許金山殺妻女案重審罪成 再提上訴

如果今次駁回，仲可唔可以再提上訴？

40. It is normally unnecessary to give the jury any special direction on how they are to approach circumstantial evidence.

43. The real issue is whether applying the Judge’s process of deduction based on the relevance of the missing stopper... unwittingly confused the jury.

45. First, she directed the jury... The premise was that if it were established that the stopper could not be found, Lily could not be that person and the scenario of her using the carbon monoxide to kill insects could be eliminated. In so doing, the Judge in effect allowed the jury to ignore the possibility of the stopper being displaced or mistakenly taken away before the search of the car was conducted on 25 November 2015.

48. Secondly, the prosecution did not adduce any evidence in respect of securing the safe custody of all the items found in the car boot after the arrival of the police at the scene.

海關勁啲，告都唔告

計金山 張祺忠 振夫鋼

聽聞仲有其他疑點
睇新聞話佢全家都知道佢同隻狐狸精出雙入對
當老婆話要離婚 因為要分身家 佢就唔肯離婚
同埋當警察通知佢死訊, 佢就話唔明點解老婆要自殺
.... 咁咪啫係不打自招?

算唔算香港陪審團史上首次，第三次上訴

傻鳩死氣唔斷

點會
同埋而家先第二次

佢老婆對佢咁衰，全香港人都同情佢喎

當老婆話要離婚 因為要分身家 佢就唔肯離婚

即係唔離婚但繼續公開地包二奶繼續坐啦你

你分清楚張祺忠同許金山未？

你講既係張褀忠 許金山係出軌然後殺左老婆同阿女果個

極度傻撚 為左少少錢收皮
分完咪再搵過
做anes 好快搵返啫

高學歷罪犯同低學歷罪犯其中一個分別，就係善用政策系統，緊持上訴與否從來都唔係是否有罪與否。 有好多人都係死都唔認錯。

有晒動機，而且用一氧化碳殺老鼠真係太離譜…
但真係想知佢點放個波入去，點利用個波殺人
偵探小說一樣，有冇金田一可以幫手推理一下

就算真係都無用
許生又唔可能篤佢出黎既

就咁google都有兩單真係審咗3次

大學同學話佢人唔錯喎

ching已黑化

當佢用一氧化碳滅鼠係真都好，但將一氧化碳注入瑜珈球絕對講唔通，一定無可能係滅鼠用途，必然係有人想透過擺放瑜珈球殺人於無形，達成完美罪案

好人可以做壞事

因為本身老謀入罪門檻高所以殺人犯只要令到個官覺得未能滿足所有入罪門檻就能打甩老謀（但十居其九會改入交替控罪）
以前都試過有殺人犯打甩老謀，改入其他刑罰較低嘅交替控罪（例：誤殺、傷人17）

勁鳩

又黎