其實佢條條款未必入到份Contract![]()
因為佢呢個case我估可以係Control of Exemption Clause Ordinance 入面有得拗話佢拎去捐係substantially different performance of contractual duty
所以要經過reasonableness test
另外 佢亦都可能過唔到CECO入面Sale of Goods Ordinance條法例
所以有可能呢條條款係用黎嚇人
因為上到法庭其實法庭偏向保護weak bargaining power果邊
利申:year 1 9up 淨係讀左一半contract law
