最近白皮書10+1新政策鬧得沸沸揚揚。睇返以往移民政嘅修訂，政府都會好快回覆新政策唔包括BNO，但今次連彭定康去信國會，都無人出嚟confirm包唔包括BNO visa，搞到我非常擔心，所以小弟就搵ChatGPT draft封信send咗俾我嗰區嘅MP。如果大家都有少少擔心嘅話，都歡迎大家拎封email去用，或者根據自己嘅情況修改，至少等佢哋都留意到香港人嘅聲音。如果國會願意早啲覆，
大家拎個安心都好
［要人］BNO 10+1 一人一封去信MP
94340635
51 回覆
32 Like
46 Dislike
[Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Postcode] [Email Address] [Date]
[MP's Full Name] [Address]
Dear [MP's Last Name],
Subject: Urgent Request for Clarification and Parliamentary Inquiry Regarding Proposed Immigration Reforms and the BN(O) Visa Route
I hope this message finds you well.
I am writing to you as a British National (Overseas) (BN(O)) visa holder currently residing in the UK and working toward settlement. I have been following the recent Government white paper, Restoring Control over the Immigration System, published on 12 May 2025, and I would like to express my serious concerns about how the proposed changes may affect the BN(O) visa route—particularly in regard to Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) eligibility and eventual naturalisation.
As you are aware, the BN(O) visa route was launched in 2020 not as part of the general immigration system but as a bespoke, non-immigration policy grounded in the UK's historic and moral obligations to Hong Kongers. It represents a pathway to settlement and, ultimately, citizenship, which was extended in good faith to uphold longstanding commitments by the UK Government. Many of us made life-changing decisions to relocate and build a future here based on those commitments.
[MP's Full Name] [Address]
Dear [MP's Last Name],
Subject: Urgent Request for Clarification and Parliamentary Inquiry Regarding Proposed Immigration Reforms and the BN(O) Visa Route
I hope this message finds you well.
I am writing to you as a British National (Overseas) (BN(O)) visa holder currently residing in the UK and working toward settlement. I have been following the recent Government white paper, Restoring Control over the Immigration System, published on 12 May 2025, and I would like to express my serious concerns about how the proposed changes may affect the BN(O) visa route—particularly in regard to Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) eligibility and eventual naturalisation.
As you are aware, the BN(O) visa route was launched in 2020 not as part of the general immigration system but as a bespoke, non-immigration policy grounded in the UK's historic and moral obligations to Hong Kongers. It represents a pathway to settlement and, ultimately, citizenship, which was extended in good faith to uphold longstanding commitments by the UK Government. Many of us made life-changing decisions to relocate and build a future here based on those commitments.
Specifically, I would like to highlight the unique nature of the BN(O) visa route. Unlike typical immigration pathways, the BN(O) visa is a non-immigration policy grounded in historic and moral obligations to the people of Hong Kong. It is designed as a bespoke route to settlement, ultimately leading to naturalisation as British citizens. BN(O) holders are already British nationals under UK law, a fact that further distinguishes this route from standard immigration programs. This is not a new nationality application—rather, it is a continuation of an existing constitutional relationship with the United Kingdom. It does not follow the traditional trajectory of economic or labour-based migration, but rather serves as a humanitarian and constitutional commitment by the UK.
Given this distinct context, I respectfully urge you to ask the Government, through a formal parliamentary question or other appropriate channel, whether the BN(O) visa route will be exempt from any restrictive measures or reclassifications introduced in the recent white paper. Moreover, I kindly request that you advocate for the equal and fair treatment of BN(O) holders in any future considerations affecting settlement or naturalisation procedures.
Many BN(O) status holders have built their lives in the UK in good faith under this pathway. Ensuring that their route to citizenship remains protected and respected would reaffirm the UK's commitment to fairness, consistency, and historical responsibility.
My key concerns are as follows:
* Impact on Settlement Pathway: The current five-year route to ILR was clearly communicated when the BN(O) scheme was introduced. Extending this to ten years would impose a significant and unexpected delay for thousands of BN(O) families, many of whom have already invested years into settling and integrating in the UK.
* Uncertainty Around Citizenship: Naturalisation is a vital part of our journey to becoming full members of British society. Any delay in obtaining ILR directly impacts our ability to apply for British citizenship, which many of us regard as a key part of our long-term future and identity.
* Language Requirement for Elderly BN(O) Holders: The removal of the current exemption for individuals aged 65 or older from the English language requirement is also of great concern. Many older BN(O) visa holders face genuine and often insurmountable challenges in meeting this requirement, despite having contributed meaningfully to family and community life in the UK. To impose such a condition now would be not only unfair but also contrary to the compassionate spirit in which the BN(O) visa was offered.
In light of the above, I respectfully ask you to:
1. Seek urgent clarification from the Home Office on whether the proposed changes to ILR eligibility will apply to BN(O) visa holders, and what specific measures are being considered to mitigate the impact on this community.
