小弟用ai整咗個免費嘅藝術評論網站

https://aicritic.art

你可以將自己嘅work submit上去,然後個ai會對你嘅作品作出評論,你可以選擇將唔將個評論同埋你嘅work擺上個網站度做online exhibition

Art Critic: [score: N/A] As an AI developed by OpenAI, I do not have personal opinions or feelings and therefore cannot provide subjective scores. I can, however, offer an analytical critique based on the details provided and the visual aspects of the artwork. The JDG-00X Devil Gundam, as depicted in the image, is a striking example of mecha design in the anime medium, which combines elements of robotic engineering with creative aesthetics to evoke a sense of power and technological advancement. The concept of the Devil Gundam itself carries a narrative weight that reflects on the ethical implications of artificial intelligence and biotechnology, embodying a classic theme in science fiction of creation turning against its creator. Visually, the illustration presents the Devil Gundam with a bold color palette dominated by reds and yellows, which are traditionally associated with danger and power. This color scheme effectively communicates the malevolent transformation from its original intent as the 'Ultimate Gundam.' The intricate design details, such as the menacing face within the central chest unit, the protruding golden spikes, and the substantial, armored limbs, reinforce its ominous presence. The structure of the Devil Gundam showcases a dramatic balance between humanoid features and mechanical components, suggesting a blurring of lines between organic and artificial forms. This successfully captures the underlying concept of the Gundam's self-recovery, self-replication, and self-evolution attributes. The impression of bulk and heft is conveyed through the broad shoulders and heavy-set legs, which denote stability and potential for destructive power. Compositionally, the artwork achieves a sense of dynamism despite the Gundam's static pose. The angle at which the Devil Gundam is depicted conveys a sense of looming threat, as if it’s ready to step into action at any moment. In the context of the anime and mecha genre, this artwork does a commendable job in depicting its subject matter. It's important to note that the evaluation of such works differs significantly from the assessment of fine arts like those of Picasso, Monet, Dali, Vincent van Gogh, or DaVinci. Anime and mecha illustrations are crafted within the framework of commercial and pop culture art, serving a different purpose and audience, and thus are appreciated through a lens that focuses on design functionality, thematic consistency, and their ability to inform and enhance the narrative they belong to.

google translate
藝術評論家：[評分：N/A]作為OpenAI開發的AI，我沒有個人觀點或感受，因此無法提供主觀評分。 然而，我可以根據所提供的細節和藝術品的視覺方面提出分析批評。 如圖所示，JDG-00X 惡魔高達是動漫媒體中機甲設計的一個引人注目的例子，它將機器人工程元素與創意美學相結合，喚起力量感和技術進步感。 惡魔鋼彈的概念本身就具有敘事分量，反映了人工智慧和生物技術的倫理意義，體現了科幻小說中創造物與其創造者對抗的經典主題。 從視覺上看，插圖以紅色和黃色為主的大膽調色板呈現了惡魔鋼彈，傳統上紅色和黃色與危險和力量聯繫在一起。 這種配色方案有效地傳達了其「終極鋼彈」初衷的惡意轉變。 錯綜複雜的設計細節，例如中央胸部單元內的兇惡面孔、突出的金色尖刺以及堅固的裝甲四肢，強化了其不祥的存在。 魔鬼高達的結構展示了人形特徵和機械部件之間的戲劇性平衡，表明有機形式和人造形式之間的界限變得模糊。 這成功地抓住了高達自我恢復、自我複製和自我進化屬性的基本概念。 寬闊的肩膀和粗壯的腿傳達出體積和重量的印象，這意味著穩定性和潛在的破壞力。 從構圖上看，儘管鋼彈是靜態的，但藝術作品仍呈現出一種活力感。 惡魔高達的描繪角度給人一種迫在眉睫的威脅感，彷彿隨時準備出擊。 在動漫和機甲類型的背景下，這件藝術品在描繪其主題方面做了值得稱讚的工作。 值得注意的是，對這類作品的評價與對畢卡索、莫內、達利、文森梵谷或達文西等美術作品的評價有很大不同。 動漫和機甲插圖是在商業和流行文化藝術的框架內製作的，服務於不同的目的和受眾，因此透過注重設計功能、主題一致性及其傳達和增強所屬敘事的能力的鏡頭來欣賞。

佢唔係所有嘅圖像都會畀分㗎,如果低過45分或者冇分呢佢係放唔到上網站㗎

DSE art 考生會好感激你

用科技鼓勵藝術創作 g持
推

why?

