」越族人友好相處，使嶺南的經濟日益發展和強大。

西漢後，中原人南遷有多種形式，貴族官僚的流放是其中一種。當時，凡是西漢統治集團內部傾軋的失敗者，都被強遷南下。更多的南遷緣起中原人民逃避戰亂，這就形成了秦漢以後移民南遷的又一高潮。

從三國混戰時期起，一批又一批的中原人從陸路和海路進入嶺南，嶺南成了避亂安居的理想之地。中原人南遷給廣州等地增加了大批人口，以南海郡爲例，公元2年爲94,258人，到公元140年，爲250,282人增長約166%。可見那時的外來移民規模有多大。

秦漢這四百年間陸續南遷的中原移民，給嶺南人帶來了先進的生產技術和多方面的文化科學知識，加速了漢越民族的融合，對廣州地區經濟的開發起了關鍵的作用。在廣州市郊出土的文物顯示，晉代的廣州，農耕區不斷向山地和河谷平原拓展，廣州出現種植蔬菜的田地，珠江三角洲已經向水面擴展耕地，鐵農具和牛耕推廣，精耕細作取代了粗放經營。

所謂越族只係一堆部落統稱
根本未發展到一個文明就比人趕走
唔係離開就係混種

接受現實啦
你地根本就係漢人

咪就係

訓啦柒頭

唔好講咁多,你其實係非洲人,
所有地球人都係非洲人

一句：新加坡人口七成華族，都係走難過去或者去經商之後落地生根，華族又好，漢人又好，so？

玩DNA？
之前五毛復興條柒頭先玩完
而家又loop？

Source: Chen, J., Zheng, H., Bei, J.-X., Sun, L., Jia, W., Li, T., … Liu, J. (2009). Genetic Structure of the Han Chinese Population Revealed by Genome-wide SNP Variation. American Journal of Human Genetics, 85(6), 775–785. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.016


Figure 1: Population Stratification of the Han Chinese

The PCA plots were oriented with PC1 on the y axis and with PC2 on the x axis. These plots were obtained by using all 107,565 SNPs.

(A) The cluster and stratification of the samples from the ten provinces of China, showing an evident north-south genetic differentiation.

(B) The samples from Beijing (purple) (CHB samples from the International HapMap project), Shanghai (orange), and Singapore (yellow) were compared against the provincial samples. The majority of the Singapore samples fall in the southern (lower) sector, whereas the Beijing and Shanghai samples were largely located within the northern (upper) sector.

(C) The three dialect groups from the Guangdong province were shown against all of the Han Chinese samples from the ten provinces. There was stratification among the three dialect groups, along the same north-south trend observed for the overall Han Chinese.

Figure 1嘅3個panels (A, B, C)已經睇到廣東人嘅基因組成同北方漢人唔同
而且相當集中返喺廣東 唔係好喺其他地方搵到



Figure 2: Comparison between the Geographic Map of China and the Genetic Structure of the Han Chinese

The PCA plots of the provincial samples are superimposed on the map of China to show the general north-south trend across China.

Figure 2 直頭畫埋你睇廣東人嘅基因結構同廣東以北嘅漢人基因結構係明顯唔同



Figure 3: Estimated Population Structure by STRUCTURE for K = 2 and K = 3

Each individual is represented by a thin vertical line, and each province is demarcated by a thick vertical black line. The provinces are arranged from north to south, with JPT on the extreme left, representing the northernmost locality, to Liaoning, the northernmost province of China investigated in this study. The Guangdong individuals were grouped into the three dialect groups of Teochew, Hakka and Cantonese. These were then followed by the samples from the two metropolitan cities of Beijing (represented by CHB) and Shanghai, as well as the overseas Chinese community in Singapore. In K = 2, the northern provinces are clearly anchored by the JPT, with a huge membership of northern samples (represented by the yellow segment). The northern membership decreases gradually down to the southern provinces, which show a strong membership of southern samples (represented by the brown segment). At K = 3, JPT is clearly separated from the Han Chinese samples. The analysis revealed a demarcation of north-central-south similar to that shown by Figure 2. The Beijing, Shanghai and Singapore samples showed a clear mixture of southern (long brown lines) and northern (shorter brown lines) individuals, as compared to the provincial samples. The three dialect samples from the Guangdong province were also different from each other, with Teochew being more similar to individuals from the provinces of Hunan and Cantonese being the most southern representative.

CHB係北京人
Figure 3 一睇已經睇到廣東人同北方漢人嘅基因有幾大分別
有趣嘅係日本人(JPT)同北方漢人喺基因上係幾接近

漢你碌撚

點睇，教下我巴打，睇下d唐朝妹dna

人地都冇研究唐朝人

係 但北方係胡人滿人

講咁多都係冇撚用
用返你地最愛嘅血統論：

Source: Chen, J., Zheng, H., Bei, J.-X., Sun, L., Jia, W., Li, T., … Liu, J. (2009). Genetic Structure of the Han Chinese Population Revealed by Genome-wide SNP Variation. American Journal of Human Genetics, 85(6), 775–785. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.016


Figure 1: Population Stratification of the Han Chinese

The PCA plots were oriented with PC1 on the y axis and with PC2 on the x axis. These plots were obtained by using all 107,565 SNPs.

(A) The cluster and stratification of the samples from the ten provinces of China, showing an evident north-south genetic differentiation.

(B) The samples from Beijing (purple) (CHB samples from the International HapMap project), Shanghai (orange), and Singapore (yellow) were compared against the provincial samples. The majority of the Singapore samples fall in the southern (lower) sector, whereas the Beijing and Shanghai samples were largely located within the northern (upper) sector.