2. Raise these concerns in Parliament, ensuring that the unique nature of the BN(O) route is acknowledged and that the commitments made in 2020 are upheld.
3. Request confirmation from the Government as to whether the proposed removal of the English language exemption for individuals aged 65 and over will apply to BN(O) holders, and highlight the disproportionate effect such a change would have on elderly migrants.
BN(O) status holders have moved to the UK in good faith under a policy that was never intended to be part of standard immigration control. As British nationals, we have entered the UK not as foreigners, but as part of a broader constitutional and historical relationship with this country. It is crucial that this distinction be respected in any future reforms.
I sincerely hope you will lend your support to ensuring fair and consistent treatment for our community. Thank you for your attention to this matter and for representing the interests of all your constituents. I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely, [Your Full Name]
Given this distinct context, I respectfully urge you to ask the Government, through a formal parliamentary question or other appropriate channel, whether the BN(O) visa route will be exempt from any restrictive measures or reclassifications introduced in the recent white paper. Moreover, I kindly request that you advocate for the equal and fair treatment of BN(O) holders in any future considerations affecting settlement or naturalisation procedures.
Many BN(O) status holders have built their lives in the UK in good faith under this pathway. Ensuring that their route to citizenship remains protected and respected would reaffirm the UK's commitment to fairness, consistency, and historical responsibility.
My key concerns are as follows:
* Impact on Settlement Pathway: The current five-year route to ILR was clearly communicated when the BN(O) scheme was introduced. Extending this to ten years would impose a significant and unexpected delay for thousands of BN(O) families, many of whom have already invested years into settling and integrating in the UK.
* Uncertainty Around Citizenship: Naturalisation is a vital part of our journey to becoming full members of British society. Any delay in obtaining ILR directly impacts our ability to apply for British citizenship, which many of us regard as a key part of our long-term future and identity.
* Language Requirement for Elderly BN(O) Holders: The removal of the current exemption for individuals aged 65 or older from the English language requirement is also of great concern. Many older BN(O) visa holders face genuine and often insurmountable challenges in meeting this requirement, despite having contributed meaningfully to family and community life in the UK. To impose such a condition now would be not only unfair but also contrary to the compassionate spirit in which the BN(O) visa was offered.
In light of the above, I respectfully ask you to:
1. Seek urgent clarification from the Home Office on whether the proposed changes to ILR eligibility will apply to BN(O) visa holders, and what specific measures are being considered to mitigate the impact on this community.
2. Raise these concerns in Parliament, ensuring that the unique nature of the BN(O) route is acknowledged and that the commitments made in 2020 are upheld.
3. Request confirmation from the Government as to whether the proposed removal of the English language exemption for individuals aged 65 and over will apply to BN(O) holders, and highlight the disproportionate effect such a change would have on elderly migrants.
BN(O) status holders have moved to the UK in good faith under a policy that was never intended to be part of standard immigration control. As British nationals, we have entered the UK not as foreigners, but as part of a broader constitutional and historical relationship with this country. It is crucial that this distinction be respected in any future reforms.
I sincerely hope you will lend your support to ensuring fair and consistent treatment for our community. Thank you for your attention to this matter and for representing the interests of all your constituents. I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely, [Your Full Name]
打咁長篇做乜撚野
浪費時間
直接問BNO Visa你咩取態仲好啦
浪費時間
直接問BNO Visa你咩取態仲好啦
支持10+1, 趕絕黃種chingchong中國間諜
支持
國家安全，最重 希望 前公務員或者紀律部隊完全拒絕申請
我支持10+1喎
反正都長住英國 住多5年又有咩所謂
反正都長住英國 住多5年又有咩所謂
你蝗蟲黎？
反正都長住有咩問題
其實拿到PR又點？
你永遠唔係白皮膚
社會地位根本冇變
你永遠唔係白皮膚
社會地位根本冇變
咁鳩長仲要全部人一樣
返香港自首啦⋯⋯
唔好搞咁多
唔好搞咁多
支持10+1 你唔鐘意咪返香港囉
返支那
越多人寫咪即係話比人聽打算拎完bc就走
咁人地緊加想10+1
咁人地緊加想10+1
英國可以遊行㗎,你唔知㗎咩？
我支持100+1
香港人去到海外唔會搞呢D野
燒到埋身先會理
燒到埋身先會理
真
正如留喺中國香港
永遠都唔會根正苗紅
正如留喺中國香港
永遠都唔會根正苗紅
同幾年前一樣，冇bno既人幫左你地先，等你地上左岸再幫返冇bno既人？
Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.
10 + 1就10 + 1啦，反正都長住
10 + 1就10 + 1啦，反正都長住
抵死 信英國佬
Go back to your country ching chong
應承我 每晚8點打開窗敲鑼打鼓 表達訴求