統計一下大家既MBTI類型

我諗佢指嘅特別係差唔多全部都高分冇乜傾向 btw我見到呢啲結果都會直覺覺得係測錯

有冇同type嘅朋友

d結果咁撚飄忽
我宣佈MBTI同星座都係一尻樣

啲人話星座係統計學
同埋樓上都冇咩人做16 personalities

The Meyers-Briggs does not test for 16 personality types; it tests for nothing psychological at all. There is no empirical basis for the question development and the MBTI is not empirically linked to anything psychological. It is said to be based off of Jung, but it is not true. It was made as a game which caught on and became a multi-million dollar business due to its fun and unique four letter results which offers you a few complimentary phrases in return for $100. The Myers-Briggs is noting more than a warm-up game for other more serious training. The MBTI has severe flaws including an utter lack of validity, and incredibly low levels of reliability. Reading tea leaves will give you a better idea of your personality.

話星座係統計學
同話而家呢種方法test mbti係心理學
無撚分別

same

窮撚揮手區

自己test唔準好正常
但作為分析人格嘅模型mbti有佢嘅可取之處

有冇得講多啲

我覺得最明顯係分到S同N
其他字母都勁飄

利申：感覺

請你找google神

唔準既話有咩意思
好似上面做兩次個結果都唔同

如果有個真係準既 我會信

有冇圍爐

我差唔多半年至一年做一次
次次做都唔同結果，點算？
試過ENTP/ENFP/INTP/INFP
不過多數係ENTP/ENFP，加埋大概7成

Same

INFP 數值80幾
上網睇到「INFP 的人格特質這類型的人只佔了全球人口約 2 - 5% 」 呢到佔咗全球幾多

ISFJ
最憎呢個人格 因為好似係為咗他人而活咁

唔準係源自於 自我了解不足/混淆期望同現嘅自己/解讀題目等等 某程度嚟講係死症 你理論冇問題都阻止唔到啲人搞錯 所以我覺得與其當係心理測試嚟睇 不如攞嚟認識人嘅心理活動好過

INTP

你可以叫自己做NP人
少兩個英文字無所謂啦

見上面介紹完用s字頭個網做
跟住個個人都唔識睇結果

利申：做完+唔識睇

你全部都好平均 差唔多30 其實算偏高 咁樣嘅結果其實係有啲矛盾 因為某啲cognitive function係處於對立關係（Si/Ne Fi/Te) 唔應該全部都高