Lululemon搞到我家姐無左份工

因為啲衫成本要得幾多錢啫
但整親個賊或者員工自己就賠撚死
仲未計可能會有同黨報復
間公司都深明當代文化好識做

佢等人偷完嘢 走咗先報警喎
理論上佢冇違反政策

錢財身外物

當時弗格森與羅傑斯試圖阻止3人搶劫，但被他們無視，...

咪係, 你話條褲係靚女著咗1日就算啦

一萬幾千蚊貨喺啲大公司眼中就係"唔好搞咁多野啦"

弗格森表示，根據公司員工政策，她們不應該試圖阻止搶匪搶劫、也不應該報警或公開討論事件，事後只需要掃瞄一個QR Code，不用寫任何警示標語，以避免嚇到顧客。

又唔阻止 又唔報警
全部任攞

財散人安樂

調返轉被炒者係黑人就可上頭版

左癌 = 世界文明毒瘤

睇到1999

自己鳩估係因為報警

Company policy shared with Insider indicates the women were likely fired for recording and interacting with the robbers, rather than for calling the police.

Lululemon said in a later, expanded statement that the two employees weren't fired for calling the police.

"They were terminated for knowingly violating our zero-tolerance policy related to physically engaging with the perpetrators which put their lives and the safety of our guests and other employees at risk,"

https://www.businessinsider.com/lululemon-employees-say-they-were-fired-reporting-robbery-to-police-2023-5

咪當我Lulu

睇吓密幾多先講啦
柒少陣啦

講緊「打劫唔好反抗」嘅政策喎
唔通喺冇槍權嘅地方（例如：香港）就會鼓勵員工同劫匪打過呀？

呢個post好多後生仔，仲好認真。

其實美國啲公司係計緊個風險同成本…
當你一件貨成本係一蚊美金，佢賣一件就等於廿件，就算俾啲黑鬼任攞都好，佢哋最後都圍到本
但員工因工傷左，可能告9公司，公司會賠天價，個成本太高…
雖然咁計係好衰，明顯公司係保障自己唔係員工

咁經典的潮文改篇竟然咁多人唔識, 連登真係細路仔天下

樓主講起有冇扯火

陳健洲？

美國最強大既存在
莫過於係一個耶撚黑人同性戀女人，同時係支持環保同食素。

好撚多新會燃