一季13球, 絕對有更好選擇啦, 沙拿文尼又唔係入得波多, 都係15球-20球左右
唔似你咁果兩個人一季40幾球
Football Manager 2020 討論區 (6)
共產猶太人
1001 回覆
2 Like
0 Dislike
但係game入面拉唔到
一季13球, 絕對有更好選擇啦, 沙拿文尼又唔係入得波多, 都係15球-20球左右
唔似你咁果兩個人一季40幾球
一季13球, 絕對有更好選擇啦, 沙拿文尼又唔係入得波多, 都係15球-20球左右
唔似你咁果兩個人一季40幾球
唔太關人事喎
我個打法兩翼冇咁多波入
雙翼雙閘都係出地波俾前鋒同兩隻後上中場
如果你都咁踢肺癆都應該多好多波入
我個打法兩翼冇咁多波入
雙翼雙閘都係出地波俾前鋒同兩隻後上中場
如果你都咁踢肺癆都應該多好多波入
沙拿文尼set做內鋒策應? 做地波俾費明奴?
唔好咁攪呱, 佢兩個本身都唔係多波入, 賽季都入唔夠15球
唔好咁攪呱, 佢兩個本身都唔係多波入, 賽季都入唔夠15球
咁又係隊波人腳唔同
我隊車就啱呢啲
我隊車就啱呢啲
所以都係賣左費明奴算,唔識set, 反正你地都話game engine問題, 前鋒一定要一個跑狗射術高
咁我唔再練射門[sosa
Todibo同Tonali好好用
簽d 17歲新星佢要100K人工，仲要試過另外兩三個都係咁，想問係正常定係bug?
請問點樣可以搵個樂意打後備嘅前鋒？
換過兩個前鋒都係成日不滿上場時間
但唔想要幻幻
換過兩個前鋒都係成日不滿上場時間
但唔想要幻幻
係咪非歐盟要拎工作證既幼幼?
佢開咁高人工係因為佢想直接拎到工作證
佢開咁高人工係因為佢想直接拎到工作證
重要兩隻都係一開game又平兩季後就打到一線水平
簽約個陣直接傾輔助球員/搵d老野、棄將
請問可以想搵球員時，直接搵到依d球員嗎？
係呀巴西阿根廷人
咁有冇方法低d人工簽？等到佢有國際賽踢先？
咁有冇方法低d人工簽？
等到佢有國際賽踢先？如果你in charge指派球探，可以係佢地mission個度set，根據條件搵後備球員
如果唔in charge，可以就咁用短期重點搵d 3星左右能力既人，評價60+就可以
如果唔in charge，可以就咁用短期重點搵d 3星左右能力既人，評價60+就可以
你可以睇睇愛華頓個Kean，佢d數值唔差，又後生
我個save係玩愛華頓，一開波已經係邊緣球員
玩咗6季，同佢續過2次約，2次都自願做邊緣球員
我個save係玩愛華頓，一開波已經係邊緣球員
玩咗6季，同佢續過2次約，2次都自願做邊緣球員
你真係想要既 唯有等佢成名再簽
我通常見到呢啲果斷放棄
你要等佢入到國家隊 仲要穩定入選 即係已成名
預期等咁耐 揀過第個幼幼去train好過
我通常見到呢啲果斷放棄
你要等佢入到國家隊 仲要穩定入選 即係已成名
預期等咁耐 揀過第個幼幼去train好過
點set
我d翼唔撚識傳波
我d翼唔撚識傳波我係抄哥迪奧拿
兩翼打IW拉空俾兩閘打wing back overlap
兩翼兩閘instruction加1. cross more often 2. cross from deep 3. stay wider
中間兩隻中場move into channels get further forward
兩翼打IW拉空俾兩閘打wing back overlap
兩翼兩閘instruction加1. cross more often 2. cross from deep 3. stay wider
中間兩隻中場move into channels get further forward
Copy by favebook
有必要解釋一回事
電腦係唔會去所謂嘅「破解」你嘅戰術嘅，呢一點Neil Brock已經解釋過，但係電腦會依據你隊球隊嘅狀態同喺積分榜嘅位置去調整佢哋嘅戰術
"The AI does not 'work out tactics'. What can sometimes change tactically is that AI teams depending on your own club's league table position and form, will look at you differently. For instance, if you're say a team like say Bournemouth in the Premier League, a large number of teams, certainly in the top 8 will look at them and consider their own team to be stronger. Because of this they're likely to play attacking formations. Mid-table sides likewise will realise they're stronger on paper and again will attack, but may take a slightly more cautious approach when they're the away team. Lower ranked Premier teams will likely play a balanced formation home and away.
