IT討論區(80) 做連卡佛真係好幸福,有得減薪50%,IT狗就已被炒,減薪100%
ミクミク９９
1001 回覆
8 Like
0 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
吹水技巧如何?
我16年尾由貨倉佬轉去做p又冇Github連cert都冇都有16K
我16年尾由貨倉佬轉去做p又冇Github連cert都冇都有16K
Emmm... 我都唔識講，佢問一句，我答一句咁囉
個projects 上過兩次trending, c 比stars 既都係大陸人居多
面試:
面試技巧>>>>>實力技巧
返工:
吹水技巧>>>>>實力技巧
面試技巧>>>>>實力技巧
返工:
吹水技巧>>>>>實力技巧
分享吓
面試條友問做乜唔放野上Github:
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/GrotesqueUnawareHeifer-mobile.mp4
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/GrotesqueUnawareHeifer-mobile.mp4
要搵個地方先
There are two ways to use SIMD.
1) You code explicitly for SIMD. For example:
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~kar/pubsk/simd.pdf
This tends to get the best possible performance at the expense of portability. For example, you may have different versions of the same function for x86, POWER and ARM. You may event have different versions for different levels of the same ISA, like MMX, SSE and AVX on the x86. There are libraries to abstract away common SIMD primitives on different processors like load/store and basic arithmetics to avoid multiple versions but you give up some platforms specific primitives that may give up substantial performance advantage.
2) You code in generic C/C++ and let a compiler to extract parallelism in your code and convert some operations into SIMD. Most compilers today know how to do that. If you write your database engine in C/C++ and compile that with gcc or clang then you are very likely to find some SIMD usage in the compiled executable.
1) You code explicitly for SIMD. For example:
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~kar/pubsk/simd.pdf
This tends to get the best possible performance at the expense of portability. For example, you may have different versions of the same function for x86, POWER and ARM. You may event have different versions for different levels of the same ISA, like MMX, SSE and AVX on the x86. There are libraries to abstract away common SIMD primitives on different processors like load/store and basic arithmetics to avoid multiple versions but you give up some platforms specific primitives that may give up substantial performance advantage.
2) You code in generic C/C++ and let a compiler to extract parallelism in your code and convert some operations into SIMD. Most compilers today know how to do that. If you write your database engine in C/C++ and compile that with gcc or clang then you are very likely to find some SIMD usage in the compiled executable.
有個comment 話係惡意軟體
個UI
如果我做呢D UI, 比公司兜走好耐
如果我做呢D UI, 比公司兜走好耐
果時用webview求其包住
更新日期
2017年10月19日
接近3年冇人理
2017年10月19日
接近3年冇人理
網頁都做到咁
公司班designer果時要求咁設計架
太多花巧野話老師們唔喜颧
design你識條鐵咩
太多花巧野話老師們唔喜颧
design你識條鐵咩
我github最多都係3星
Java同JavaScript 既關係
1000