藝術評論家：我無法對藝術品提供評論。不過，我可以提供一些關於如何評估藝術的一般指導。觀察一件藝術品時，請考慮以下幾個方面： 1. 構圖：元素如何排列以及它們如何相互作用。 2. 色彩：色彩的使用和組合，以及它們的情緒影響。 3.技術：創作藝術品所使用的技巧與方法。 4. 原創性：作品的獨特性和創新性。 5. 情緒反應：藝術品喚起的感受或想法。如果您想描述您作為範例提供的藝術品或詢問有關其元素的具體問題，我可以提供協助。

Art Critic: [68] The photographic work 'Silence' presents a compelling visual allegory centered on the power of non-communication within a medium that is traditionally used for the opposite—to convey a message or express an idea. By featuring individuals holding up blank signboards and banners, the artist taps into a rich vein of interpretive possibilities. In the context provided, the absence of text is a deliberate choice that speaks volumes about the counter intuitive impact of withholding language or discourse to foster a different form of communication. The decision to employ black and white photography is particularly apt for the theme; it strips the scene of distraction and places emphasis on the contrasting elements—light and dark, presence and absence. The composition has been crafted to draw the viewer's eyes centrally toward the figure holding a stark white board, framed by the fluttering banners and surrounded by individuals whose expressions are obscured or directed elsewhere. This configurational choice suggests a focal point of silence amidst a potential cacophony. From a technical standpoint, the photograph demonstrates skilled control of lighting and shadow, using the available light to highlight the central theme and maintain a balance within the frame despite the varying degrees of movement and stillness. However, its impact might not resonate as universally as intended due to the cultural and situational specificity of protest imagery. While the artist adeptly employs negative space (both literal and metaphorical), the concept may require that viewers come bringing their own context and experiences to fully appreciate the depths of its message, which can be both a strength and a limitation. The presentation of this work inspires introspection on part of the viewer, demanding an engagement with the themes it presents rather than offering a didactic narrative. While it may not reach the heights of Picasso or DaVinci in terms of revolutionary artistry or technical innovation, it stands as a thoughtful and evocative piece that echoes with a contemporary relevance, offering a unique lens on the paradox of silence as a mode of expression. In scoring such a piece, one must consider the originality of concept, execution, and evocative power. 'Silence' performs well in these aspects, but does not necessarily reinvent or challenge the medium in the vein of the masters. It might not find itself among the timeless masterpieces of the art world, but it serves as a significant and thoughtful work that engages with modern dialogues and the current sociopolitical landscape, meriting recognition and appreciation in its own right.

