[突發]俄羅斯飛彈擊中波蘭
薄荷灰
926 回覆
810 Like
18 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁
真心係日文嚟㗎？ 🤣淨係咁啱波蘭文個音字咋？
布丁狗實會話係烏克蘭射架啦，反而重點係波蘭夠唔夠硬
其實可以點樣證實粒彈係由俄羅斯射？
雷達圖？如果俄羅斯死口唔認又可以點？
就算喺波蘭搵到啲殘骸佢都可以話你做假
雷達圖？如果俄羅斯死口唔認又可以點？
就算喺波蘭搵到啲殘骸佢都可以話你做假
不用分那麼細，德法兩個都係仆街閪國嚟
嗰套系統，而家剩係得烏克蘭同俄羅斯有用
所以好多人想屈係烏克蘭射去波蘭 CLS
今次支那同班藍屍又點解釋
policja
契弟加速師準備攻台！老翻偷襲珍珠港！
係煙幕
成個天空間諜衞星
ww3
死得個2 個
波蘭： 下次唔好啦 今次就由佢
波蘭： 下次唔好啦 今次就由佢
而家咁都幾肯定射核彈係截唔到
Sky news
An emergency meeting has been called by leaders amid fears Russian missiles struck NATO member Poland, amid a "massive" barrage of airstrikes across Ukraine; sources suggest the country is set to trigger the alliance's Article 4; Warsaw "raising readiness of military units".
An emergency meeting has been called by leaders amid fears Russian missiles struck NATO member Poland, amid a "massive" barrage of airstrikes across Ukraine; sources suggest the country is set to trigger the alliance's Article 4; Warsaw "raising readiness of military units".
香港國歌單嘢起馬玩多兩三日先啦
Sky News
NATO ambassadors will meet tomorrow at the request of Poland on basis of the alliance's Article 4, two European diplomats have told Reuters news agency.
According to Article 4 of the alliance's founding treaty, members can raise any issue of concern, especially related to the security of a member country.
One of the diplomats said NATO would act cautiously and needed time to verify how exactly the incident happened.
If this is the case, it would confirm the consensus among a number of experts who suggested it was unlikely that the alliance would opt to invoke of Article 5 - which would likely involve a direct retaliatory military strike on Russia, and a major escalation and widening of the conflict
NATO ambassadors will meet tomorrow at the request of Poland on basis of the alliance's Article 4, two European diplomats have told Reuters news agency.
According to Article 4 of the alliance's founding treaty, members can raise any issue of concern, especially related to the security of a member country.
One of the diplomats said NATO would act cautiously and needed time to verify how exactly the incident happened.
If this is the case, it would confirm the consensus among a number of experts who suggested it was unlikely that the alliance would opt to invoke of Article 5 - which would likely involve a direct retaliatory military strike on Russia, and a major escalation and widening of the conflict
哦 …
No deployment of military force = bullshit
No deployment of military force = bullshit
北韓 伊朗果d可能有殘體字印係粒飛彈到
其實核彈係冇攔截嘅意義
因為你攔唔攔截都係咁
因為你攔唔攔截都係咁
其實都係睇美帝頭
佢叫你去馬 就可以郁手
佢叫你去馬 就可以郁手
點解呢
爆位都唔同
爆位都唔同