政府豁免主要適用於法定要求，而非普通法下的侵權責任。若政府部門（如食環署）在火災事故中被證明違反謹慎責任，豁免並不能完全免除其責任。例如，若骨灰龕未有安裝足夠的消防設施，且此疏忽直接導致火災損害，政府可能被判承擔疏忽責任。
Statutory standards may have a bearing on the determination of the standard of care in a negligence action. If there is legislation stipulating a particular standard of care ( eg a regulation requiring employers to supply safety goggles to a welder), the provision may be used as strong evidence of the standard of care in the negligence action. In effect, a breach of the statutory provision may be taken to be prima facie evidence of breach of duty in the negligence action. For instance, in Tang Shau Tsan v Wealthy Construction Co Ltd (unrep., HCPI 1092/1998, [1999] HKLRD (Yrbk) 374), the finding of negligence was reached solely on the basis of the defendant/employer's breach of statutory duty to place a guard on a circular saw.
而家年年都請唔夠，本身hot kitchen 都唔吸引，仲減人工得返咩人報名自己諗
