英超球證David Coote因辱罵利物浦與高普影片流出而遭停職！！！
AjstylesP1
299 回覆
95 Like
4 Dislike
你講得出var點運作未？
When will VAR be used in Premier League matches?
The VAR is constantly monitoring the match.
VAR is used only for "clear and obvious errors" or "serious missed incidents" in four match-changing situations: goals; penalty decisions; direct red-card incidents; and mistaken identity.
But factual decisions such as offsides, and the issue of whether a player is inside or outside the penalty area, are not subject to the "clear and obvious" test.
If the VAR sees an error has been made in such a situation they will intervene, regardless of how marginal the decision is.
There is a high bar for the VARs to intervene on subjective decisions, to maintain the pace and intensity of matches.
How does it work?
For subjective decisions, either the referee informs the VAR that a decision should be reviewed or the VAR identifies a “clear and obvious error” in one of the four match-changing situations and communicates this to the referee.
At the next stoppage of the match, the referee will hold up the restart of play until a decision has been reached.
The referee explains their decision to the VAR, and what they have seen from the pitch.
The VAR reviews the broadcast footage, using as many angles as possible. Real-time replays will be used initially to check for intensity. Slow-motion replays will be used to identify the point of contact.
If the VAR’s view does not agree with what the referee believes they have seen then they can recommend an overturn
The VAR is constantly monitoring the match.
VAR is used only for "clear and obvious errors" or "serious missed incidents" in four match-changing situations: goals; penalty decisions; direct red-card incidents; and mistaken identity.
But factual decisions such as offsides, and the issue of whether a player is inside or outside the penalty area, are not subject to the "clear and obvious" test.
If the VAR sees an error has been made in such a situation they will intervene, regardless of how marginal the decision is.
There is a high bar for the VARs to intervene on subjective decisions, to maintain the pace and intensity of matches.
How does it work?
For subjective decisions, either the referee informs the VAR that a decision should be reviewed or the VAR identifies a “clear and obvious error” in one of the four match-changing situations and communicates this to the referee.
At the next stoppage of the match, the referee will hold up the restart of play until a decision has been reached.
The referee explains their decision to the VAR, and what they have seen from the pitch.
The VAR reviews the broadcast footage, using as many angles as possible. Real-time replays will be used initially to check for intensity. Slow-motion replays will be used to identify the point of contact.
If the VAR’s view does not agree with what the referee believes they have seen then they can recommend an overturn
我洗鬼你copy and paste番官網上嘅野?
去返上面講嘅雲迪克幾季前重傷嘅碰撞中，因為越位在先而未有判罰碧福特
1. 無判罰碧福特係邊個決定?
2. 越位在先係邊個係邊個決定?
去返上面講嘅雲迪克幾季前重傷嘅碰撞中，因為越位在先而未有判罰碧福特
1. 無判罰碧福特係邊個決定?
2. 越位在先係邊個係邊個決定?
你又要問VAR點運作 官網解釋咪最official
紅字Highlight 埋俾你
VAR is used only for "clear and obvious errors" or "serious missed incidents" in four match-changing situations: goals; penalty decisions; direct red-card incidents; and mistaken identity.
But factual decisions such as offsides, and the issue of whether a player is inside or outside the penalty area, are not subject to the "clear and obvious" test.
If the VAR’s view does not agree with what the referee believes they have seen then they can recommend an overturn
Quote 返你嗰段
即使VAR翻看後決定是越位，都可以再看那記攔截，並向碧福特出示紅牌。
紅字Highlight 埋俾你
VAR is used only for "clear and obvious errors" or "serious missed incidents" in four match-changing situations: goals; penalty decisions; direct red-card incidents; and mistaken identity.
But factual decisions such as offsides, and the issue of whether a player is inside or outside the penalty area, are not subject to the "clear and obvious" test.