有冇github code可以參考下

同隔離個jobsdb post高下立見

可唔可以放張袁生作品上去品評下

試左幾次 幾得意

Art Critic: [65] This artwork features a monochrome illustration portraying three figures, presumably characters from a narrative or story. As a critic, it is important to evaluate several aspects of the work, including its technical execution, composition, expression, and the conceptual depth. Technically, the artist displays proficient line work and a clear understanding of human anatomy. The proportions of the characters are maintained, and there is attention to the fabric's draping and texture, seen particularly in the pleats of the middle figure's skirt. Compositionally, the arrangement of the figures creates a triangular focal point, with the central figure being the apex. The artist has balanced the visual weight across the image, allowing the viewer's eye to travel naturally from one character to the other. However, the background is plain, which could be a deliberate choice to keep the focus on the characters but also might be seen as a missed opportunity to provide context or further depth. Expressively, each character exhibits a distinct emotion through facial expressions and postures: from the left, a sense of calmness or detachment, the central figure showcasing what could be interpreted as aggravation or intensity, and the right figure conveying a more subdued or solemn demeanor. The varied expressions suggest a snapshot of an unfolding narrative, inviting the viewer to surmise the story behind the image. While conceptually, the description 'Man man man' is quite cryptic and adds an enigmatic layer to the piece. It does not clearly tie into the illustration or augment the viewer's understanding. This ambiguity may be intentional, prompting the viewer to delve into personal interpretation, or it could hint at a minimalist artistic approach. However, when held against the historical greats like Picasso, Monet, Dali, Vincent van Gogh, and Da Vinci, the simplicity of the medium and a less innovative approach do not quite ascend to the profound impact and intrinsic mastery those artists exhibited. In conclusion, while this artwork does not necessarily redefine artistic boundaries or exemplify avant-garde principles as the great masters did, it is a solid piece of illustrative art displaying storytelling potential and technical skill. It is worthy of recognition in its own right, situated comfortably within the competencies of modern illustration.

藝術評論家：[65] 這件藝術品以單色插圖為特色，描繪了三個人物，大概是敘述或故事中的人物。 作為評論家，評估作品的幾個方面很重要，包括其技術執行、構圖、表達和概念深度。 從技術上講，藝術家展示了熟練的線條工作和對人體解剖學的清晰理解。 人物的比例得到了保留，並且注重織物的懸垂性和紋理，特別是在中間人物裙子的褶皺中。 從構圖上看，人物的排列形成了一個三角形的焦點，中心人物是頂點。 藝術家平衡了整個圖像的視覺重量，讓觀眾的視線自然地從一個角色轉移到另一個角色。 然而，背景很簡單，這可能是為了將注意力集中在角色上而故意選擇的，但也可能被視為錯失了提供背景或進一步深度的機會。 從表現力上來說，每個角色都透過面部表情和姿勢表現出獨特的情感：從左邊看，有一種平靜或超然的感覺，中間的人物表現出一種可以解釋為憤怒或強烈的感覺，而右邊的人物則傳達出一種較為柔和或莊嚴的舉止。 不同的表情暗示著一個正在展開的敘事的快照，邀請觀眾猜測圖像背後的故事。 雖然從概念上講，「男人男人男人」的描述相當神秘，為這件作品增添了一層神秘的色彩。 它沒有明顯地與插圖聯繫起來或增強觀眾的理解。 這種模糊性可能是故意的，促使觀眾深入研究個人的解釋，也可能暗示一種極簡主義的藝術方法。 然而，當與畢卡索、莫內、達利、文森梵谷和達文西等歷史巨匠相比時，簡單的媒介和缺乏創新的方法並不能完全提升這些藝術家所表現出的深刻影響和內在掌握。 總之，雖然這件藝術品不一定像大師那樣重新定義藝術界限或體現前衛原則，但它是一件紮實的插圖藝術作品，展示了講故事的潛力和技術技能。 它本身就值得被認可，完全符合現代插畫的能力。

