2024年諾貝爾獎頒布到尾聲，今（14）日公布3位學者共同獲得經濟學獎，分別是達龍·阿傑姆奧盧、西蒙·約翰遜及詹姆士·魯賓遜，獲獎原因為研究社會制度如何形成及影響國家繁榮，解釋了為什麼有些國家富裕而有些國家貧窮，並證明了社會制度對國家繁榮的重要性。
2024年諾貝爾獎繼先前頒發生醫、物理、化學、文學、和平等獎項，今（14）日公布最後一個獎項諾貝爾經濟學獎，由任教於美國的3名學者共同獲獎，分別是來自麻省理工學院的達龍·阿傑姆奧盧（Daron Acemoglu）、西蒙·約翰遜（Simon Johnson），以及芝加哥大學的詹姆士·魯賓遜（James A. Robinson）共同獲獎。
諾貝爾官方公布3人的獲獎原因為「關於研究制度如何形成及影響繁榮」，指出3名獲獎學者的貢獻在於幫助我們理解國家之間繁榮程度差異的原因，同時也證明了社會制度對國家繁榮的重要性。法治較差且剝削民眾的社會，通常無法帶來成長或變得更好，獲獎者的研究即幫助人們理解其中原因。
根據獲獎者的研究內容指出，造成國家繁榮差異的一種解釋是殖民時期引入的社會制度，當貧窮國家在被殖民時，往往會引入包容性制度，長期下來促進了該地區人口普遍繁榮。反之，原本曾經富裕的前殖民地變得貧窮，也是出自同一個原因。
2024諾貝爾學獎得主 : 法治較差且剝削民眾的社會，通常無法帶來成長或變得更好
新吉田之寶
68 回覆
148 Like
4 Dislike
割多啲韭菜咪得
往往會引入包容性制度
左膠又贏
左膠又贏
個研究有幾多頁？
真心一問
真心一問
養蝗
劉曉波
成本書
引入包容性其實無錯
問題係lgbtqia = esg = dei = 專制獨裁
問題係lgbtqia = esg = dei = 專制獨裁
有冇個研究論文？
睇落去好似偏向社會學（？）應該容易啲理解
冇咁多數學
睇落去好似偏向社會學（？）應該容易啲理解
冇咁多數學唔係呢種所謂包容
係講緊社會向上流動既包容
係講緊社會向上流動既包容
page 1
See China
See China
香港法治咁好又由治及興
香港人係咪唔需要睇佢啲文
香港人係咪唔需要睇佢啲文
加沙
阿媽是女人
曲線讚中國法治好同好照顧人民
造成國家繁榮差異的一種解釋是殖民時期引入的社會制度，當貧窮國家在被殖民時，往往會引入包容性制度，長期下來促進了該地區人口普遍繁榮
香港
呢d好似係常識，唔駛諾貝爾獎都曉
有冇例子
講得好好
傻共唔撚會明
傻共唔撚會明
Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy Reprint 版本
作者 Daron Acemoglu (Author), James A. Robinson (Author)
作者 Daron Acemoglu (Author), James A. Robinson (Author)
Acemoglu and Robinson published their first co-authored book on the subject, “Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy,” in 2006.
Acemoglu and Robinson are co-authors of the prominent book “Why Nations Fail,” from 2012, which also synthesized much of the trio’s research about political institutions and growth.
Acemoglu and Robinson’s subsequent book “The Narrow Corridor,” published in 2019, examined the historical development of rights and liberties in nation-states. They make the case that political liberty does not have a universal template, but stems from social struggle. As Acemoglu said in 2019, it comes from the “messy process of society mobilizing, people defending their own liberties, and actively setting constraints on how rules and behaviors are imposed on them.”
Acemoglu and Johnson are co-authors of the 2023 book “Power and Progress: Our 1,000-Year Struggle over Technology and Prosperity,” in which they examine artificial intelligence in light of other historical battles for the economic benefits of technological innovation.
Johnson is also co-author of “13 Bankers” (2010), with James Kwak, an examination of U.S. regulation of the finance sector, and “Jump-Starting America” (2021), co-authored with MIT economist Jonathan Gruber, a call for more investment in scientific research and innovation in the U.S.
Acemoglu and Robinson are co-authors of the prominent book “Why Nations Fail,” from 2012, which also synthesized much of the trio’s research about political institutions and growth.
Acemoglu and Robinson’s subsequent book “The Narrow Corridor,” published in 2019, examined the historical development of rights and liberties in nation-states. They make the case that political liberty does not have a universal template, but stems from social struggle. As Acemoglu said in 2019, it comes from the “messy process of society mobilizing, people defending their own liberties, and actively setting constraints on how rules and behaviors are imposed on them.”
Acemoglu and Johnson are co-authors of the 2023 book “Power and Progress: Our 1,000-Year Struggle over Technology and Prosperity,” in which they examine artificial intelligence in light of other historical battles for the economic benefits of technological innovation.
Johnson is also co-author of “13 Bankers” (2010), with James Kwak, an examination of U.S. regulation of the finance sector, and “Jump-Starting America” (2021), co-authored with MIT economist Jonathan Gruber, a call for more investment in scientific research and innovation in the U.S.
你窮啫，我Daddy袋咗好多錢入袋喎
本書開頭拎咗個喺美墨邊境嘅城鎮做比較，一邊俾美國管，另一邊留咗喺墨西哥。
喺地理條件一樣嘅情況吓（氣候，泥土，人口組成etc）啲學者比較兩邊經濟發展嘅差異，發現美國管個邊嘅gdp高墨西哥管個邊好多倍。鑑於假設所有外在環境條件一樣，啲學者就用唯一嘅分別，aka制度嚟解釋點解會有咁大嘅分別
喺地理條件一樣嘅情況吓（氣候，泥土，人口組成etc）啲學者比較兩邊經濟發展嘅差異，發現美國管個邊嘅gdp高墨西哥管個邊好多倍。鑑於假設所有外在環境條件一樣，啲學者就用唯一嘅分別，aka制度嚟解釋點解會有咁大嘅分別