坦狗仔敢覆未

海龍70m 岩拉拔租借費10m
屌你老母咁撚樣直頭商業詐騙啦
仲要間agent 有前科做撚埋d 拿渣野
過橋抽板自己暗中將球會比d 佣金落撚唒袋唔撚同球員講
明明代表球員簽約變左代表間球會
針撚住個球員壓低佢個價係佢身上吸血
回佣之說係空穴來風合理假設囉仆街

又話乜鳩坦狗好有錢 屌你老母啦錢無人嚴多
His argument essentially was that his own agent was actively acting against him, meaning he received a lower salary than he would have and no signing-on fee, whereas SEG maintained it was a good deal.
SEG arranged with Inter a €9.5m commission for its services and a sell-on fee of 7.5 per cent should De Vrij later be sold.
In April 2022, an Amsterdam court ruled that De Vrij had not been made aware of the full scale of the €9.5m commission earned by SEG in negotiating his contract with Inter, and awarded the footballer half of that sum (€4.75m) in damages.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5254663/2024/04/09/de-vrij-seg-compensation-transfer/