ps5連ff13都下埋架
rdr2 xsx有4k，ps5得1440p
[突發] 微軟關閉多個Bethesda工作室
LegendarioSnake
473 回覆
112 Like
9 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁
對舊game support ps5唔係差過xsx咩？
ps5連ff13都下埋架
rdr2 xsx有4k，ps5得1440p
ps5連ff13都下埋架
rdr2 xsx有4k，ps5得1440p
仲好意思整個咁嘅list
軟粉真係
軟粉真係ps5同ps4玩唔番到ps3碟games(除非你有ps3)
XSX for 4K只係for部份360同xbone games，唔係隻隻都for
M$最應該出喺PS5嘅HD版game係Dead Rising 3先啱
XSX for 4K只係for部份360同xbone games，唔係隻隻都for
M$最應該出喺PS5嘅HD版game係Dead Rising 3先啱
Gears of War 4 5咪搞(不了)
我想要Bloodborne Remastered
張圖居然冇最重要既Halo
仲記得以前有整個list話PS5無game
連上古6都list出黎當一定會出係佢地獨佔既
唔知依家炒晒啲人仲出唔出到呢
連上古6都list出黎當一定會出係佢地獨佔既
唔知依家炒晒啲人仲出唔出到呢
呢個時間梗係深潛啦 唔等到索做柒事點群空出擊
依隻世紀垃圾根本冇人想理
屌你
MS洗完大錢收購之後堆第一方game依然一鑊柒過一鑊
依家連為數不多可以拎黎吹奏下嘅hi-fi rush都殺埋工作室
不如成個部門摺柒左佢算啦
MS洗完大錢收購之後堆第一方game依然一鑊柒過一鑊
依家連為數不多可以拎黎吹奏下嘅hi-fi rush都殺埋工作室
不如成個部門摺柒左佢算啦
好玩同好賣2件事黎 咁大間公司有哂盤數睇
唔賺就執柒佢架啦
唔賺就執柒佢架啦
做男人就應該有啲擔當 推個女人出嚟頂真係唔知個醜字點寫 就算唔係Phil哥都應該係Matt Booty出嚟頂啦大佬
答到九唔搭八， 咁大間公司冇公關先做好預設答案？
要搞好成個平台邊可以隻隻都諗賺大錢
點都要有hi-fi rush呢類做招牌賺口啤
何況hi-fi rush條數都唔係好失禮
而且MS呢頭Cut完間野轉個頭訪問已經話想要整有口啤嘅小規模遊戲
根本就自打嘴巴
點都要有hi-fi rush呢類做招牌賺口啤
何況hi-fi rush條數都唔係好失禮
而且MS呢頭Cut完間野轉個頭訪問已經話想要整有口啤嘅小規模遊戲
根本就自打嘴巴
軟粉日日吹奏嘅gamepass夠唔賺啦
呢條問題根本必問 微軟PR竟然唔準備定答案
3百萬玩家都賺唔到
不如成個Xbox執左佢
https://x.com/tango_jpn/status/1691818390246056187?s=61&t=EBx_OHIlDfP9AYc25x2e_w
不如成個Xbox執左佢
https://x.com/tango_jpn/status/1691818390246056187?s=61&t=EBx_OHIlDfP9AYc25x2e_w
老實講隻game都唔係話特別好玩，只不過係對比其他屎黎講叫做正常game一隻，如果要比錢就一定唔會買
There are two reasons why all those Bethesda studios closed, and neither of them have anything to do with Bethesda (directly)...
Game Pass and Activision.
The biggest paradox with Game Pass is that basically every game that launches on the service badly misses its sales goals. Makes sense though, why pay full price to buy a game when you can play it for "free" as part of your subscription? This is accounted for somewhat by attributing portions of revenue to top-performing Game Pass games every month, but there are factors working against games. Namely, the fact that most games don't stay at the top of the chart for more than a month or two, and also that Game Pass growth has stagnated. So games like Hi-Fi Rush, which is incredible mind you, gets a very small bump in revenue from being the hot Game Pass game for a month, then it falls off a cliff when everyone moves onto the next thing. Poor Redfall had it even worse since it launched so rough, it never had a chance.
