石油根本無窮無盡，用石油先係最環保

為咗提高討論嘅level 大家提出啲xx研究 xx學說嗰陣 不如加個quotation俾個出處黎睇睇好啵

堂堂一個大科學家都俾啲傻鳩話玩偽科學

對比返地球嘅歷史
人類嘅連1分鐘都不如
點解你會咁自大覺得自己影響到地球
地球點都唔會玩完人類玩完咋嘛

你真係冇改錯名

一開始啲人認為地球係平嘅添
唔知我search到嗰個Mendeleev 係咪你所講嗰個門捷列夫
US Department of Energy 有個conference 係講佢嘅
https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2020/conf/fermilab-conf-20-031-ad-apc.pdf
入面只有一段仔提及佢提出嘅石油起源

"Mendeleev also studied petroleum origin and concluded hydrocarbons are abiogenic and form deep within the earth via reaction of water with iron carbide "The main fact to note is that petroleum was born in the depths of the earth, and it is only there that we must seek its origin in" [Ref 19]. The abiogenetic model was later further supported by many, including V.Vernadsky, but nowadays it is generally not well accepted by the scientific community which mostly stands by increasingly sophisticated biogenetic models of formation of hydrocarbon deposits in nature.
"

而家已經有更好嘅理論去解釋 （石油前身kerogen 係由啲好微細嘅organic matter 例如花粉 藻類等 deposit 喺海底/湖底形成 呢啲kerogen喺合適温度壓力下會"煮"到石油/天然氣出嚟 ）
keywords: petroleum origin/ formation 之類 喺google scholar 度揾會好過就咁google 廢事你唔知睇埋啲農場文

請重讀f4 chemistry

我淨係知 好似樓主呢種戇鳩仔
多到根本無窮無盡

點解（問吓）

屍體十零日就化曬得返排骨，定係你想講化石變石油？

溫室效應產生嘅熱可以谷返落地心
永續石油能源循環

其實我都係咁樣覺得
地球入面自己不斷整出嚟
但講出嚟比fd笑到仆街

咁搞法
石油價格變咗負700一桶唔止

溫室效應加埋啲天災人禍產生嘅屍體可以慢慢壓返落地心再續石油

推到咁高得唔得架

呢到不嬲都行 trust me bro

我心諗邊有咁多恐龍呀，話咩石油係恐龍化石出黎都忽忽地

幾十億年又點，你計下要死幾多隻恐龍先支持到有咁多石油呀，再去睇下全球每日消耗緊幾多桶石油

細個係睇恐龍書學，小學常識有教咩

應該話，，如果石油係恐龍有機物變出黎，點解恐龍化石個啲位係乾燥而不是俾啲油浸住，同埋掘化石個深度遠不及鑽探深度。

Mendeleev 就係我所講既門捷列夫
我會提起佢係因為我係好多
Abiogenic petroleum origin既學術文章都會見到人地reference exactly 你quote 出黎個句 我的確唔夠嚴謹。

但係我主張既唔係邊個先係岩
我主張既係石油的確可以係非生物主張形成

石油+核能根本夠用, 根本係啲撚屌阻膠戇鳩
環保? 得窮人環保, 班有錢佬繼續私人飛機日日草飼牛
我做咩唔攬炒?

邊有咁多恐龍

石油產品出現先大大方便人類嘅生活，淨係膠飲管已經係偉大嘅產品。

而家要減少使用石油，即係玩自己，紙飲管又貴質素又差，仲要斬樹先至整到，咁樣同我講話環保

過多廿年真係證實到石油係無窮無盡，即刻兜巴星死啲環保冚家剷 。

全球暖化定極端天氣呀
可唔可以夾定口供先

我岩岩上網search完
主流講法都係動物屍體
National geographic 都咁講

但我由細到大都覺得 邊有咁多動物屍體
屍體死左唔係會腐化咩

依家日日成個百萬桶油出產緊