美股認真討論區MMMMCMLXXXII

・Roselia910・

1001 回覆
0 Like 1 Dislike
GOGL 2025-04-09 20:26:48
all sell off, china and all country de- dxy, de- us Treasury and all

usdhkd depeg ?


metal_brrr 2025-04-09 20:28:04
大枝豬豬豬 2025-04-09 20:28:21
已經無咩討論空間
債息失控,向上飛就要fed QE頂
trump唔出招安撫返個market就等收皮

人在香港既可以考慮借錢放銀行
博佢地唔“準”call loan
有錢買資產+通脹升值

JJ紅撚(amzn100) 2025-04-09 20:29:11
呢啲呢幾年拜登已經做緊
飛雲再起 2025-04-09 20:29:13
如果要de,今輪嘅行情係最合理
GOGL 2025-04-09 20:29:44
treasury, stonks, currency, paper gold, commodity future (oil)

all leverage “pseudo“ asset

only gold and silver, and SB is real asset

我講咗啲咩你自己理解下

吱吱喳喳 2025-04-09 20:29:51
Buongiornovita. 2025-04-09 20:29:59
T車轉燈
小八貓咪 2025-04-09 20:30:06
美國總統特朗普
回應中國加徵關稅
稱是個好機會
讓企業搬到美國
單打不怕多 2025-04-09 20:30:26

啲錢返去美國公司! 升!!!
GOGL 2025-04-09 20:30:49
physical gold and physical silver

人類史上最去撚架嘅兩種期貨就係

gold and silver !!!!!!

我講撚咗啲咩你哋自己理解下
不信騰 2025-04-09 20:31:06
飛雲再起 2025-04-09 20:31:28
港樓同深圳樓應該趨向無溢價
完全無關的事 2025-04-09 20:32:08
冚球鏟
JJ紅撚(amzn100) 2025-04-09 20:32:10
有乜資產諗得過?
肥先大隻 2025-04-09 20:32:13
跌唔落
GOGL 2025-04-09 20:32:25
ccp and HKSAR only one method
1997, 2015, everytime

夾隔夜息, HIBOR
呃Post扣分 2025-04-09 20:32:26
傻侵仲話想上總統山,維尼都揪唔贏
用緊2蚊搭車 2025-04-09 20:33:03
個個都賣,得返邊個買,國債呢啲咁大型嘅嘢國家級拋售都要人接貨先得
Buongiornovita. 2025-04-09 20:33:38
上完下屆拆返
GOGL 2025-04-09 20:33:38
完全無關的事 2025-04-09 20:33:50
點夠996食樹皮鬥
0關稅咪算
啲下欄野係要判出去
點會搵美國佬自己做
林祖舜 2025-04-09 20:34:04
經新加坡 走私返中國
和平使者 2025-04-09 20:34:05
Hyperinflation from tariffs alone seems unlikely to hit Cagan’s 50%-per-month mark. Tariffs increase prices, but historical data—like the 2018-2019 U.S.-China trade war—suggest a modest inflationary bump (0.3% over two years). Even with broader tariffs now, estimates suggest a 0.2 to 0.8 percentage point rise in U.S. inflation annually, far from hyperinflationary levels. For China to trigger something closer to hyperinflation via Treasuries, it’d need to dump its holdings en masse, and even then, the Federal Reserve could counter by adjusting its balance sheet or rates. Plus, China’s own economy would suffer—its remaining bonds would lose value, and its export-driven model relies on stable U.S. demand.

On the flip side, if hyperinflation did hit (say, from a massive money supply surge unrelated to tariffs), Treasury bondholders—China included—would see their investments gutted in real terms. Debtors, including the U.S. government, would benefit as the real debt burden shrinks, but the broader economic fallout (e.g., savings wiped out, currency collapse) would dwarf any tariff-related tensions. China might hesitate to escalate via bond sales, knowing it’d be a mutually assured economic hit.
In short, while tariffs on China and its Treasury holdings can stoke inflation and rattle bond markets, they’re unlikely to spark Cagan-style hyperinflation on their own. The real value of Treasuries would take a hit in such an extreme scenario, but the U.S.-China economic entanglement suggests both sides have incentives to avoid pushing it that far.

正向交易專家 2025-04-09 20:34:34
準備
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