<好撚重要>10·4元朗14歲左腳大脾中槍事件
月闕星
923 回覆
1362 Like
5 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁
次序好緊要
推！！
成件事係市民制止持槍暴徒
推
推
推
Push!!!!!
Push
推
推
推
遊乃強個撚樣有去醫院
成班仆街都唔知係咪恐嚇人認罪
成班仆街都唔知係咪恐嚇人認罪
一定要推，你見差佬守著屯門醫院，唔俾病人接觸外界，就明顯知道佢怕記者索到料出新聞
一定係身有屎，唔係個發言人唔會叫大家focus係示威者暴力而唔係個差佬一黎休班，二黎撞人，三黎開槍
一定要推
一定係身有屎，唔係個發言人唔會叫大家focus係示威者暴力而唔係個差佬一黎休班，二黎撞人，三黎開槍
一定要推
推
推
呢D外國人本身就係良知喪盡,食花生扮客觀理性.
你不如問下佢過去三個幾月,POPO,甲由,鄉黑有變樣嘢係正常,邊樣嘢係可以比佢質疑嘅啦.
今日香港,明日世界啦,柒頭. 到時揾火星人食花生扮客觀理性咁去問返佢,點解你地會咁架?
你不如問下佢過去三個幾月,POPO,甲由,鄉黑有變樣嘢係正常,邊樣嘢係可以比佢質疑嘅啦.
今日香港,明日世界啦,柒頭. 到時揾火星人食花生扮客觀理性咁去問返佢,點解你地會咁架?
推
Detailed process of the shooting in Yuen Long on 4 October 2019
1. The police constable concerned stopped the private car (it is suspected he bumped into a person(s) while driving; some believed that he was at that time obstructed by roadblocks. Video clips of the scene / further clarification is needed)
2. The police constable, still in the private car, was then surrounded by a group of citizens at the scene. A dispute between the two parties ensued.
3. The police constable got off the private car and was pressing his waist with his hand, but he did not reveal his identity.
4. The citizens then rushed to the police constable.
5. A gunshot was heard.
6. Some citizens dispersed, while some kept surrounding the police constable.
7. All citizens dispersed. The first petrol bomb was hurled, setting the location of the police constable on fire .
8. The police constable escaped from the fire and his revolver dropped on the ground, with the magazine falling off from it.
9. Some citizens attempted to kick away / pick up the revolver, but it was quickly snatched back by the police constable.
10. The police constable made a phone call for help, saying “Help me, I am beaten up.”
11. The second petrol bomb was hurled to the police constable.
12. The police private car was damaged.
Points to note:
- It was the police constable who opened fire first, after which the petrol bomb was hurled towards him.
- The police constable never revealed his identity all along, and he fired the shot without warning. In addition, he ignored the citizens’ request for him to produce his warrant card.
- The incident is much questionable should there be any evidence proving that the police constable did bump into a person(s) while driving.
- Revolvers should only be used for self-defence but not for protecting oneself from getting caught if the person has committed a crime.
1. The police constable concerned stopped the private car (it is suspected he bumped into a person(s) while driving; some believed that he was at that time obstructed by roadblocks. Video clips of the scene / further clarification is needed)
2. The police constable, still in the private car, was then surrounded by a group of citizens at the scene. A dispute between the two parties ensued.
3. The police constable got off the private car and was pressing his waist with his hand, but he did not reveal his identity.
4. The citizens then rushed to the police constable.
5. A gunshot was heard.
6. Some citizens dispersed, while some kept surrounding the police constable.
7. All citizens dispersed. The first petrol bomb was hurled, setting the location of the police constable on fire .
8. The police constable escaped from the fire and his revolver dropped on the ground, with the magazine falling off from it.
9. Some citizens attempted to kick away / pick up the revolver, but it was quickly snatched back by the police constable.
10. The police constable made a phone call for help, saying “Help me, I am beaten up.”
11. The second petrol bomb was hurled to the police constable.
12. The police private car was damaged.
Points to note:
- It was the police constable who opened fire first, after which the petrol bomb was hurled towards him.
- The police constable never revealed his identity all along, and he fired the shot without warning. In addition, he ignored the citizens’ request for him to produce his warrant card.
- The incident is much questionable should there be any evidence proving that the police constable did bump into a person(s) while driving.
- Revolvers should only be used for self-defence but not for protecting oneself from getting caught if the person has committed a crime.
幫推，有英文版！
有用post
推上熱門
推上熱門
有用post
推上熱門
推上熱門