因爲Dr Yan原本upload去Zenodo，但係Zenodo已經俾人轟炸到死server
而家backup咗上Internet Archive，應該頂得住：
https://archive.org/details/the-yan-report
嚴麗夢博士篇論文我backup咗上archive.org
高學歷廢青
333 回覆
925 Like
6 Dislike
Push
記者backup!
Cap 埋圖出黎
其實篇論文講咩?
back up
back up
留名睇文
呢啲係咪要publish 去journal先有認受性？
利申：唔係呢行
利申：唔係呢行
so? trump咪又扮唔知繼續同biden玩選戰
推 最好留cap 圖係唔同地方 愈多人有愈好
so fa mi re do~
Push
Chinese virus
我pccw好正常喎 重特登上多次去睇重下載到
係咪你地自己isp block左個網呀
係咪你地自己isp block左個網呀
地球聯合軍幾時打支耶那
In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and literature evidence, which, when
considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-
2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template
and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2,
demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in
approximately six months. Our work emphasizes the need for an independent investigation into the
relevant research laboratories. It also argues for a critical look into certain recently published data, which,
albeit problematic, was used to support and claim a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. From a public health
perspective, these actions are necessary as knowledge of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and of how the virus
entered the human population are of pivotal importance in the fundamental control of the COVID-19
pandemic as well as in preventing similar, future pandemics.
considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-
2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template
and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2,
demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in
approximately six months. Our work emphasizes the need for an independent investigation into the
relevant research laboratories. It also argues for a critical look into certain recently published data, which,
albeit problematic, was used to support and claim a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. From a public health
perspective, these actions are necessary as knowledge of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and of how the virus
entered the human population are of pivotal importance in the fundamental control of the COVID-19
pandemic as well as in preventing similar, future pandemics.
推
推