雞蛋高牆論本來就唔係任何情況都可以應用仲有將一個文人言論當左係真理根本就係反智
雞蛋高牆論講白左就係撐少數派 撐民眾派
但係世上好多事都唔係民眾或少數就一定值得撐和同情
民眾亦有分多數少數原教旨主義夠係少數啦 恐怖佈子支持者夠係民眾 高牆就係歐美政府
唔通又要撐?
村上春樹雞蛋高牆論只係用來呃下傻仔
月供VOO專家
51 回覆
70 Like
24 Dislike
雞蛋高牆論本來就唔係任何情況都可以應用仲有將一個文人言論當左係真理根本就係反智
雞蛋高牆論講白左就係撐少數派 撐民眾派
但係世上好多事都唔係民眾或少數就一定值得撐和同情
民眾亦有分多數少數原教旨主義夠係少數啦 恐怖佈子支持者夠係民眾 高牆就係歐美政府
唔通又要撐?
齊撐劉馬車
一起感動
一起感動
雞蛋係指無力還擊, 一打就碎
巴勒斯坦人無還擊之力咩 有槍有炮
如果打唔贏人就算係雞蛋咁中國對美國都係雞蛋
有槍有炮 如果打唔贏人就算係雞蛋咁中國對美國都係雞蛋
所以中國 巴勒斯坦唔係雞蛋law
村上春樹原文
“Between a high, solid wall and an egg that breaks against it, I will always
stand on the side of the egg.”
“在一座高大堅實的牆和與之相撞的雞蛋之間，我永遠都站在雞蛋這一邊”。
Yes, no matter how right the wall may be and how wrong the egg, I will stand
with the egg. Someone else will have to decide what is right and what is
wrong; perhaps time or history will do it. But if there were a novelist who,
for whatever reason, wrote works standing with the wall, of what value would
such works be?
是的，無論牆是多麼的正確，雞蛋是多麼地錯誤，我都站在雞蛋這一邊。其他人可能會判
斷誰是誰非，也許時間或歷史會來判斷。但是，如果一個小說家無論因何種原因站在牆的
一邊來創造，那麼他的作品的價值何在呢？
What is the meaning of this metaphor? In some cases, it is all too simple and
clear. Bombers and tanks and rockets and white phosphorus shells are that
high wall. The eggs are the unarmed civilians who are crushed and burned and
shot by them. This is one meaning of the metaphor.
這個比喻是什麼意思呢？在有些時候，非常簡單明瞭。轟炸機、坦克、火箭以及白磷彈就
是那堵高牆，雞蛋是被這些武器毀滅、燒傷並擊斃的手無寸鐵的百姓。這就是這個比喻的
其中一層含意。
But this is not all. It carries a deeper meaning. Think of it this way. Each
of us is, more or less, an egg. Each of us is a unique, irreplaceable soul
enclosed in a fragile shell. This is true of me, and it is true of each of
you. And each of us, to a greater or lesser degree, is confronting a high,
solid wall. The wall has a name: it is “The System.” The System is supposed
to protect us, but sometimes it takes on a life of its own, and then it
begins to kill us and cause us to kill others–coldly, efficiently,
systematically.
但是，並不僅僅是這些。它還有更深一層的含意，我們來這樣思考一下，我們中的每一個
人或多或少都是一個雞蛋。我們中的每一個人都是存在於一個脆弱外殼中唯一的、不可替
代的靈魂。我也一樣，對你們中的每一個人也一樣。並且，我們中的每一個人在某種程度
上也都面臨著一堵高大堅實的牆。這個牆有一個名字：那就是“體制”。這個體制本來是要
保護我們的，但是有時候它會呈現出它自己的一面，然後就開始殘殺我們，並使我們去殘
殺他人——冷酷、有效、系統地殘殺。
https://aberliu.wordpress.com/2009/02/26/轉錄：村上春樹在耶路撒冷的英文演講稿（附中文/
“Between a high, solid wall and an egg that breaks against it, I will always
stand on the side of the egg.”
“在一座高大堅實的牆和與之相撞的雞蛋之間，我永遠都站在雞蛋這一邊”。
Yes, no matter how right the wall may be and how wrong the egg, I will stand
with the egg. Someone else will have to decide what is right and what is
wrong; perhaps time or history will do it. But if there were a novelist who,
for whatever reason, wrote works standing with the wall, of what value would
such works be?
是的，無論牆是多麼的正確，雞蛋是多麼地錯誤，我都站在雞蛋這一邊。其他人可能會判
斷誰是誰非，也許時間或歷史會來判斷。但是，如果一個小說家無論因何種原因站在牆的
一邊來創造，那麼他的作品的價值何在呢？
What is the meaning of this metaphor? In some cases, it is all too simple and
clear. Bombers and tanks and rockets and white phosphorus shells are that
high wall. The eggs are the unarmed civilians who are crushed and burned and
shot by them. This is one meaning of the metaphor.