(C) The three dialect groups from the Guangdong province were shown against all of the Han Chinese samples from the ten provinces. There was stratification among the three dialect groups, along the same north-south trend observed for the overall Han Chinese.

Figure 1嘅3個panels (A, B, C)已經睇到廣東人嘅基因組成同北方漢人唔同
而且相當集中返喺廣東 唔係好喺其他地方搵到



Figure 2: Comparison between the Geographic Map of China and the Genetic Structure of the Han Chinese

The PCA plots of the provincial samples are superimposed on the map of China to show the general north-south trend across China.

Figure 2 直頭畫埋你睇廣東人嘅基因結構同廣東以北嘅漢人基因結構係明顯唔同



Figure 3: Estimated Population Structure by STRUCTURE for K = 2 and K = 3

Each individual is represented by a thin vertical line, and each province is demarcated by a thick vertical black line. The provinces are arranged from north to south, with JPT on the extreme left, representing the northernmost locality, to Liaoning, the northernmost province of China investigated in this study. The Guangdong individuals were grouped into the three dialect groups of Teochew, Hakka and Cantonese. These were then followed by the samples from the two metropolitan cities of Beijing (represented by CHB) and Shanghai, as well as the overseas Chinese community in Singapore. In K = 2, the northern provinces are clearly anchored by the JPT, with a huge membership of northern samples (represented by the yellow segment). The northern membership decreases gradually down to the southern provinces, which show a strong membership of southern samples (represented by the brown segment). At K = 3, JPT is clearly separated from the Han Chinese samples. The analysis revealed a demarcation of north-central-south similar to that shown by Figure 2. The Beijing, Shanghai and Singapore samples showed a clear mixture of southern (long brown lines) and northern (shorter brown lines) individuals, as compared to the provincial samples. The three dialect samples from the Guangdong province were also different from each other, with Teochew being more similar to individuals from the provinces of Hunan and Cantonese being the most southern representative.

CHB係北京人
Figure 3 一睇已經睇到廣東人同北方漢人嘅基因有幾大分別
有趣嘅係日本人(JPT)同北方漢人喺基因上係幾接近

漢你碌撚

你收皮啦
屌哂你祖宗十八代
屌埋你d漢人親戚

玩DNA？
之前五毛復興條柒頭先玩完
而家又loop？

Source: Chen, J., Zheng, H., Bei, J.-X., Sun, L., Jia, W., Li, T., … Liu, J. (2009). Genetic Structure of the Han Chinese Population Revealed by Genome-wide SNP Variation. American Journal of Human Genetics, 85(6), 775–785. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.016


Figure 1: Population Stratification of the Han Chinese

The PCA plots were oriented with PC1 on the y axis and with PC2 on the x axis. These plots were obtained by using all 107,565 SNPs.

(A) The cluster and stratification of the samples from the ten provinces of China, showing an evident north-south genetic differentiation.

(B) The samples from Beijing (purple) (CHB samples from the International HapMap project), Shanghai (orange), and Singapore (yellow) were compared against the provincial samples. The majority of the Singapore samples fall in the southern (lower) sector, whereas the Beijing and Shanghai samples were largely located within the northern (upper) sector.

(C) The three dialect groups from the Guangdong province were shown against all of the Han Chinese samples from the ten provinces. There was stratification among the three dialect groups, along the same north-south trend observed for the overall Han Chinese.

Figure 1嘅3個panels (A, B, C)已經睇到廣東人嘅基因組成同北方漢人唔同
而且相當集中返喺廣東 唔係好喺其他地方搵到



Figure 2: Comparison between the Geographic Map of China and the Genetic Structure of the Han Chinese

The PCA plots of the provincial samples are superimposed on the map of China to show the general north-south trend across China.

Figure 2 直頭畫埋你睇廣東人嘅基因結構同廣東以北嘅漢人基因結構係明顯唔同



Figure 3: Estimated Population Structure by STRUCTURE for K = 2 and K = 3

Each individual is represented by a thin vertical line, and each province is demarcated by a thick vertical black line. The provinces are arranged from north to south, with JPT on the extreme left, representing the northernmost locality, to Liaoning, the northernmost province of China investigated in this study. The Guangdong individuals were grouped into the three dialect groups of Teochew, Hakka and Cantonese. These were then followed by the samples from the two metropolitan cities of Beijing (represented by CHB) and Shanghai, as well as the overseas Chinese community in Singapore. In K = 2, the northern provinces are clearly anchored by the JPT, with a huge membership of northern samples (represented by the yellow segment). The northern membership decreases gradually down to the southern provinces, which show a strong membership of southern samples (represented by the brown segment). At K = 3, JPT is clearly separated from the Han Chinese samples. The analysis revealed a demarcation of north-central-south similar to that shown by Figure 2. The Beijing, Shanghai and Singapore samples showed a clear mixture of southern (long brown lines) and northern (shorter brown lines) individuals, as compared to the provincial samples. The three dialect samples from the Guangdong province were also different from each other, with Teochew being more similar to individuals from the provinces of Hunan and Cantonese being the most southern representative.

CHB係北京人
Figure 3 一睇已經睇到廣東人同北方漢人嘅基因有幾大分別
有趣嘅係日本人(JPT)同北方漢人喺基因上係幾接近

漢你碌撚

點睇，教下我巴打，睇下d唐朝妹dna

人地都冇研究唐朝人

日本人=我心目中唐朝人