舊年三月，當英國政壇開始呼籲唔好再派法官來香港，當時法官廖柏嘉堅決留任多三年
其實應該話，港共今次居然冇拎佢講嘅野出來宣傳係好神奇，按理佢地應該會覺得好啱聽
可以由下面條 link 去 7:32 開始聽 (利申：英文好差，聽咗 n 次先抄到下面嘅逐字記錄，再用9流廣東話翻譯，唔知我有冇誤解錯佢講嘅野
)Host：Why is that [democracy] less important than the rule of law?
主持：點解 [民主] 冇法治重要呢?
Because I think, look, without the rule of law, you, society cannot function.
因為我覺得，嗱，冇法治嘅話，社會係唔能夠運作得到
I think that in our present system in this country [UK], I quite accept that without democracy, it’d be unacceptable.
我諗，我地現有制度入面，喺依個國家 [英國]，我都幾同意，如果冇民主嘅話，係唔可以接受架
But to me, the rule of law, you, a country, like China, works, and now works because they have the rule of law, but they don’t have democracy.
但對我來講，法治，一個國家好似中國咁，係行得通喎，而且依家運作到，係因為佢地有法治，但佢地冇民主
And I think that’s evident that you can have a society, not a society I want to live in, you can have a society works very well, provided it’s accepted by the great majority of people, which doesn’t have democracy.
而我覺得，明顯係，你可以有一個社會，[雖然] 我唔會想住喺個嗰社會到，你都係可以有一個社會運作得好好，前題係絕大部分人接受到佢冇民主
對比翻佢對英國政府嘅態度就差好遠，佢就脫歐相關立法作警告，話英國有風險成為「獨裁」國家，因為相關立法有可能違反國際法同限制咗司法覆核行政當局嘅範圍，但就唔知佢點睇中國有冇違反中英聯合聲明呢?
= = = = = 相關 links = = = = =
網路研討會：
https://www.matrixlaw.co.uk/resource/the-matrix-law-pod-episode-26-lord-neuberger-and-the-rule-of-law/
Lord Neuberger: UK judge defies critics to extend Hong Kong post for three years
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/lord-neuberger-uk-judge-defies-critics-to-extend-hong-kong-post-for-three-years-mc06rrjxk
Brexit strategy risks UK 'dictatorship', says ex-president of supreme court
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/oct/07/brexit-strategy-puts-uk-on-slippery-slope-to-tyranny-lawyers-told
