twitter連美國眾議院都屏蔽處理！

所羅門之(gakki)

266 回覆

858 Like 13 Dislike

痾屎總要在雨天 2020-10-16 02:47:20

係時候搵人另起爐灶啦呢啲paltform一啲都唔難build

畫沙 2020-10-16 02:48:10

難係唔難難既係點樣吸引用戶

格雷的五十杯奶茶 2020-10-16 02:48:16

好撚癲，準備開戰

黑山羊之卵 2020-10-16 02:48:26

https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1316811342477758470?s=20

byebye fb twitter

金罐頭 2020-10-16 02:51:00

支那連美國社交媒體都控制埋
美國人睇清楚未？

勿通膠類 2020-10-16 02:51:59

重有第二批電郵，有中國公司，所以好奇，今晚19重夠膽講單野

睇唔到車尾燈 2020-10-16 02:52:16

https://lihkg.com/thread/2244825/page/1

睇清楚兩黨同左媒形勢，就應該做實事, 背水一戰

支那豚肉 2020-10-16 02:53:08

中國有份就變o左冇自由

勿通膠類 2020-10-16 02:53:08

變咗同中共一樣

轉身射個卅分波 2020-10-16 02:54:23

封鎖

唯讀光碟 2020-10-16 03:00:11

即係點??

韋拿踢法似我 2020-10-16 03:05:59

Sky_Croc 2020-10-16 03:08:49

Wa diu

Will Chamberlain
@willchamberlain
·
17h
Donald Trump's tax returns were leaked unlawfully, and they were amplified by Twitter

Hunter Biden's emails were acquired lawfully, and they were censored by Twitter
810
32.3K
78.5K

Sky_Croc 2020-10-16 03:09:42

Section 230 says that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider" (47 U.S.C. § 230). In other words, online intermediaries that host or republish speech are protected against a range of laws that might otherwise be used to hold them legally responsible for what others say and do. The protected intermediaries include not only regular Internet Service Providers (ISPs), but also a range of "interactive computer service providers," including basically any online service that publishes third-party content. Though there are important exceptions for certain criminal and intellectual property-based claims, CDA 230 creates a broad protection that has allowed innovation and free speech online to flourish.

Source:
https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230

若然屬實(撐拜燈) 2020-10-16 03:10:13

越顛越好，另一種加速

花莖不曾緣客掃 2020-10-16 03:10:50

兩日都唔夠twitter就已經露底現形瘋狂加速