IT討論區(117) 不開post的人

pure fp黎講真係no loop，就算可以loop，無recursive data flow都好難叫fp。如果你話齋call call higher order functions例如reduce map filter之類嘅就唔係好算fp

Call map reduce filter都唔係好算
有冇咁harsh呀

咁如果我成個系統都係 Function 冇 Object 嘅概念咁算唔算 FP

我一個main function寫晒所有野

有冇 Loop？

唔用loop
其實同一段code copy and paste幾次都做到loop既效果

成日覺得programmer唔好局限用loop

Loops are discouraged as a consequence, because loops are only useful in combination with mutable state. The function as a whole is pure, which is great, but the paradigm of functional programming does not only apply at the level of whole functions.

屌

睇嚟我距離 FP 好遠

講起fp 最近講緊下個project 想試下玩elixir
香港係咪完全冇人用

係既 不過
Closures are poor man's objects and vice versa.

其實講得呢句代表對fp了解唔夠深

利申 真係唔識fp 連hello world都無寫過

你咁叫procedural

有啲分唔清你地係玩膠定點

食屎狗定 IT 狗

Same 一齊玩

https://jobsdb.com/hk/en/job/jobad-100003008381042

又有免費午飯

認真架啦
fp concept根本唔係咁易明
我就完全唔識嘅

而家咩工都話要識AI IOT

係唔深但呢個係最直接嘅觀感，其他咩side effects，pure唔pure，mutable唔mutable之類，functions chaining，monad之類真係無recursion黎得咁直接嘅觀感，可能因為讀完一個course之後就無用（你分分鐘都有讀過果個Haskell course）雖然話FP係一種programming paradigm，但如果隻prog lang個type system唔夠supportive感覺都係差緊d

唔敢係呢個post拋書包，驚俾手巴吊打