[數撚圍爐區] E=mc^2+AI (100)

1001 回覆
5 Like 2 Dislike
2024-04-22 23:58:30
2024-04-23 00:08:21
中東王子單野爭d 咩野
2024-04-23 00:09:20
2024-04-23 00:09:44
2024-04-23 00:10:06
2024-04-23 00:11:05
2024-04-23 00:11:23
2024-04-23 00:19:28
2024-04-23 00:19:42
2024-04-23 00:20:34
2024-04-23 00:24:50
2024-04-23 00:25:18
見個lab 9 成人係波斯人
咩玩法
2024-04-23 00:26:09
2024-04-23 00:26:33
2024-04-23 00:26:49
2024-04-23 00:27:42
2024-04-23 00:37:32
但明明係加拿大
2024-04-23 00:46:30
2024-04-23 01:23:20
2024-04-23 01:48:24
好單一wor
2024-04-23 03:39:36
2024-04-23 03:42:47
2024-04-23 05:58:23
2024-04-23 06:26:27
2024-04-23 11:41:01
Kevin Church, PhD (He/Him) • 3rd+ Quantitative Analyst | Applied Mathematician
1h
(edited)
I don't see the benefit of pumping more tax money into a system that a) likely won't produce more tax revenue long-term, and b) doesn't necessarily produce valuable research. Keeping scholarships pegged to inflation would be fine, and they are overdue for a bump. However, the system needs an overhaul beyond simply boosting grad student/postdoc salaries.

More degrees does not necessarily correlate to more lifetime earnings. It's an open secret that science chases fads and hot topics in search of grant money (read: tax dollars). What ever happened to string theory, eh?

All this student/postdoc funding commitment guarantees is that the value of graduate degrees continues to be eroded due to oversupply, the same way bachelor's degrees have become a baseline requirement for nearly every entry-level position.


數撚夠坦白
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