UO 個限7KG 手提行李殺左好多箱

UO︰「等我食埋呢浸先啦」

所以而家咪罰錢囉
免費你地個個都唔肯, 就罰

去程用有生存空間

去程慳返3舊先, 反正我通常都帶勁小野去日本
有咩全部去到買

回程就寄倉, 或者去donki 買個幾千yen 喼

兩件事黎

咪係比衣啲人玩死左

Uo日常

佢地會同你講你頭頂個格唔係你嘅 係公用地方 佢想放邊就放邊

原意應該係為左俾空姐flexibility去執櫃 如果唔係嘅話空姐就要次次都要個客同意先可以用你頭頂個櫃 執行上唔可能咁做
而唔係為左俾人拎過量hand carry就是但放落其他人頭頂個格

呢啲最L慘，過1-2cm要畀多幾舊

好心就收皮啦
頭先又話用得14kg 好似嘥咗
依家又話錢解決到就算

窮先要諗過度過 又要扮寬佬

我覺得行100ml規定好L on9，驚運毒定爆炸？係的話唔係應該加緊嚴查+加重罰則？限咗ml數就運唔到毒/整唔到爆炸品？

你寫email同IATA講啦

去台灣2-3日，多都搞唔掂

首先呢個係關ICAO唔係IATA事，第二佢哋實施初期已經知但都係照行，毫無人性化可言

Since the introduction of these restrictions, the industry has gone to great lengths to raise the awareness of passengers in advance of their journey, so that they could prepare accordingly. While frequent flyers adapted quickly to the new regime, infrequent flyers continue to arrive at airports with LAGs exceeding the restrictions. This has led to large quantities of personal items being surrendered by passengers at the departure screening points, with the consequential inconvenience, frustration and financial loss. Furthermore, the quantities of items surrendered are not abating, even in airports where the restrictions have been in place for almost a year. Moreover, there are worrying signs which suggest that some passengers are trying to travel with non-compliant items, not with any malicious intent but because they view the restrictions as nonsensical and do not support their imposition.

我就係唔想等行李先唔買

我實施前去 實施後番

我有冇理解錯？

情況一：去check-in淨係拖住個喼，你喺免稅店掃貨都係要一袋過裝晒佢（唔超過7kg）

情況二：去check-in已經拎住hand carry連喼，就算喺免稅店掃貨，買嘅嘢連埋hand carry都係最多7kg都係要放埋一袋

利申買咗30 kg

下屌原來佢哋唔check㗎
我就奇怪點解每次返去條隊都咁長仲諗咁多人都買ufirst

有，係
前排先試完

香港用BNO 直接排U first

講經咩
呢啲係海關查你, 又唔係航空公司查你
海關搜到唔俾過, 你都係得掉咗佢呢個選擇

海關仲有其他方法搜毒同爆炸品, 限液體量只係其中一個措施

航空公司都只係提醒你, 希望少啲機會有客過唔到關結果要unload寄倉行李

每件$500，超重或者過大就買定行李位喇

好撚乞兒呀屌
香港人係咪唔識守規矩？

總之上機果一刻要一件<7kg放頭頂行李+一件無限重放凳底細袋

過埋暑假先啦