兩個網站收視光師皮

105 回覆
38 Like 92 Dislike
2018-12-02 23:31:15
2018-12-02 23:31:51
激光有錢收 而且做完老咗都會有近視遠視 而且有後遺症
2018-12-02 23:33:05
聽過香港最新研發果隻DIMS鏡片未? 有咩睇法
2018-12-02 23:33:24
我自己親身驗證過
每日閉眼打J一次都會醫好近視 每次打完J開眼個下都會覺得睇野清晰左
一個月後去驗眼近視真心淺左 個視光師仲話我而家個副眼鏡唔岩要配過副
我心諗 半年後我都唔使戴添啦 仲想呃我錢
而家我都開始唔需要戴眼鏡
建議樓主都試下 試下冇壞
2018-12-02 23:37:44
因為無解決個病因 隻眼啲肌肉依然繃緊 唔差就奇
2018-12-02 23:38:34
2018-12-02 23:41:42
咁信數據又點
你咪唔好信囉 對我有用就得啦
樓主同我都係同一類人 對比其他人
係比較知咩先係真理
2018-12-02 23:42:24
用機驗只可以捕捉到個一刻時度數 所以只會係個參考
另外散曈之後度都會有差別
所以樓主都係睇小d內容農場 唔好做on9仔啦
2018-12-02 23:43:27
我開頭睇覺得好work
但係睇到條友度數係10000/距離
然後話自己少左100度
我心諗 content farm都冇咁on9
2018-12-02 23:45:10
The Bates method has been criticized not only because there is no good evidence it works, but also because it can have negative consequences for those who attempt to follow it: they might damage their eyes through overexposure of their eyes to sunlight, put themselves and others at risk by not wearing their corrective lenses while driving, or neglect conventional eye care, possibly allowing serious conditions to develop.[4][9]

[4] Chou, Brian (15 September 2004). "Exposing the Secrets of Fringe Eye Care". Review of Optometry. 141 (9).

[9] Grierson, Ian (2000). "Exercises for Eyes as an Alternative to Glasses". The Eye Book: Eyes and Eye Problems Explained. Liverpool University Press. pp. 58–60.

Extracted from Wikipedia "Bates method"

樓主唔識就唔好係度害人啦....
唔知一樣野就去睇多啲有曬evidence同proof嘅學術期刊,唔係睇啲無無謂謂嘅網係度9up然後就信曬佢地
2018-12-02 23:46:20
你搵下幸存者偏差

你要證明一樣野有冇用,最基本要independent/dependent/ control variables 3 樣野
你就咁拎個好左既人(先唔講佢係真係好左定係自覺好左),話呢個方法work
對於有少少理性既人來講係冇說服力
2018-12-02 23:46:21
所以話民智開左未,其實好多事都會見到答案。。。大家心中有數,見怪不怪
2018-12-02 23:47:07
諾貝爾
2018-12-02 23:47:49
其實有近視可以試下 條數係啱10000/250 250度最遠睇到40cm清晰 佢睇得遠咗咪近視低咗囉 佢無去驗啫
2018-12-02 23:48:40
唔怪之得倫敦金呀網上裸聊呀個啲真係搵到食
原來真係有人信...
2018-12-02 23:49:40
笑到仆街
呢個年頭仲有呢啲人
2018-12-02 23:50:13
係直視太陽呢樣有爭議 唔代表佢其他方法唔work
2018-12-02 23:53:04
仲要限二百度內,lens 個組肌肉拉得太緊
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