Then let's say by January in your first season, Bournemouth are 5th in the table and have won impressive victories. The AI managers will look at this and realise you shouldn't be underestimated. Teams will be more likely to play a defensive counter based style when coming to play at Bournemouth and be more balanced overall.
Mid and certainly lower sides in the table will play defensively. This means a tactic you had working fine for the entire system is suddenly playing against totally different tactics than in the first half of the season. Many human managers assume that if their tactic is working there's never a need to change it, but fail to take into account the fact the AI will adapt as the season goes on. Tactics however, as said above are not individually 'worked out'.
"Why should i have to change things after so many games?... If it's not broke, why fix it?"
A manager has to realise they will need to adapt and improve their squad as time goes on. You can't just plug in a tactic, press continue and expect to win every game. The user already has a pretty large advantage over the AI when it comes to squad building (as simply the AI is never going to have as many options or be as smart as the user until we make huge technological advances in AI), but you can't expect one tactic to work against every combination of team and setup."
點解好多人會覺得第二季好難，咁係因為你第一季個成績好，電腦會相應地去調整自己嘅戰術，例如打得保守啲咁，但電腦係絕對唔會所謂嘅「破解」你嘅戰術
有必要解釋一回事
電腦係唔會去所謂嘅「破解」你嘅戰術嘅，呢一點Neil Brock已經解釋過，但係電腦會依據你隊球隊嘅狀態同喺積分榜嘅位置去調整佢哋嘅戰術
"The AI does not 'work out tactics'. What can sometimes change tactically is that AI teams depending on your own club's league table position and form, will look at you differently. For instance, if you're say a team like say Bournemouth in the Premier League, a large number of teams, certainly in the top 8 will look at them and consider their own team to be stronger. Because of this they're likely to play attacking formations. Mid-table sides likewise will realise they're stronger on paper and again will attack, but may take a slightly more cautious approach when they're the away team. Lower ranked Premier teams will likely play a balanced formation home and away.
Then let's say by January in your first season, Bournemouth are 5th in the table and have won impressive victories. The AI managers will look at this and realise you shouldn't be underestimated. Teams will be more likely to play a defensive counter based style when coming to play at Bournemouth and be more balanced overall.
Mid and certainly lower sides in the table will play defensively. This means a tactic you had working fine for the entire system is suddenly playing against totally different tactics than in the first half of the season. Many human managers assume that if their tactic is working there's never a need to change it, but fail to take into account the fact the AI will adapt as the season goes on. Tactics however, as said above are not individually 'worked out'.
"Why should i have to change things after so many games?... If it's not broke, why fix it?"
A manager has to realise they will need to adapt and improve their squad as time goes on. You can't just plug in a tactic, press continue and expect to win every game. The user already has a pretty large advantage over the AI when it comes to squad building (as simply the AI is never going to have as many options or be as smart as the user until we make huge technological advances in AI), but you can't expect one tactic to work against every combination of team and setup."
點解好多人會覺得第二季好難，咁係因為你第一季個成績好，電腦會相應地去調整自己嘅戰術，例如打得保守啲咁，但電腦係絕對唔會所謂嘅「破解」你嘅戰術
咁同一次性付款有咩分別?
講錯左, 係最多可以分期3年
例如一個人3000萬,分期3年,
就會係未來三季裡既每一季可用轉會費倒扣一千萬, 直到俾晒錢為止
例如一個人3000萬,分期3年,
就會係未來三季裡既每一季可用轉會費倒扣一千萬, 直到俾晒錢為止
明白, 唔該哂
ps, 幾年無過隻FM, 完全同我當年玩嘅唔一樣
ps, 幾年無過隻FM, 完全同我當年玩嘅唔一樣
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/gaming/liverpool-football-manager-2020-tactic-17966821
呢個網講利物浦跟高普戰術應該點SET每個球員既角色, 仲會講解點解會咁SET, 佢話費明奴應該SET做假9, 回落去中場吸引後衛, 俾空位沙拿文尼後上, 會符合現實情況, 有冇人睇下個網係咪講得岩
呢個網講利物浦跟高普戰術應該點SET每個球員既角色, 仲會講解點解會咁SET, 佢話費明奴應該SET做假9, 回落去中場吸引後衛, 俾空位沙拿文尼後上, 會符合現實情況, 有冇人睇下個網係咪講得岩
Ching...想問下夏維斯好用定格列殊好用D?