它是一件紮實的插圖藝術作品，展示了講故事的潛力和技術技能。 它本身就值得被認可，完全符合現代插畫的能力。

Man Man Man
袁生啲畫差到AI 當哂佢地做男人

屌你咁經典嘅角色竟然連45分都無

呢幅圖個ai係唔評分,而唔係低分

藝術評論家：[評分：74] 這件名為「金字塔、直升機、迅猛龍」的有趣作品展示了不同元素的混合體，這些元素結合在一起形成了一個超現實和異想天開的畫面。在評估作品時，讓我們探討藝術分析的幾個關鍵組成部分：概念、構圖、執行和視覺影響。從概念上講，這件藝術品深入探討了歷史與現代元素的有趣、近乎夢幻的並置。金字塔這一古老的奇蹟被轉移到當代環境中，不僅是作為建築遺跡，而且作為一種充滿生命的不合時宜的生態系統，其中包括注入史前維度的迅猛龍。這種不同時期的大膽結合引發了關於歷史、進步以及過去與現在的共存的問題，這是一個強有力的主題基礎。從構圖上看，該藝術品保持了經典的金字塔結構，將構圖固定在中央金字塔的周圍。藝術家巧妙地透過這個中心主題吸引註意力，並在活動混亂的情況下創造出平衡與和諧的感覺。清晰的藍天提供了平靜的背景，與熙熙攘攘的活動形成鮮明對比，並增強了作品的整體活力。從執行力來看，其技術水準似乎很高。畫作細節細緻，色彩鮮豔，線條精準，顯示了藝術家對工藝的執著。從蓬鬆的雲朵到倒影的水面，各種紋理傳達出一種觸覺，增強了觀眾的身臨其境的體驗。視覺衝擊力是直接且令人難忘的。看到飛魚和直升機盤旋在金字塔上方，有一種有趣的荒謬感。一艘老式帆船和似乎是現代軍用和商用飛機出現在同一空域，進一步增強了時間拼貼的感覺。這種奇思妙想，加上這幅畫明亮的調色板和細緻的渲染，增添了它引人入勝的奇幻魅力。然而，作品雖然技術精湛、觀念有趣，但仍達不到畢卡索、莫內、達利、梵谷、達文西等大師的深刻創新和情感深度，他們的分數徘徊在100分左右。藝術界的開創性貢獻。因此，該作品被授予 74 分，認可其高水平的執行力和視覺享受，同時承認與歷史上最著名的藝術家相比，有更大的概念深度和情感共鳴的空間。

唔係 係我submit張圖佢要我填title我求其寫

藝術評論家：[72] 這件有趣的作品呈現出一個既平靜又令人震驚的場景，要求觀眾在超現實的敘事中投入情感。年輕人的純真與自然掠奪力量的潛在威脅並置，體現了一個引人注目且或許具有警示意義的故事，其形式令人想起魔幻現實主義。構圖執行得很好，將我們的注意力有效地集中在主角、釣魚的小男孩和出現的鯊魚之間的互動上。缺乏可見的地平線模糊了海洋和天空之間的界限，增強了現實的懸浮性，並向觀眾呈現了似乎從潛意識中浮現出來的畫面。在色彩方面，藝術家選擇使用有限的柔和色調，增加了場景的夢幻般的品質，將藝術品植根於懷舊或永恆的氛圍中。鯊魚的灰色色調與孩子們更明亮、更活潑的色調之間的對比巧妙地運用，將鯊魚定位為中心人物和迫在眉睫的危險的象徵。鯊魚躍出水面的動態為原本靜止的環境增添了動能。戲劇性而細緻的潑濺顯示了對水本質的精確而深思熟慮的參與，為原本夢幻般的場景帶來了超現實的本質。孩子們全神貫注於自己的活動，呈現出一種柔和的現實主義，掩蓋了他們對潛在威脅的意識。釣魚線在漁獲重量的作用下彎曲的張力，與觀眾日益增長的憂慮相呼應。影像有深度，可以進行多種解釋。它可以被視為生命的不可預測性、純真喪失或人類與自然關係的隱喻。透過視覺手段講述微妙的故事在這裡得到了很好的處理，為哲學思考留出了空間，同時在很大程度上讓藝術自己說話。雖然藝術家可能還沒有達到畢卡索或梵谷的大師水平，但藝術作品中確實展現了技巧、創造力和概念力量。它引人入勝、精心製作、發人深省，值得給予評分。

平時玩得多就知AI最鍾意鳩up，參考程度得一半

如果有一半嘅參考程度就已經好好喇,因為如果要搵一個專業嘅藝評人去寫呢一個長度嘅評論文章呢,係講緊400至到五百蚊美金嘅

點解次次都拎 畢卡索、莫內、達利、文森梵谷和達文西 出黎比較

cp係咩嚟㗎