用同理心connect德國人
明撚冇
【臨崖勒馬】請立刻停止使用『赤納粹』比喻
暴走的赫胥黎
260 回覆
78 Like
420 Dislike
Push
反納粹有咩問題 
你覺得中共做既野無NAZI咁仆街?你係咪太睇少中共
唔知講咩好，但有時有d 野明明係存在但為左感受而唔係面對硬係覺得有問題
on9... 大陸仔..
人哋堂堂大國自二戰起一直反省... 正面面對自己過錯..
你以為好似支那咁撚要面咩...傻閪
人哋堂堂大國自二戰起一直反省... 正面面對自己過錯..
你以為好似支那咁撚要面咩...傻閪
轉咗講antichinazi好耐
唔講的話德國就會黎幫拖？？？
不推文回覆呀各位
另外真係要鬧多次
樓主騎劫攬抄巴國際視野呢點，係好可恥
另外真係要鬧多次
樓主騎劫攬抄巴國際視野呢點，係好可恥
咁又點？
你唔係以為納粹響西方眼中就係殺得人多咁簡單啊嘛
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/4fg79s/is_the_holocaust_different_and_unparalleled_from/d2a3hn7?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x
// Without further context the comparison in scale gains us little knowledge in itself. As a professor of mine used to say "What do we know now that we know that?" The comparison in scale only makes sense when we contextualize by for example inferring intentions regarding genocidal intentions from it.//
你唔係以為納粹響西方眼中就係殺得人多咁簡單啊嘛
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/4fg79s/is_the_holocaust_different_and_unparalleled_from/d2a3hn7?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x
// Without further context the comparison in scale gains us little knowledge in itself. As a professor of mine used to say "What do we know now that we know that?" The comparison in scale only makes sense when we contextualize by for example inferring intentions regarding genocidal intentions from it.//
la
拉
你以為啦
cross out左、講到明係反納粹嘅swastika都試過畀人ban
何況無cross out嘅
https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-confusing-rules-on-swastikas-and-nazi-symbols/a-45063547
// In cases of controversy, it is usually up to courts to rule on whether the use of a Nazi symbol has educational, scientific, journalistic or artistic merit. One of the most prominent court decisions regarding the use of the swastika is a 2007 decision from the Federal Court of Justice. The judges ruled that the use of crossed-out swastikas was legal, overturning a previous decision from a local court that had ordered an activist to pay 3,600 euros because he had sold anti-Nazi merchandise featuring the swastika online. There are a lot of gray areas when it comes to the ban on anti-constitutional symbols in Germany: Rulings by various judges and courts can often even seem contradictory. //
cross out左、講到明係反納粹嘅swastika都試過畀人ban
何況無cross out嘅
https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-confusing-rules-on-swastikas-and-nazi-symbols/a-45063547
// In cases of controversy, it is usually up to courts to rule on whether the use of a Nazi symbol has educational, scientific, journalistic or artistic merit. One of the most prominent court decisions regarding the use of the swastika is a 2007 decision from the Federal Court of Justice. The judges ruled that the use of crossed-out swastikas was legal, overturning a previous decision from a local court that had ordered an activist to pay 3,600 euros because he had sold anti-Nazi merchandise featuring the swastika online. There are a lot of gray areas when it comes to the ban on anti-constitutional symbols in Germany: Rulings by various judges and courts can often even seem contradictory. //
知唔知乜嘢叫粵拼
駁唔到就話人帶風向
多謝推post
佢真係好怕有人提#Chinazi
因為#Chinazi = bad guy, 咁抗爭者 #Anti-Chinazi 就係 good guy, 黑白分明.
有人吹唔好提#Chinazi係因為外媒好避忌, 唔敢得罪猶太人云云.
咁你又知唔知其實成日提得納粹暴行最多, 在國民教育作為重點教程, 仲要起咗一座超巨形博物館展示當年納粹對猶太人犯下種種暴行的國家, 正正就係由受害人在二戰後歷盡艱辛建立的以色列.
猶太人不會因為係民族傷痛而拒絕回望這段慘痛的歷史, 相反佢哋時刻母忘當初受到納粹的迫害, 以警醒國民只有建立自己的國家, 方可以保護民族同胞的自由和尊嚴.
至於有人話德國人都好怕人提納粹, 咁佢哋實在太睇少德國人了, 德國人可是完全承認當年祖先犯下的暴行, 並為過去的反人類罪反深切道謙及反省, 如果佢地知道又有新的納粹政權崛起並開始對自由世界伸出魔掌, 你認為現今奉信民主自由的德國人會抽手旁觀, 無視新納粹霸權再次崛起, 破壞人類文明嗎?
當年大力要求釋放劉曉波, 及後來收容劉霞, 又係邊個國家呢?
因為#Chinazi = bad guy, 咁抗爭者 #Anti-Chinazi 就係 good guy, 黑白分明.
有人吹唔好提#Chinazi係因為外媒好避忌, 唔敢得罪猶太人云云.
咁你又知唔知其實成日提得納粹暴行最多, 在國民教育作為重點教程, 仲要起咗一座超巨形博物館展示當年納粹對猶太人犯下種種暴行的國家, 正正就係由受害人在二戰後歷盡艱辛建立的以色列.
猶太人不會因為係民族傷痛而拒絕回望這段慘痛的歷史, 相反佢哋時刻母忘當初受到納粹的迫害, 以警醒國民只有建立自己的國家, 方可以保護民族同胞的自由和尊嚴.
至於有人話德國人都好怕人提納粹, 咁佢哋實在太睇少德國人了, 德國人可是完全承認當年祖先犯下的暴行, 並為過去的反人類罪反深切道謙及反省, 如果佢地知道又有新的納粹政權崛起並開始對自由世界伸出魔掌, 你認為現今奉信民主自由的德國人會抽手旁觀, 無視新納粹霸權再次崛起, 破壞人類文明嗎?
當年大力要求釋放劉曉波, 及後來收容劉霞, 又係邊個國家呢?