26歲警隊男文員被捕 涉討論區上載內部文件

咁樣要停職 用電單車殺人就唔洗

26歲又做分析/編碼工作，又無刑責，加上呢個時勢大把藉口點解無ref letter, 努力啲一定大把世界。去啱某啲公司或教育機構做IT 不知幾爽。

Btw呢個係謝振中舊post舊名

巴打？

文員應該係，非狗

咪就係

該條文的文本包括「取用」一詞。此詞意指在未獲授權的情況下使用電腦的情況。該詞與使用自己的設備的情況，格格不相入。

文意則包括由《電腦罪行條例》（1993年第23號條例）所修訂的多項法例，當中訂立了一些新罪行，以及擴大了一些現有罪行的涵蓋範圍。其他由《電腦罪行條例》訂立的條文在界定有關罪行時，提述的都是使用或誤用不屬於犯罪者本人的電腦。

至於目的，從立法會參考資料摘要中可清楚看到，該條文的目的是訂立一條不誠實取用電腦的新罪行，以致任何人如懷有相關意圖而「獲取電腦以使用」，即屬違法。

Section 11 of the Theft Ordinance (Cap 210), relating to burglary was amended by adding a new interpretive provision (s 11(3A)) in the following terms:

“The reference in subsection (2)(c) to doing unlawful damage to anything in a building includes—

(a) unlawfully causing a computer in the building to function other than as it has been established by or on behalf of its owner to function, notwithstanding that the unlawful action may not impair the operation of the computer or a program held in the computer or the reliability of data held in the computer;

(b) unlawfully altering or erasing any program, or data, held in a computer in the building or in a computer storage medium in the building; and

(c) unlawfully adding any program or data to the contents of a computer in the building or a computer storage medium in the building.”

仆街

巴打

手足

唔係話連登伺服器喺海外咩?
連仔篤灰?

狗黎