這個比喻是什麼意思呢？在有些時候，非常簡單明瞭。轟炸機、坦克、火箭以及白磷彈就
是那堵高牆，雞蛋是被這些武器毀滅、燒傷並擊斃的手無寸鐵的百姓。這就是這個比喻的
其中一層含意。
But this is not all. It carries a deeper meaning. Think of it this way. Each
of us is, more or less, an egg. Each of us is a unique, irreplaceable soul
enclosed in a fragile shell. This is true of me, and it is true of each of
you. And each of us, to a greater or lesser degree, is confronting a high,
solid wall. The wall has a name: it is “The System.” The System is supposed
to protect us, but sometimes it takes on a life of its own, and then it
begins to kill us and cause us to kill others–coldly, efficiently,
systematically.
但是，並不僅僅是這些。它還有更深一層的含意，我們來這樣思考一下，我們中的每一個
人或多或少都是一個雞蛋。我們中的每一個人都是存在於一個脆弱外殼中唯一的、不可替
代的靈魂。我也一樣，對你們中的每一個人也一樣。並且，我們中的每一個人在某種程度
上也都面臨著一堵高大堅實的牆。這個牆有一個名字：那就是“體制”。這個體制本來是要
保護我們的，但是有時候它會呈現出它自己的一面，然後就開始殘殺我們，並使我們去殘
殺他人——冷酷、有效、系統地殘殺。
https://aberliu.wordpress.com/2009/02/26/轉錄：村上春樹在耶路撒冷的英文演講稿（附中文/
手無寸鐵但係支持緊恐怖份子既百姓又點?
不斷潛伏一旦奪權or有機會就打算滅猶太人既百姓又算唔算係百姓
不斷潛伏一旦奪權or有機會就打算滅猶太人既百姓又算唔算係百姓
你去問村上春樹囉
所以咪講左佢只係一個文人 做咩要將佢d言論當左係宇宙真理
如果伊斯蘭有六個國家都叫雞蛋
我真係唔知咩先係高牆
我真係唔知咩先係高牆
大家唔好一有兩方
就下意識分蛋及牆
就下意識分蛋及牆
你月供voo，有咁多時間就去了下政治先啦
雞蛋與高牆唔係得一個層次，雖然佢都係左。
啲右癌咪只係敢連登講女人係雞，gay佬好噁心囉。
我反對個啲極左，但我唔會話自己右，寧左勿右。
雞蛋與高牆唔係得一個層次，雖然佢都係左。
啲右癌咪只係敢連登講女人係雞，gay佬好噁心囉。
我反對個啲極左，但我唔會話自己右，寧左勿右。
你唔係極右已經係左膠
你唔係極左就係右膠
你唔係極左就係右膠
咁YC…咪唔應該？
呢篇解讀我睇完唔覺有分別，佢將體制視為高牆，個人視為雞蛋又點？
話到明雞蛋錯誤都撐，即係佢自己已經定義咗隻雞蛋係錯，仲選擇企喺錯嗰邊。不如當初改個字眼話會用換位思考，好過而家死兜難兜。
話到明雞蛋錯誤都撐，即係佢自己已經定義咗隻雞蛋係錯，仲選擇企喺錯嗰邊。不如當初改個字眼話會用換位思考，好過而家死兜難兜。
你支持緊一個覺得女人係雞 要殺哂所有gay佬既宗教民族
之後話連登仔係右癌
之後話連登仔係右癌
軟弱的正義
似香港人
似香港人
無知既人 永遠拾人慧齒
但係你連文人都不是喎
「假如這兒有堅固的高牆和撞牆破碎的雞蛋，我總是站在雞蛋一邊。是的，無論高牆多麼正確，雞蛋多麼錯誤，我還是站在雞蛋一邊。」
我的理解係 站在雞蛋一邊 純粹真係站在雞蛋一邊
而唔係支持雞蛋做錯事
例如黃絲燒阿叔 燒阿返係錯 站在黃絲一邊唔係代表支持叔一燒
仲有其他批判係講冇人會(想)去了解雞蛋點解會做錯呢d(錯)事
剩係覺得佢地係惡魔
所以佢自己走去訪問奧姆真理教教徒 了解佢地的諗法
我的理解係 站在雞蛋一邊 純粹真係站在雞蛋一邊
而唔係支持雞蛋做錯事
例如黃絲燒阿叔 燒阿返係錯 站在黃絲一邊唔係代表支持叔一燒
仲有其他批判係講冇人會(想)去了解雞蛋點解會做錯呢d(錯)事
剩係覺得佢地係惡魔
所以佢自己走去訪問奧姆真理教教徒 了解佢地的諗法
都唔使幫佢兜啦
佢講咩都好
我都係撐以㗎啦
佢講咩都好
我都係撐以㗎啦