攪笑版《福爾摩斯與華生》劣評如潮 觀眾中途離場 Netflix拒絕接貨

喜劇不好拍，今年美國聖誕節時碰壁的喜劇電影又＋1：由威爾法洛（Will Ferrell）與約翰·C·萊利（John C. Reilly）主演的智商新低《福爾摩濕與滑生（ Holmes & Watson）》於25日上映搶聖誕節假期的票房，不過可以說狠狠跌一跤，不但爛番茄以新鮮度0開盤，就連觀眾喜愛程度都只有21%，就算趕上大偵探福爾摩斯的熱潮，也不代表劇本隨便寫寫觀眾就會買單啊...

只不過這兩位喜劇搭檔的慣用搞笑手段顯然在這個題材上沒能成功融入，《福爾摩濕與滑生》上映後的評價慘到爆，爛番茄瓶到一面倒負評，到目前為止24篇影評中只有一篇給予好評，好壞比4%......

這些慘不忍睹的評價包括：
「整部電影就像是有人剪了電影裡不好笑的刪減鏡頭，只能放在工作人員表當花絮的那種，然後把這些東西給延伸為一部電影」

「70年代的短命情境喜劇都比《福爾摩濕與滑生》好笑」

「《福爾摩濕與滑生》是一部立意良善但是沒有達到預期目標的作品，還不至於成為一場完全的災難，但這部電影讓人沮喪是因為這些人明明都可以做得更好、玩得更瘋的。」

「如果你選擇看這部電影，你會看到一個半小時不同版本的同樣橋段：如果『（請填入某種現代產物）』在維多莉亞時代就存在那會發生什麼事？」

「威爾法洛與約翰·C·萊利在《爛兄爛弟》10年後，終於在大螢幕上重逢，這部電影應該是一部幽默的狂歡，而不是像這樣絕望又不知所措的一團糟」

「《福爾摩濕與滑生》最引人入勝的謎題在於：這麼多好笑的人怎麼會同時演出一部這麼不好笑的電影，而且這部電影還不夠聰明到認清自己本來應該有多笨 」

▼沒錯，電影裡除了威爾法洛與約翰·C·萊利，還有雷夫范恩斯的「莫里亞蒂教授」 、《怪醫豪斯》 Hugh Laurie以及Rebecca Hall，加上 《博物館驚魂夜》史提夫庫根。這麼多大咖與笑匠湊在一起，竟然拍出一部這麼不好笑的電影，果然是個謎啊

目前爛番茄上唯一正評
《福爾摩濕與滑生》沒有傷害我的大腦，只是需要幾個小時來休息一下讓他們再生（No brain cells are harmed by Holmes & Watson, just given a few hours to rest and regenerate.這......算是好評嗎？

https://youtu.be/OpCw0VMzfAc

https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a25691147/holmes-and-watson-film-walkouts-bad-reviews/


Christy Christian
@Dreamajojo77
Holmes and Watson is horrible ...this is almost the worst movie I have ever seen, it just keeps getting worse, not even stupid funny (why not do the typical Ferrell movie?) we are dying and not even watching it. @CoachCWC


taco rocket
@lindsuhhhh
Holmes and Watson is literally the worst movie we’ve ever seen 😂

RJ Birtsch
@RyanWithAnO
#HolmesAndWatson was the farthest slide from comedy I’ve had the unpleasant opportunity to view. Tragic end to a comedic era.



GA for NU
@Coach_Devaney
@HolmesAndWatson is an absolute disaster. Had to wake up 3 other family members 40 minutes in just to walk out. Possibly overtakes Ishtar as worse movie of all time! Don’t waste your $ or time! #HolmesandWatson


Pat Gibbons
@pggibbons
Instead of blaming the writing maybe people will finally realize that Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly just aren’t that funny. #HolmesAndWatson


One fan tweeted: "Holmes and Watson is horrible ...this is almost the worst movie I have ever seen, it just keeps getting worse, not even stupid funny (why not do the typical Ferrell movie?) we are dying and not even watching it."

Other fans tweeted asking for a refund and advising people not to watch it.


Stephanie Moreno
@fefisita
when a movie is so horrible you and half the theater walk out.. 🙄 hey @RegalMovies, can I get a refund? 😩#HolmesAndWatson #Holmies

Ray
@itsraybans
If you’re thinking of seeing @HolmesAndWatson ..... DO NOT. It was so bad 😭

Pranaya Pahwa
@veto_pahwa
Why is Holmes and Watson even advertising? At some point, isn’t it a waste of money to even try?

According to Deadline, Sony Pictures tried to unload Holmes & Watson, the new Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly comedy where they play Sherlock Holmes and John Watson, respectively, to Netflix. The test scores for the movie were so bad that Sony felt they had a flop on their hands, but Netflix decided they didn’t want it even though Netflix keeps all their viewership data a secret. It’s possible that the price was too high (the film cost $42 million to make), but it’s kind of damning that Netflix, which bought trash like The Cloverfield Paradox, thought that a Will Ferrell-John C. Reilly comedy was too bad to be worth buying.

http://collider.com/netflix-holmes-and-watson-sony/

Netflix 出名專收爛片都唔肯要

Will Ferrell
呢幾年d片都鳩鳩地
多數失晒控咁九唔搭八

其實個導演會唔會俾電影公司隊冧