你打兩份工三份工 一日可以多千幾二千
但你一日點慳 都係慳得幾十
可以做既係唔亂洗錢，但應洗既都要洗。
其實窮人所謂既慳錢 係咪反而將啲錢洗得唔抵？
Guniqlo
212 回覆
1459 Like
60 Dislike
錢係慳返黎定賺返黎？ 月薪固定嘅你點慳都有限
要搵到更多錢首要條件要唔好生仔一車車傻鳩錢又唔係搵得多
又要比好撚多支出，一放工就要湊仔
想上進想打多份保安番工訓都難
屌你老母guniqlo 六尺正氣男
重複又重複 屌你老母
死毒撚 屌你老母趁地淋啦含家產
重複又重複 屌你老母
死毒撚 屌你老母趁地淋啦含家產
拉
有無教路
拉
講死都驚？
死返匡智穿筷子
死返匡智穿筷子
你講既唔係 唔啱
但我老母打份中收入既工
連連登仔fg都無
又真係慳慳下 慳左層樓返黎
開冷氣又唔一定睡眠質素好（都照樣可以失眠）
唔開又唔一定會好差
醫生我睇開私家
但話你知 無事都叫你覆多次診
最好做多啲檢查
佢地都係為搵錢
你睇開街鋪既快快睇完 佢又咪為左睇多幾個
仲有買衫個句最撚on9
你可以平時全部衫淘寶
但有套度身貴既西裝見工
但我老母打份中收入既工
連連登仔fg都無
又真係慳慳下 慳左層樓返黎
開冷氣又唔一定睡眠質素好（都照樣可以失眠）
唔開又唔一定會好差
醫生我睇開私家
但話你知 無事都叫你覆多次診
最好做多啲檢查
佢地都係為搵錢
你睇開街鋪既快快睇完 佢又咪為左睇多幾個
仲有買衫個句最撚on9
你可以平時全部衫淘寶
但有套度身貴既西裝見工
搵到少點慳都無用，呢d真係窮人思想
好多時風險管理下冇得唔慳,
一唔慳一出意見就承受唔到.
呢個世界冇如果,
你而家只係拎緊而家既劇本黎解讀過去,
當你唔慳仆左街到時又另一套講法.
簡單D講你等同叫人咪鬼做定期,
借盡孖展最低位做好最高位做淡冇咩分別.
一唔慳一出意見就承受唔到.
呢個世界冇如果,
你而家只係拎緊而家既劇本黎解讀過去,
當你唔慳仆左街到時又另一套講法.
簡單D講你等同叫人咪鬼做定期,
借盡孖展最低位做好最高位做淡冇咩分別.
拉
Push
又重複
Boots Theory of socioeconomic unfairness
“The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles. But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet. This was the Captain Samuel Vimes "Boots" theory of socioeconomic unfairness.”
簡單來講就係窮人買嘢嘅時候，因為會貪平而忽略咗考慮質素，從而令到喺長線購買同一產品開支多咗。
“The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles. But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet. This was the Captain Samuel Vimes "Boots" theory of socioeconomic unfairness.”
簡單來講就係窮人買嘢嘅時候，因為會貪平而忽略咗考慮質素，從而令到喺長線購買同一產品開支多咗。
你推到咁極端有咩好講啫
1 開冷氣開到夠涼就夠，唔通要下下要學連登班反環保膠咁開到10度8度先開心咩
2 小病，如感冒喉嚨痛，緊係買藥算啦，唔通下下走去私院俾幾舊水買同一款藥咩
3 大撚把人淘寶買衫，冇人見工都著穿窿衫咩，唔通下下要俾幾舊水買名牌咩
1 開冷氣開到夠涼就夠，唔通要下下要學連登班反環保膠咁開到10度8度先開心咩
2 小病，如感冒喉嚨痛，緊係買藥算啦，唔通下下走去私院俾幾舊水買同一款藥咩
3 大撚把人淘寶買衫，冇人見工都著穿窿衫咩，唔通下下要俾幾舊水買名牌咩