東張個T21老母都古古怪怪

假設私家都見到男+positive 咁就會同返個老母講返相對應既風險 男bb既話會有機會有咩病 再等個老母自己去決定抽唔抽

公院不嬲睇轉介信再自己檢查有啲on9真係唔識扮識

T21喎你了解下先啦
公立度完頸皮有嘢都係叫你做t21

樓主你古怪啲
人地老母比個醫畜誤診已經好down
仲話人地古怪
好鬼

T21喎你了解下先啦
公立度完頸皮有嘢都係叫你做t21

再問一下
男同女會唔會影響風險
e.g女就醫生講果d ，男唔係，不過都會係唐，而且機率好高

定係女風險超高，男可能0.0001%／中左影響都唔大，大致正常建康冇問題

都係個句 威院唔會拎你份t21黎作準
而且由頭到尾都無提過威院有睇過份報告
呢樣野係你自己假設出黎

通常醫生都會trace private report，唔會唔睇T21 report 比comment。

咁又點叫你做完t21都係有問題之後
都係會返返去做羊穿
最後都係要做返自己個流程

呢D咁貼心貼身的野，一定要搵多兩個醫生睇

醫生都係人，係人就會錯

樓主應該就係喺中大醫院負責覆email 嗰條柒頭

唔好癲啦
而家抽得羊水嘅人幾乎都係t21 positive
如果唔睇呢份report直頭無ground去抽羊水

根據條片講既野 個病就得女bb先會有
男bb就無提及 但應該唔會係同一種病

如果度頸皮有問題，t21無問題咪唔抽囉

如果唔睇t21 report 咁唔洗抽羊水啦照超聲波都無表徵同有jj

T21 基本上無咩可能錯性別 你話照都可以手指當JJ睇
佢仲要片話係女仔黎 我信個媽媽多d

咁有問題都係會返去做羊穿

T21 唔係會直接係份report 寫 男定女 既咩？

佢份部分Y chromosome 果句真係寫得衰既
醫生就一定睇錯報告，但係冇因為咁而做咗額外嘅檢查。

病人有產後抑鬱，係因為T21 報告唔正常，唔係因為講錯BB 性別

我認為醫生需要向病人道歉，不過唔需要懲罰，因為後續處理方案都係正確合理

係啊
會少左人需要做羊穿，減少流産風險

大家睇清楚d 東張quote個份野先屌人

我問過AI個醫生解讀又唔錯晒wor, 個report寫得衰, 但係的確暗示緊係無Y chromosome:

Why It Likely Means No Y Chromosome DNA While the statement alone doesn’t explicitly say "no detectable Y chromosome DNA," here’s why that’s the most likely interpretation:

Context of the test:

NIPT is designed to screen for fetal sex and sex chromosome abnormalities. If Y chromosome DNA were present (indicating a male fetus), the test would typically note it, especially in a report addressing chromosome abnormalities. The lack of any positive mention of Y chromosome DNA suggests it wasn’t detected.

Related findings:

Your query mentions a "decrease in DNA from Chromosome X," which could point to Turner syndrome (X0), a condition with one X chromosome and no Y chromosome. If no Y chromosome DNA was detected, this fits with the absence of a "quantitative aberration" in Y chromosome DNA—there’s simply none there to be abnormal.

Maternal contribution:

The test also mentions a "high possibility of maternal contribution," meaning maternal DNA (which lacks a Y chromosome, as the mother is female) may dominate the sample. If fetal Y chromosome DNA were present, it should still be detectable despite maternal DNA, since the mother has no Y chromosome to interfere. The fact that no aberration was detected reinforces that no Y chromosome DNA was found.

其實男仔x reduction 仲大鑊

醫生錯左就緊
但嚴重程度有別

已知positive
1.男女都會有病（可以係不同既病），而且嚴重程度相約，都應該要抽羊水confirm。醫生有責任，但媽媽都唔好太執著，冇事就好。

2.男唔會有病，女先會有。醫生好大責任。

3.男女都會有病但男機率底好多。醫生好大責任。

因為淆囉，
段片只係影到有把聲，把聲係咪用自個醫生口其實無證明到

上到庭 連環境證據 都唔知做唔做到

事主當然就主張自己有精神捐失，金錢捐失
但要證明到係個女醫生醫療判斷失誤導致

份報告無錯，就係個醫生講錯，要證明佢講錯的唯一有力證據就係段片
相信佢老公聽到都唔當人證啦，兩個關係咁密秘，法庭點接納

男如果x chromosome 有事
仲大鑊

T21 只係針對某幾隻 有99.9% 準
有好多病都係檢測唔到，我覺得主要驗下係咪唐氏就算
再者，驗完無事 出世有事 都可以話基因突變