唔係有球證話話個防守球員主動玩球就唔當越位咩？
個球例又唔同左？
如果唔係有之前有球證咁解釋過佢判onside既原因我係同意呢球越位的
FIFA女子世界盃2023 [5]
Penny_Oleksiak
1001 回覆
4 Like
4 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
球證係咪想好意頭
中国後衞頂出去，球證當佢哋未攞返控球權，咁Bronze 出返嚟攞波就越位，吹又冇話唔得，5050，所以都睇好耐，仲耐過尋晚Carpenter 嗰球
法國有場波好似比包皮入波，個球證話你唔主動踢個波就越位，問題係你主動踢個波
twitter是死了嗎?
真心睇唔明呢球點解越位 有無ching幫幫手解釋下
當年截波都畜意玩球 頂波解圍點撚樣唔畜意 都痴撚線
佢個妹真是超勁……
快啲強烈譴責啦
聽緊英文旁述
想問鳩猴忠死狗未？
想問鳩猴忠死狗未？
11.2
Offside offence
A player in an offside position at the moment ...
or
gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has:
rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar, match official or an opponent
been deliberately saved by any opponent
*The first point of contact of the ‘play’ or ‘touch’ of the ball should be used.
A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately played* the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage, unless it was a deliberate save by any opponent.
*‘Deliberate play’ (excluding deliberate handball) is when a player has control of the ball with the possibility of:
passing the ball to a team-mate;
gaining possession of the ball; or
clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it)
If the pass, attempt to gain possession or clearance by the player in control of the ball is inaccurate or unsuccessful, this does not negate the fact that the player ‘deliberately played’ the ball.
The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player was in control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have ‘deliberately played’ the ball:
The ball travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it
The ball was not moving quickly
The direction of the ball was not unexpected
The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control
A ball moving on the ground is easier to play than a ball in the air
只能講判唔會話誤判，但判onside嘅都冇大問題
Offside offence
A player in an offside position at the moment ...
or
gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has:
rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar, match official or an opponent
been deliberately saved by any opponent
*The first point of contact of the ‘play’ or ‘touch’ of the ball should be used.
A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately played* the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage, unless it was a deliberate save by any opponent.
*‘Deliberate play’ (excluding deliberate handball) is when a player has control of the ball with the possibility of:
passing the ball to a team-mate;
gaining possession of the ball; or
clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it)
If the pass, attempt to gain possession or clearance by the player in control of the ball is inaccurate or unsuccessful, this does not negate the fact that the player ‘deliberately played’ the ball.
The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player was in control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have ‘deliberately played’ the ball:
The ball travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it
The ball was not moving quickly
The direction of the ball was not unexpected
The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control
A ball moving on the ground is easier to play than a ball in the air
只能講判唔會話誤判，但判onside嘅都冇大問題
呢位同志幾中肯
LJ入到第四球成隻死狗咁冇聲出
法國喺歐國聯決賽憑一個充滿爭議嘅入球捧盃，關於基利安麥巴比喺處於越位位置下入波仍被「成立」，引起球迷對越位條例入面灰色地帶嘅質疑，「受害者」西班牙球員賽後更瘋狂炮轟球證判決，認為有關方面應該修改唔合理嘅越位條例。
完場前10分鐘嗰陣，麥巴比接應迪奧靴南迪斯長傳單刀射入，雖然佢當時明顯越位，但VAR翻查後認為西班牙中堅艾利加西亞曾經出腳攔截，並且將個波改變方向，所以麥巴比拎波已經唔構成越位。艾利加西亞賽後不滿表示：「迪奧靴南迪斯個波傳去我身後面，我就去鏟波，球證話我主動掂波令麥巴比唔係越位，因為規例講明我唔可以掂波，咁我應該由得麥巴比跑去接應？希望有一日呢條規則會修改，但呢個情況令我深受傷害。」奧耶沙巴爾更怒斥訂立規則嘅人：「設立呢條例嘅人肯定未踢過波，艾利加西亞係要解圍，我之前都遇過呢種情況，一定需要改變！」
前西甲球證布魯爾亦唔同意球證判決：「就算艾利加西亞掂波，處於越位位置嘅麥巴比已經干擾緊比賽，所以應該判罰越位。」多位前球證賽後表示，VAR今次判決「依足指引」係正確決定，但同時表示唔認同呢條例嘅精神。
呢場係2021年10月，球例改左未
如果未既話呢應該可以判入
完場前10分鐘嗰陣，麥巴比接應迪奧靴南迪斯長傳單刀射入，雖然佢當時明顯越位，但VAR翻查後認為西班牙中堅艾利加西亞曾經出腳攔截，並且將個波改變方向，所以麥巴比拎波已經唔構成越位。艾利加西亞賽後不滿表示：「迪奧靴南迪斯個波傳去我身後面，我就去鏟波，球證話我主動掂波令麥巴比唔係越位，因為規例講明我唔可以掂波，咁我應該由得麥巴比跑去接應？希望有一日呢條規則會修改，但呢個情況令我深受傷害。」奧耶沙巴爾更怒斥訂立規則嘅人：「設立呢條例嘅人肯定未踢過波，艾利加西亞係要解圍，我之前都遇過呢種情況，一定需要改變！」
前西甲球證布魯爾亦唔同意球證判決：「就算艾利加西亞掂波，處於越位位置嘅麥巴比已經干擾緊比賽，所以應該判罰越位。」多位前球證賽後表示，VAR今次判決「依足指引」係正確決定，但同時表示唔認同呢條例嘅精神。
呢場係2021年10月，球例改左未
如果未既話呢應該可以判入
中國能破蛋嗎? 在歐洲新后腳下入一球英格蘭GK好像好勁的
英格蘭GK好像好勁的內心崇英now630網頁版係咪冇英文
我搵返果單新聞，#442
個情況應該差唔多
個情況應該差唔多
靚到呢
但係繼續下下犯規都幫支兜
To be fair
好過男足
好過男足
The additional wording clarifies the guidelines for distinguishing between ‘deliberate play’ and ‘deflection’ based on the expectation that a player who is clearly in an offside position should not become onside on all occasions when an opponent moves and touches the ball. This wording was published in The IFAB’s circular 26 (July 2022).
條補充係上年新加
條補充係上年新加