主旨：嚴正譴責星島日報對【元朗文氏三爺孫命案】不實揣測之報導
敬啟者：
本人對貴報近日刊登有關【元朗文氏三爺孫命案】的報導深感憤慨。該報在未有充分證據佐證的情況下，竟將焦點放在疑似兇手——僅19歲的孫兒身上，並將其所謂因協助祖父處理與發展商官司而感到巨大壓力，進而導致慘劇及自殺的說法大肆炒作，完全忽略了案件中的多項事實與複雜情節。
具體而言，貴報不僅輕率推測殺人動機，更將家族內部矛盾及土地糾紛等議題牽強附會，試圖以胡亂猜測來博取眼球。這種毫無根據、充滿煽動性的報導，不僅誤導了社會公眾，也對受害者家屬造成極大傷害，更可能影響警方後續調查，嚴重損害了新聞行業的專業形象與公信力。
作為具社會影響力的媒體，貴報應恪守事實求是與審慎查證的原則，而非為了追求轟動效應而濫用未經核實的資訊。本人在此嚴正要求貴報立即對該報導中的不實與揣測內容作出公開道歉，並採取有效措施，杜絕今後再出現類似不負責任的報導。
敬請重視，並盼迅速回應。
此致
敬禮
[您的姓名]
[聯絡方式]
寄去
info@singtao.com
info@stheadline.com
［正義］大家一齊投訴星島日報屈個孫殺人
牛軍已掠地
41 回覆
62 Like
10 Dislike
我先
美
美
你寄信去公司度投訴返間公司
私人公司好恰啲，費事國安法啦
Subject: Formal Condemnation of Sing Tao Daily’s Baseless Speculation on the “Yuen Long Man Family Three-Generations Tragedy”
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to express my profound indignation regarding your recent publication on the “Yuen Long Man Family Three-Generations Tragedy.” Without presenting sufficient corroborative evidence, your report irresponsibly concentrated on a single suspect—a 19-year-old grandson—asserting that the immense pressure he purportedly experienced while assisting his grandfather in a legal dispute with a property developer led to this tragic incident and his subsequent suicide. Such reporting completely disregards several crucial facts and the complex nuances of the case.
Specifically, your publication not only rashly speculated on the motive behind the homicide but also forcefully conflated intra-family conflicts and land disputes in an attempt to generate sensational headlines. This unfounded and incendiary reporting misleads the public, inflicts severe harm on the bereaved family, and potentially jeopardizes ongoing police investigations. It undermines both the professionalism of the journalism industry and the public’s trust in responsible news reporting.
As a media outlet with significant societal influence, you are expected to adhere to the principles of factual accuracy and thorough verification—not to exploit unverified information for sensationalism. I hereby demand that you issue a public apology for the inaccuracies and baseless speculations contained in your report, and take immediate corrective measures to ensure that such irresponsible reporting does not recur.
I trust you will treat this matter with the utmost seriousness and look forward to your prompt response.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Contact Information]
英文版
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to express my profound indignation regarding your recent publication on the “Yuen Long Man Family Three-Generations Tragedy.” Without presenting sufficient corroborative evidence, your report irresponsibly concentrated on a single suspect—a 19-year-old grandson—asserting that the immense pressure he purportedly experienced while assisting his grandfather in a legal dispute with a property developer led to this tragic incident and his subsequent suicide. Such reporting completely disregards several crucial facts and the complex nuances of the case.
Specifically, your publication not only rashly speculated on the motive behind the homicide but also forcefully conflated intra-family conflicts and land disputes in an attempt to generate sensational headlines. This unfounded and incendiary reporting misleads the public, inflicts severe harm on the bereaved family, and potentially jeopardizes ongoing police investigations. It undermines both the professionalism of the journalism industry and the public’s trust in responsible news reporting.
As a media outlet with significant societal influence, you are expected to adhere to the principles of factual accuracy and thorough verification—not to exploit unverified information for sensationalism. I hereby demand that you issue a public apology for the inaccuracies and baseless speculations contained in your report, and take immediate corrective measures to ensure that such irresponsible reporting does not recur.
