[人權鬥士怒了] F1 2024 阿塞拜彊站 賽後討論區

Benz早幾年DAS睇得清唔清楚

之後Vettel問番佢先好笑

我估大牛 拉利 平 個d 都已經整好左出來 之後就篤老麥 正如Ching FIA 話無問題就即裝即用

YES. YES.

要集中精神揸盡架野 仲邊有時間屌

咩世界

新手睇F1
想問辛斯咁樣硬cut 炒埋佩雷斯架車度都冇後果？？
咁以後一俾人過就扭埋去攬炒得啦？

係香港揸第一盞紅燈熄咗已經標咗出去啦

首先大家都係直行
辛仲要係頭車
其次係頭轆攝尾轆失控
個畫面睇落先似係硬cut

因為講到尾以單只係Racing Incident

新手舊手其實主席左邊咁多位
無理由cut埋去攬炒

事實都係辛斯右邊係收窄緊

其實叻嘅應該用頭碌撞人哋尾碌
人哋就會炒
自己可以揚長而去

8戒成名絕技

明明FIA講到明尾翼除咗drs唔可以變形
唔明點解唔叫cheat

因為辛斯冇扭埋去

innocent until proven guilty

呢d野要好認真細心睇條文先得
車隊日日就係係呢d條文度搵灰色地帶
要搵番FIA係呢度係點樣寫 用詞上有冇漏洞 先決定到係咪真係cheat
有時你淨係講漏一個reference point佢都可以捉到黎甩身

Any car doesn’t mean all cars

“What we don’t want to see is that, at the joint of, let’s say, a rear beam wing to an endplate that it’s decoupled in any way such that it can rotate about a pivot or it can move laterally or up and down,” said then-FIA single-seater director Tim Goss.

“So we’re saying that you can’t have very localised motion of one component relative to another. The assembly can move as a whole body but we don’t expect to see parts of it being able to translate relative to others.”

Quote from Plant F1 六月報導
https://www.planetf1.com/news/f1-flexible-wings-rules-technical-regulations-explained

我理解係尾翼唔可以有「零件/部件」嘅連接以變型
而家麥個尾翼係一塊過定係有decoupled parts 變呢

我就咁睇無？

邊有咁斯文

「屌你老母臭閪 行咁撚慢做乜柒」

我理解係 佢成塊drs郁得既wing flap要係rigid body
要郁就要成塊郁 唔可以有少少位變型
如果咁解讀 咁麥記今場隻wing就係有問題 因為唔係rigid body, 有local deformation

but we don’t expect to see parts of it being able to translate relative to others

呢句唔係任何一part有變咩 唔係好覺要成塊先計

我都覺我講得唔好 唔應該未審先判
不過21年rbr都有flex wing 係beam wing上面 一條直線
而家麥記就係下面 兩個角落
rbr玩咗幾場都俾人發現都有td
咁麥記而家係fia係唔係應該都要開file查下先

「快啲啦又開追悼會㗎啦」
「屌你cut 過嚟要發個訊號先得㗎」
「屌小兒麻痹㗎你」
「1212 隻手呀，幾時輪到隻腳呀」

有後果架自己又無分 又要罰錢整車