當年點解有人話用得多微波爐會致癌？

微波=輻射=核輻射=核爆=癌症

好奇問咗ChatGPT
Visible light is generally considered to be safe and does not directly cause skin cancer. Unlike UV radiation, visible light has lower energy and does not have enough energy to break chemical bonds or directly damage DNA in cells.

However, visible light can contribute to the development of skin cancer indirectly. Specifically, visible light can activate certain compounds in the skin, such as porphyrins, which can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) through a process known as photodynamic action. ROS can damage cellular structures, including DNA, and over time, this damage can accumulate and lead to mutations in the DNA that can contribute to the development of skin cancer.

當然
It's important to note that the contribution of visible light to the development of skin cancer is generally considered to be much lower than that of UV radiation.

我唔直接答你，我都用 ChatGPT答你

我懶得打先用gpt啫
你唔識就唔好駁啦，magnetic field個direction係perpendicular to radiation flux，magnetic flux會永遠等於零
再唔信嘅你去睇下maxwell’s equation，poynting vector

就算係用，啲人都係用E-field多過用B-field

咁我唔用ChatGPT 答你(poynting vector 方向)magnetic flux會永遠等於零，唔係「magnetic flux會永遠等於零」

屋企人喺政府合署頂樓返工 同期計埋佢自己有四個人中cancer

同而家話食carbs等於食毒藥一樣

你有讀過書的話 講野可唔可以科學啲 或者唔識可以唔出聲

放射治療師咪GG

唔講咁多即刻駁嘴
係用都用B-field intensity，而唔係用flux嚟形容

連登慣用語係磁通量

點解丁完之後隻碟熱嘢食唔熱（嘢食係雪櫃下格拎出嚟），係唔係個嘢壞咗？

叮多陣啦

哦

無問題但班技師個個都係出房先㩒掣,
同d做lasik既醫生話風險極低但自己都戴眼鏡一樣

邊同，放射治療師一日要唔知㩒幾多次，你病人一年做一次咋喎

蠟 鈉
C9嘅創作力量同幻想

我老豆話當年我呀爺九十幾歲人一直都好地地
自從屋企買左部微波爐 唔夠兩年佢就走左

啲普通人聽到漏輻射就好驚
就聯想起會致癌
好多人唔會自己google去搵答案

當年話MSG食死人條撚屌 周x祥博士 咪仲係道鳩吹緊成百萬views
食鹽多嘅話都死啦
翻譯博士當自己醫生定化學博士
唔撚使負責任

樓主應該係文科仔
聽到輻射就好驚好驚
同當年啲人一樣

到底發生了什麼事
明明應該食物嘅水份子數先被加熱，跟住啲熱能先至有食物傳導去隻碟度

你咪試吓每隔兩分鐘照一次
朝九晚五咁照
睇吓會唔會有事囉