WhyWhyHK
2024-03-11 18:54:44
<判決關注組 - 是十二碼嗎?>
老實講, 琴晚奧利華既執法水平係唔錯, 基本上可以爭議既點唔多, 如果唔計最後一個爭議性既畫面, 我甚至覺得係近年英超相對高質既大戰執法.
只可惜, 最後都仍然難逃爭議, 對於杜古踼麥卡里士打心口一腳, 究竟係應該判十二碼? 應該冇事? 定應該反過黎判麥卡里士打心口碎腳底? 坊間爭議都幾大!
當中認為唔應該判十二碼既, 大部分論點都係: "杜古踼到個波先喎!"
呢到我先要講一句, 踼到個波先, 唔等於食左無敵幸運星代表你點踼人都冇事, 呢點一定要搞清楚! (近年唔知點解總係有人覺得踼到個波先係等於免FOUL金牌, 其實大把例子係中波先仍然會吹罰既)
我講之前, 先聽下前球證甸恩點講:
"I think he's touched the ball Doku but with the follow through he's caught him right in the chest. I think it could be a penalty. It's a massive decision by the VAR. Tiny touch on the ball, but the follow through's caught him on the ribcage," Dean told Sky Sports."
"I wouldn't be surprised if Stuart sent him to the screen. Check's complete. Obviously played the ball first and the follow through same as I'm guessing a normal coming together. He's very, very fortunate in my opinion there Doku."
以上係甸恩發言, 佢明確指出, 中波唔係無敵, 因為佢之後既動作係有踼中麥卡里士打, 所以呢個動作係有權比十二碼!
當中甸恩特別提到杜古同個波接觸輕微, 呢點我覺得亦係判斷十二碼與否既重點,
因為球波我認為係五五波, 杜古其實係完全冇掌握球權, 杜古要出腳踼到咁高去解圍, 就要確保出腳冇危險, 而唔係完全唔理對面用心口控緊波而直接用腳踼埋去, 餘勢同埋中波中得清唔清脆係非常重要, 如果球波係杜古明顯解圍左後麥卡里士打先撞埋去, 咁當然唔會係十二碼, 但睇返慢鏡, 兩者基乎係同時, 就係麥卡里士打準備控波前既0.1秒杜古就將隻腳踼埋去, 係呀, 佢快0.1秒踼走個波, 但佢做左一個危險動作去踼走而且個危險動作係中晒人, 呢個係不容忽視既事實!
當然, 總有人會話, 但杜古踼中唔係好大力, 冇大力踩落去, 不如咁講, 如果大力踩埋落去, 就紅得啦! 呢球危險動作加踼中, 點都最少值個黃! 覺得傷害性不大既, 可以出黎比我踼一腳, 咪知危唔危險囉!
最後放埋段出自死敵加利仔既一段:
"I think he could be trouble, I think Doku could be in trouble. I think Doku could be in trouble. Watch the follow through there. I think that’s… well he’s completed the check. I think he’s a lucky, lucky boy,"
加利仔都忍唔住叫杜古做幸運仔! 因為杜古呢球出腳係非常魯莽, 正常同樣既波, 除非去到身死存亡既位置 (例如門前護空門之類), 球證先會對呢類魯莽而危險既出腳較寛鬆處理.
但杜古那個位置根係冇必要亦冇急切性咁樣危險出腳, 正常情況唔少防守球員都會選擇埋身收窄麥卡里士打射波角度, 甚至在麥卡里士打控波時用身體適當加力去食一食麥卡里士打個位置令佢控唔到落黎或出現控球失誤, 當然, 杜古要選擇危險動作搏一搏亦未嘗不可, 但用得危險動作踼到人, 就理應承擔應有苦果, 黃牌加十二碼!
睇到呢度, 如果仍然堅持踼到波先冇犯規, 或者換個角度去諗, 如果調轉攻方麥卡里士打出腳踼中杜古, 你認為球證會覺得踼到波先而唔吹咩? 我都幾肯定百分百會吹麥卡里士打, 仲應該食埋黃牌!
亦因為以上原因, 雖然我唔認為呢球係100%無容置疑既十二碼 (最少唔判總會搵到解釋). 但我更傾向係認為需要判十二碼既, 如果計返英超尺度, 大概判與唔判之間, 大約係七三同八二比咁上下, 十次入面應該有七至八次會判!
不過其實當時睇直播時我係知唔會判, 因為近完場, 而且係榜首大戰, 同場利記仲要已經有一個十二碼, 我就唔認為佢地會夠膽判了.
P.S.
出完文後再睇到卡頓堡意見, 再貼埋出黎做補充:
"The ball bounces up. Alexis Mac Allister moves towards it. Jeremy Doku’s foot is high. He catches Mac Allister in the chest.
"Outside of the box, this would have resulted in a free-kick, every day of the week. Just because it happened inside the box does not suddenly transform it into a clean challenge when Mac Allister might be left playing connect the dots on his chest on Monday morning.
"Referee Michael Oliver missed it in real-time at the end of an exhausting and exhilarating contest and so it was on VAR Stuart Attwell to intervene. This is where the frustration lies – we have seen similar incidents this weekend where Stockley Park should have told their colleagues on the ground that they had missed a penalty or a red card but didn’t."