gabler講黎講去就淨係得elie vote
lay low 係一個strategy, 但唔可以low到去到FTC都冇乜人當係threat
survivor 最難就係maintain threat level 但同時可以入到final 3, 呢樣係cassidy做到
點睇得出threat level, 你睇由merge開始咩人比人target得多就知, cass由merge後就keep住俾人當係threat (唔係最大) 而入到final 3, 然後因為ftc表現唔夠gabler就得1票?

都係果句, 我唔覺gabler玩得好差, 可能佢好多social game冇show出黎, 但同時間佢lay得太low,FTC前都冇人覺得佢贏, 冇人覺得佢係threat, 你所講既jury management只係因為佢唔參與太多, 唔係佢特別sway vote, 影響jury 票源
反而你講jesse cody karla, 如果入到final 3 就真係佢地贏既, 但佢地就係入唔到, 所以gabler 贏佢地輸我係冇意見, survivor從來難既都唔係make move, 最難係make move/control vote/being a threat但又入到F3, 入唔到就冇得講
其實連parv都撐cassidy, fishbach/sophie冇講撐邊個好似, 但你睇下邊個tweet, bitter jury係一定有
https://twitter.com/stephenfishbach/status/1603468810325004315?s=20&t=ngIYHtnuWgpEixw5nf1p_Q
gabler唯一贏既只有FTC