因為論文係教會大學嘅人寫所以唔算數

有證據都唔準用, 你玩晒啦

Equus bone係350+-30年前未即係cover到600 BC囉. 即係你一定要搵到600BC先準計? 咁樣考古真係笑出嚟

仲有呢啲係2022發表嘅新發現嚟, 確認新發現推翻舊觀念係要時間同埋證實, 同你9up唔同, 人哋真係考古會寫得好小心, more research is always needed. 同埋呢句你理解唔到嘅Absence of Evidence does not mean Evidence of Absence都係重點嚟. 你根本就唔知美洲考古面對緊幾多挑戰同埋發掘要用幾多時間. 真係你喺到廢up就當成個美洲都已經完成所有考古發現咁.
我qoute啲網係因為方便, 已經有教會學者整理好晒,
如果你有click過入去, 就會知有晒reference. 但睇死你無click過入去就9up, 你單純因為係教會學者就拒絕證據, 我話係證據先證據咁就收收皮先.
The Texas Journal of Science is a peer reviewed academic journal covering all areas of basic and applied sciences, as well as science education. It is published by the Texas Academy of Science. 唔緊要, 你要嘈總搵到嘢嘈. 事實上人哋就係publish咗喺peer reviewed academic journal. 咁你又可以拗佢排名唔夠高. 任你吹.
我就係明知你會講200年前左右14歲女仔consent唔算數, 所以post埋佢大咗寫嘅書, 當然毫不意外你完全無視佢寫啲咩繼續9 up. 真係為反而反, 唔係講證據. on9仔對證據嘅認知的確係on9.
你繼續9up, 繼續活喺自己世界信我哋邪. 但睇返你講咁多考古, 你當然係無回應過聖經都提到有鋼. 拎住考古學話因為搵唔到 (again... Absence of Evidence does not mean Evidence of Absence) 考古證據就邪. 咁所有信聖經都邪啦. 根本你就無一個標準. 唯我主義討論就算數啦你.