This system was fine for a while when Game Pass was growing like gangbusters, but now it's slowed way down and the amount of revenue it's attributing to games isn't keeping up with the budgets to make them.
But, all that wouldn't have mattered even 3 or 4 years ago because back then Xbox was basically a rounding error on Microsoft's books. The division made some money, but more importantly, it didn't cost that much and other parts of the business easily covered the gap. Then Xbox went on a buying spree and spent a lot of money on Bethesda, but orders of magnitude more on Activision. Now, the Eye of Sauron has turned, and Xbox is expected to start making that $70B back, or at least cut expenses to the bone (and then some) while they try.
That brings us back to Game Pass. So far, the big bets on driving new subscriptions (Redfall, Starfield) haven't spurred near enough growth, and there's not much on the horizon that is likely to restart the momentum. The best bet is COD, but do you really risk the guaranteed sales revenue that franchise brings by putting it on Game Pass on Day 1 and potentially lose massive sales? I don't know what the plans are, but either you put it on Game Pass and lose money, or you don't and the subscribers revolt because they think that's what they signed up for.
COD will be fine though, as will the other mega-studios with huge IPs, but you're seeing the impact; all those smaller studios making really interesting games are going to fall away, simply because as good as games like Hi-Fi Rush are, they're never going to make enough money to make up that $70B hole that Xbox now has to dig itself out of.
Game Pass and Activision.
The biggest paradox with Game Pass is that basically every game that launches on the service badly misses its sales goals. Makes sense though, why pay full price to buy a game when you can play it for "free" as part of your subscription? This is accounted for somewhat by attributing portions of revenue to top-performing Game Pass games every month, but there are factors working against games. Namely, the fact that most games don't stay at the top of the chart for more than a month or two, and also that Game Pass growth has stagnated. So games like Hi-Fi Rush, which is incredible mind you, gets a very small bump in revenue from being the hot Game Pass game for a month, then it falls off a cliff when everyone moves onto the next thing. Poor Redfall had it even worse since it launched so rough, it never had a chance.
This system was fine for a while when Game Pass was growing like gangbusters, but now it's slowed way down and the amount of revenue it's attributing to games isn't keeping up with the budgets to make them.
But, all that wouldn't have mattered even 3 or 4 years ago because back then Xbox was basically a rounding error on Microsoft's books. The division made some money, but more importantly, it didn't cost that much and other parts of the business easily covered the gap. Then Xbox went on a buying spree and spent a lot of money on Bethesda, but orders of magnitude more on Activision. Now, the Eye of Sauron has turned, and Xbox is expected to start making that $70B back, or at least cut expenses to the bone (and then some) while they try.
That brings us back to Game Pass. So far, the big bets on driving new subscriptions (Redfall, Starfield) haven't spurred near enough growth, and there's not much on the horizon that is likely to restart the momentum. The best bet is COD, but do you really risk the guaranteed sales revenue that franchise brings by putting it on Game Pass on Day 1 and potentially lose massive sales? I don't know what the plans are, but either you put it on Game Pass and lose money, or you don't and the subscribers revolt because they think that's what they signed up for.
COD will be fine though, as will the other mega-studios with huge IPs, but you're seeing the impact; all those smaller studios making really interesting games are going to fall away, simply because as good as games like Hi-Fi Rush are, they're never going to make enough money to make up that $70B hole that Xbox now has to dig itself out of.
踩Xbox 還踩xbox，依隻game喺動作game上點都係top tier ,加埋配合音樂成個過程玩得好c伏，有以前PS2年代嗰種純粹嘅遊戲feel
又話軟趴趴大把錢燒嘅~ 仲話燒到索尼破產 點知索尼未破產不特止 仲有錢周圍收購Paramount同Infocom
佢就反而要將自己啲廠商執笠
佢就反而要將自己啲廠商執笠
老老實實,執果堆工作室既遊戲,無一隻岩我玩