I trust you will treat this matter with the utmost seriousness and look forward to your prompt response.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Contact Information]
英文版
推
助紂為虐嘅小人星島日報最為人不恥
助紂為虐嘅小人星島日報最為人不恥
幫手推吓啦
Subject: 關於貴媒體報導「元朗文氏三爺孫命案」的疑問
尊敬的編輯/記者先生/女士，
近日貴媒體報導「元朗文氏三爺孫命案」，詳述案件細節，並在警方調查尚未完成、法庭亦未經審理的情況下，頻頻暗示甚至直指孫兒文浩朝為兇手。讀者不禁好奇，貴媒體是否掌握了警方未公開的鐵證，還是僅憑「消息稱」與「探員私下分析」這類模糊說法，就已經判定一個逝者的罪行？
在新聞報導的基本倫理與法律框架下，對未經審理的案件作出這種明確指控，是否符合傳理學專業的基本原則？在大學新聞或傳理課程裡，應該有提及「無罪推定」的概念，亦強調媒體報導需謹慎、客觀，避免誤導公眾及對當事人家屬造成二次傷害。不知貴媒體是否對這些概念有所遺忘，還是另有考量？
當然，新聞從業者工作繁忙，未必有時間重新翻閱課本。但若對這些基本原則仍有疑問，建議抽空補補課，或者至少請教一下法律界人士，以確保報導不會過早作出定論，而影響公眾對案件的理解，甚至可能構成誹謗風險。
期待貴媒體對此作出回應，亦盼未來的報導能更嚴謹持平，真正體現新聞專業的價值。
順祝
工作順利
[您的名字]
尊敬的編輯/記者先生/女士，
近日貴媒體報導「元朗文氏三爺孫命案」，詳述案件細節，並在警方調查尚未完成、法庭亦未經審理的情況下，頻頻暗示甚至直指孫兒文浩朝為兇手。讀者不禁好奇，貴媒體是否掌握了警方未公開的鐵證，還是僅憑「消息稱」與「探員私下分析」這類模糊說法，就已經判定一個逝者的罪行？
在新聞報導的基本倫理與法律框架下，對未經審理的案件作出這種明確指控，是否符合傳理學專業的基本原則？在大學新聞或傳理課程裡，應該有提及「無罪推定」的概念，亦強調媒體報導需謹慎、客觀，避免誤導公眾及對當事人家屬造成二次傷害。不知貴媒體是否對這些概念有所遺忘，還是另有考量？
當然，新聞從業者工作繁忙，未必有時間重新翻閱課本。但若對這些基本原則仍有疑問，建議抽空補補課，或者至少請教一下法律界人士，以確保報導不會過早作出定論，而影響公眾對案件的理解，甚至可能構成誹謗風險。
期待貴媒體對此作出回應，亦盼未來的報導能更嚴謹持平，真正體現新聞專業的價值。
順祝
工作順利
[您的名字]
今日既頭版倫常慘劇案但係你將焦點放響佢粒孫嗰度
近日貴媒體報導「元朗文氏三爺孫命案」，詳述案件細節，並在警方調查尚未完成、法庭亦未經審理的情況下，頻頻暗示甚至直指孫兒文浩朝為兇手。讀者不禁好奇，貴媒體是否掌握了警方未公開的鐵證，還是僅憑「消息稱」與「探員私下分析」這類模糊說法，就已經判定一個逝者的罪行？
在新聞報導的基本倫理與法律框架下，對未經審理的案件作出這種明確指控，是否符合傳理學專業的基本原則？在大學新聞或傳理課程裡，應該有提及「無罪推定」的概念，亦強調媒體報導需謹慎、客觀，避免誤導公眾及對當事人家屬造成二次傷害。不知貴媒體是否對這些概念有所遺忘，還是另有考量？
在新聞報導的基本倫理與法律框架下，對未經審理的案件作出這種明確指控，是否符合傳理學專業的基本原則？在大學新聞或傳理課程裡，應該有提及「無罪推定」的概念，亦強調媒體報導需謹慎、客觀，避免誤導公眾及對當事人家屬造成二次傷害。不知貴媒體是否對這些概念有所遺忘，還是另有考量？
關咩事
想問下佢人都死左
仲有咩屈唔屈
咪咁多事啦
聽日唔洗返工咩
聽日唔洗返工咩
星島記者？
人都死左
唔差在將強姦90歲阿婆都屈埋落去係咪？
人都死左
唔差在將強姦90歲阿婆都屈埋落去係咪？
問下你就係星島記者呀？
咁講英文係咪美國總統呀
咁講英文係咪美國總統呀
九唔搭八
係咪老羞成怒？
係咪老羞成怒？
冇冇冇
入黎見識有咩咁正義姐
入黎見識有咩咁正義姐
以為你有咩證據證明個孫清白
你又咪老屈緊星島
你又咪老屈緊星島
程序正義、無罪推定呢d係高級少少既概念（中三水平）
對你可能係難明少少架啦
對你可能係難明少少架啦
程序正義、無罪推定呢d係高級少少既概念（中三水平）
對你可能係難明少少架啦
對你可能係難明少少架啦