把脈，濕，熱點量化？冇量化就冇study case-control study同RCT
所以中醫永遠唔會有療效數據對比
(謬誤)打化療死得仲快仲痛苦?
https://lih.kg/bRamReV
#21 回覆 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區
呢條女用中醫醫癌
金正男
501 回覆
35 Like
171 Dislike
其實冇量化同標準化嘅話你就冇得公正比較療效
把脈，濕，熱點量化？冇量化就冇study case-control study同RCT
所以中醫永遠唔會有療效數據對比
(謬誤)打化療死得仲快仲痛苦?
https://lih.kg/bRamReV
#21 回覆 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區
把脈，濕，熱點量化？冇量化就冇study case-control study同RCT
所以中醫永遠唔會有療效數據對比
(謬誤)打化療死得仲快仲痛苦?
https://lih.kg/bRamReV
#21 回覆 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區
佢2b期個陣都冇做過電療 點樣頂唔順
條timeline就係佢2b期
醫生同佢講做電療化療90%康復率
係因為佢聽到電療化療會有副作用先選擇做自然療法
仲話stage2 90% stage 3 85%都係5%姐
點知一年之後再check已經末期先至有呢條片同咩好神既中醫醫末期can
去到最後最後咪又係西醫緩和治療吊命
死埋
BTW
你可唔可以quote 我係邊到cm有用推廣呢兩隻字thx
條timeline就係佢2b期
醫生同佢講做電療化療90%康復率
係因為佢聽到電療化療會有副作用先選擇做自然療法
仲話stage2 90% stage 3 85%都係5%姐
點知一年之後再check已經末期先至有呢條片同咩好神既中醫醫末期can
去到最後最後咪又係西醫緩和治療吊命
死埋
BTW
你可唔可以quote 我係邊到cm有用推廣呢兩隻字thx
中醫師話有用就有用, 但永遠都攞唔到證據出黎
你自己都講咗啦
我覺得啲人要睇傳統中醫定現代醫學，都係個人決定，但係唔好將中醫納入政府醫療保險體系，要納稅人埋單
你自己都講咗啦
我覺得啲人要睇傳統中醫定現代醫學，都係個人決定，但係唔好將中醫納入政府醫療保險體系，要納稅人埋單
香港醫院派蓮花清瘟添
仲以為有咩source lancet nejm期刊咁
原來只係乜撚野東華三院 醫管局 拎出黎笑死人你去同人討論醫學居然係咁既source不如拎wiki出黎
仲以為有咩source lancet nejm期刊咁
原來只係乜撚野東華三院 醫管局 拎出黎笑死人
你去同人討論醫學居然係咁既source不如拎wiki出黎東華三院真係笑撚左
Dum條中大link都冇咁7啦
Dum條中大link都冇咁7啦
重衰過wiki，至少wiki有時都有source，呢啲
，至少wiki有時都有source，呢啲日日俾人mon住 不如早啲走好過
你有妄想，唔好諱疾忌醫或者迷信巫醫
去到最後其實咩方法都想試
嗰條神棍中醫係咪真係玩鳩佢，癌症都仲阻住人哋吸取營養，除咗高糖分同埋生食物，癌症病人唔應該特別戒口，呢個係常識呀嘛
雖然條女走去信埋啲咁嘅神棍，都似係個腦有事多啲
雖然條女走去信埋啲咁嘅神棍，都似係個腦有事多啲
信中國千年嘅智慧而死
有90%都唔去做真係
中醫副作用係死
其實都唔係唔得嘅.....
好偶然我都見到真係有啲patient 聲稱自己係TCM only。
但係真係好難做，一年都唔知有冇一兩個。
但係根據我自己個人經驗......呢類patients得兩種後果 (imaging 上）
1. progression disease (九成）
2. stable disease （一成）
所以我自己好信中醫醫cancer完完全全係尻嗡。因為我自己有眼睇。
好偶然我都見到真係有啲patient 聲稱自己係TCM only。
但係真係好難做，一年都唔知有冇一兩個。
但係根據我自己個人經驗......呢類patients得兩種後果 (imaging 上）
1. progression disease (九成）
2. stable disease （一成）
所以我自己好信中醫醫cancer完完全全係尻嗡。因為我自己有眼睇。
Survival statistics are available for each stage of cervical cancer in England. These figures are for people diagnosed between 2013 and 2017. These statistics are non-age-standardised which means they don't take into account the age of the people with cervical cancer.
Stage 1
Around 95 out of 100 people (around 95%) will survive their cancer for 5 years or more after diagnosis.
Stage 2
Almost 70 out of 100 people (almost 70%) will survive their cancer for 5 years or more after diagnosis.
Stage 3
More than 40 out of 100 people (more than 40%) will survive their cancer for 5 years or more after diagnosis.
Stage 4
Around 15 out of 100 people (around 15%) will survive their cancer for 5 years or more after being diagnosed.
btw，雖然佢當時後生，但係stage3有85% 醫得好？？？
Stage 1
Around 95 out of 100 people (around 95%) will survive their cancer for 5 years or more after diagnosis.
Stage 2
Almost 70 out of 100 people (almost 70%) will survive their cancer for 5 years or more after diagnosis.
Stage 3
More than 40 out of 100 people (more than 40%) will survive their cancer for 5 years or more after diagnosis.
Stage 4
Around 15 out of 100 people (around 15%) will survive their cancer for 5 years or more after being diagnosed.
btw，雖然佢當時後生，但係stage3有85% 醫得好？？？
如果 Stage 3 都有85% 5年以上存活率，癌症就唔會咁可怕啦。是關好多 cancer 早期都冇病徵。
呢個post乜撚野事
咁撚多人撐中醫醫癌d on9野
民智返左去百尻幾年前咁
咁撚多人撐中醫醫癌d on9野
民智返左去百尻幾年前咁
我都係果句
因人而異？如果真係咁冇重複性、咁啲醫書仲有咩價值？
因人而異？如果真係咁冇重複性、咁啲醫書仲有咩價值？
佢哋自己信就好，鼓勵人大病唔睇西醫睇中醫就真係害人不淺。
要我信中醫治癌，首先有冇癌症病人只睇中醫嘅5年存活率數據？
對唔住，我唔應該咁問，因為中醫都唔知點分第幾期！
要我信中醫治癌，首先有冇癌症病人只睇中醫嘅5年存活率數據？
對唔住，我唔應該咁問，因為中醫都唔知點分第幾期！
你做乜撚嘢
中醫好多偏方真係醫到d奇難雜症
不過好自私唔會外傳
不過好自私唔會外傳
會唔會係用幾千年華人人口去計，的確有重複性
但有重複性唔代表有準確性
較反映到準確性嘅例如有人所共知嘅雙盲測試
但有重複性唔代表有準確性
較反映到準確性嘅例如有人所共知嘅雙盲測試
粗略咁講，冇方法去觀察到係唔係錯嘅理論係唔可靠嘅
佢哋就係成日話啲病人個個都獨一無二，無法設計實驗
中醫可能根本冇“癌”呢個concept