If the VAR’s view does not agree with what the referee believes they have seen then they can recommend an overturn
Quote 返你嗰段
即使VAR翻看後決定是越位，都可以再看那記攔截，並向碧福特出示紅牌。
首先，果段野唔係我嘅，係#225貼出嚟，我再quote嚟用。
第二，上面我問2條問題正正係因為我quote左呢段野，但無人答我，咁我就再問你：
1. 「VAR翻看後決定是越位」係邊個嘅決定/判決？
2. 要「再看那記攔截，並向碧福特出示紅牌。」嘅話，咁應該係由邊個球證去做？
第二，上面我問2條問題正正係因為我quote左呢段野，但無人答我，咁我就再問你：
1. 「VAR翻看後決定是越位」係邊個嘅決定/判決？
2. 要「再看那記攔截，並向碧福特出示紅牌。」嘅話，咁應該係由邊個球證去做？
咁我假設你認同先會quote 嚟用
兩個問題都可以睇返我quote official 嗰段
VAR is used only for "clear and obvious errors" or "serious missed incidents" in four match-changing situations: ….direct red-card incidents
判越位 VAR同意 呢度無爭議
而家failed 個位係VAR球證冇去睇係咪 serious missed incidents , situation 係 direct red card incidents
所以應該由VAR球證提出嗰記攔截應該係紅牌 再由主球證判斷是否紅牌
兩個問題都可以睇返我quote official 嗰段
VAR is used only for "clear and obvious errors" or "serious missed incidents" in four match-changing situations: ….direct red-card incidents
判越位 VAR同意 呢度無爭議
而家failed 個位係VAR球證冇去睇係咪 serious missed incidents , situation 係 direct red card incidents
所以應該由VAR球證提出嗰記攔截應該係紅牌 再由主球證判斷是否紅牌
第2 咪var 要call球證睇
Var唔叫 球證睇片咪唔知 有嚴重犯規囉
等同禁區內手球
球證睇唔到 var球證咪要出聲囉
Var唔叫 球證睇片咪唔知 有嚴重犯規囉
等同禁區內手球
球證睇唔到 var球證咪要出聲囉
罵利物浦咪算 條撚樣比人拍片踢爆吸毒咁癲
好似哥連拿咁講
球證係場上係孤獨
無任何人支持佢
球證係場上係孤獨
無任何人支持佢
比油王用毒品控制
基於我覺得你睇唔明英文，我將以下呢段餵畀google translate 再畀你望多次
If the VAR’s view does not agree with what the referee believes they have seen then they can recommend an overturn = 如果 VAR 的觀點與裁判認為他們所看到的不一致，那麼他們可以建議推翻
If the VAR’s view does not agree with what the referee believes they have seen then they can recommend an overturn = 如果 VAR 的觀點與裁判認為他們所看到的不一致，那麼他們可以建議推翻
基於我覺得你睇唔明英文，我將以下呢段餵畀google translate 再畀你望多次
If the VAR’s view does not agree with what the referee believes they have seen then they can recommend an overturn = 如果 VAR 的觀點與裁判認為他們所看到的不一致，那麼他們可以建議推翻
If the VAR’s view does not agree with what the referee believes they have seen then they can recommend an overturn = 如果 VAR 的觀點與裁判認為他們所看到的不一致，那麼他們可以建議推翻
原來你真係弱智
你呢個例子喺而家嘅香港相信係冇問題
繼續講都嘥氣
我真係比唔上連如果/IF都唔識嘅利迷
見你咁蠢 咁我直接d
var,球證同意主球證判決嘅話
咪唔會叫佢去睇var囉
var,球證同意主球證判決嘅話
咪唔會叫佢去睇var囉
見你唔肯正面答我
等我就提供答案啦
下面係Michael Oliver 講嘅：
"Ultimately, even with VAR, it's still my decision. I'm the one who makes the decision on the field. And if I get it right first time around, there is no reason for VAR to get involved. Now that I can go and watch on a pitchside monitor, you've got a second chance, too. You can change your mind or stick with it.
source: https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12184035/virgil-van-dijk-referee-michael-oliver-admits-mistake-over-jordan-pickford-tackle-on-liverpool-defender
等我就提供答案啦
下面係Michael Oliver 講嘅：
"Ultimately, even with VAR, it's still my decision. I'm the one who makes the decision on the field. And if I get it right first time around, there is no reason for VAR to get involved. Now that I can go and watch on a pitchside monitor, you've got a second chance, too. You can change your mind or stick with it.
source: https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12184035/virgil-van-dijk-referee-michael-oliver-admits-mistake-over-jordan-pickford-tackle-on-liverpool-defender
你個source 咪完全解答咗你自己嘅問題
個article入面Michael Oliver有講
“…We should have restarted with the offside, as we did, but with a different punishment for Jordan Pickford."
你紅字嗰段 “…if I get it right first time around, there is no reason for VAR to get involved’”
「如果我第一次嘅決定係啱，就無需涉及VAR」
而家佢賽後就係話應該要紅而冇紅
識得用個 if/如果 未？
個article入面Michael Oliver有講
“…We should have restarted with the offside, as we did, but with a different punishment for Jordan Pickford."
你紅字嗰段 “…if I get it right first time around, there is no reason for VAR to get involved’”
「如果我第一次嘅決定係啱，就無需涉及VAR」
而家佢賽後就係話應該要紅而冇紅
識得用個 if/如果 未？
所以咪話你弱智囉
你依個回覆咪正正話緊var球證錯囉
依個攔截係一個紅牌動作
Var 球證睇到慢鏡 理應叫球證睇
Var 咁都同意咪即係var有問題囉
主球證都話睇左片 覺得要俾紅
正常var係睇到慢鏡
所以上面巴打咪答左你
所以應該由VAR球證提出嗰記攔截應該係紅牌 再由主球證判斷是否紅牌
你依個回覆咪正正話緊var球證錯囉
依個攔截係一個紅牌動作
Var 球證睇到慢鏡 理應叫球證睇
Var 咁都同意咪即係var有問題囉
主球證都話睇左片 覺得要俾紅
正常var係睇到慢鏡
所以上面巴打咪答左你
所以應該由VAR球證提出嗰記攔截應該係紅牌 再由主球證判斷是否紅牌
利狗仔又出黎扮victim牙
上咁耐連登你真係算最弱智
我都費事同弱智嘈
哂去同你隊垃圾執骨啦
我都費事同弱智嘈
哂去同你隊垃圾執骨啦
我指出赤裸裸嘅事實
令你無地自容，無法反駁話
而你嘅能力只能夠講兩三句粗言穢語
作為空洞而無力嘅還擊
令你無地自容，無法反駁話
而你嘅能力只能夠講兩三句粗言穢語
作為空洞而無力嘅還擊