[錶撚入] 擺低你哋戴緊嘅錶 (143)

開始仲以為買左假野
點知有呢個問題先係真野

想問下巴打
Breitling navitimer 既錶耐唔耐用？
依家諗緊買佢定係omega seamaster

咩叫耐唔耐用
所有有錶保養得好都好耐用

之不過，越多複雜功能越易壞係一定，任何牌子都係
越高hz越易磨損都係事實

要粗戴撞極都唔爛嘅話
eta芯，勞，tudor，呢啲芯係實淨好多
不過都好睇你點戴
你日日戴住隻deepsea沖涼嘅話都一樣會入水會壞

點解dresswatch一定係要薄
薄定厚先係斯文其實好睇襯唔襯嗰個人

Google咗以下.

What defines a dress watch?
These timepieces were created to be worn with formal and business attire, so that they wouldn't interrupt the fit of a suit jacket with unsightly bunching. A slim profile, that can easily slip under a cuff, is perhaps the most important attribute of a dress watch. Watches of this style should be less than 15mm thick.

佢個suggestion make sense
15mm即係iwc pilot chrono都仲差0.5mm先boundary
gs邊算厚
10mm樓下根本就好撚薄，唔係人人戴都靚

俾意見咁梗係講個人諗法，唔通又每句利申各花入各眼咩清
10mm叫好撚薄我就唔多同意啦，不過呢d野拗黎冇乜意思

Tank dumont正牙，不過有種感覺新入坑買返圓形錶易入囗d
利申：各花入各眼，大家睇法唔同，最緊要自己buy

大小三針，10mm及格線，8mm啱feel

Breitling d 錶用唔用到10 年以上？
勞太貴買唔起
Tudor 同omega seamaster 邊個好啲？

正常嚟講
所有牌子用十幾年以上都唔會壞嘅
大路款真係冇邊隻係會幾年就入一次廠

都要睇報局同size
近年有啲出到40mm嘅
太薄反而會好空咁隻錶
以前36嗰啲就真係8mm先得

反而我覺得佢寫15mm有啲搞笑
厚過15mm唔容易 勁 bulk

係，全部都係睇樣子如何，你話RM係dresswatch都得，好似Jeremy Strong，我唔覺得佢唔斯文

學你咁講，要睇埋襯唔襯個個人，完全唔洗討論，係討論區點知大家咩樣咁generally dresswatch係要薄是真既，厚過10又真係稱唔上薄喎

清
唔係想駁你嘴
但厚度同空唔空關咩事

好似呢隻咁，如果我話俾你聽佢15mm佢空唔空
8mm嘅話又算唔算空


又好似呢隻咁，雖然係靚但確實有dd空，但主要係因為佢index 短，又關唔關佢厚度事？

清有d道理
以後求錶意見一律要求自拍+三圍+wrist shot

清
唔想駁你嘴，但5227真係唔靚

不過空定唔空都唔代表隻錶靚定唔靚既

睇下moser gang都唔錯

Rg ivory dial還好吧？佢個Hunter case都好撚正
不過Patek確實有更好嘅選擇 e.g. 6119

patek越舊越有味道

同意你 唔一定薄過10mm先可以叫dress watch
但問題係sbga211 個設計真係唔太斯文
dress watch 要襯皮帶先啱feel
sbga 211 似datejust 嗰類比較casual風格嘅日用錶多啲

唔係話唔俾＞10mm係dress watch, 而係唔ideal啫
我當211配條皮帶，bezel又厚lug又厚感覺差咁d唔夠elegant. 同埋個人意見個pr針真係…jm9
上面話fit in the cuff呢樣我覺得都緊要丫，imagine 隻錶太厚卡住衫袖成件事唔靚咁… 做大個cuff當然可以解決問題，但咁就變件shirt / suit唔靚，好似著oversize 咁


再退多N步好似上面位清有自己諗法15mm都dress watch咁當然OK，睇下問嗰位清自己決定is ok