The OpenCL test went just as well, if not even better. The Radeon 890M GPU (which, as we assume, was wrongly labeled as the Radeon 880M) scored 41,995 points, putting it on par with the desktop version of Nvidia’s GTX 1650 Ti or the mobile version of the RTX 2050. It also beats the last-gen Radeon 780M by a whopping 40%.AMD 890M 快 780M 四成 等如 GTX 1650 / RTX 2050
EXTINCTIONBB
20 回覆
6 Like
0 Dislike
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.digitaltrends.com/computing/amd-ryzen-ai-benchmarks-leaked/
高通打羅打鼓出粒廢U俾人恥笑
下年初粒40CU APU先至恐怖係咪之前話有4060等級嗰隻？
等緊嗰隻 乜原來唔係890m
等緊嗰隻 乜原來唔係890m有4060 真係諗得過, 滿足大部份需求 
前提都係要慳電
前提都係要慳電
無錯，ARM 起哩方面強項， 恥笑Qcom前睇埋功耗先
慳電做咩先？ 本身係咪真係咁耗電先
電費你開少啲冷氣好過
電費你開少啲冷氣好過
係續航同發熱問題
40CU個粒兩樣樣野黎啦
120W laptop賣皮幾兩皮
已經唔同巿場
120W laptop賣皮幾兩皮
已經唔同巿場
book 4 edge 8500 抵玩
要慳電用ipad啦ARM windows 唔上唔落咁, 乜鳩都要模擬
最大問題重要唔係平你話三四千蚊一部ARN windows平板買嚟當玩具玩都好
萬鳩幾蚊買部電子垃圾都唔知為乜
780M唔係已經一早吹到=1650咩？
我都等睇嗰粒iGPU乜料
係 其實780m好似gaming效能同1650一樣咁制 理論跑分就輸少少咁
其實780m好似gaming效能同1650一樣咁制 理論跑分就輸少少咁你地係咪搞錯左1060同1650
同級應該4060 laptop GPU
唔係desktop
唔係desktop
超RAM 後是同1650差唔多
果粒未出
890M 16CU 2900Mhz
果粒strix halo 40CU
890M 16CU 2900Mhz
果粒strix halo 40CU
I see 好期待
好期待