demand 係 countable, 用 less 係唔完美, 但可以接受
至於no one less VS not one less
no one less 有好多解法, 因為one 係一個代名詞
唔係一定要連埋no one (無人) 黎睇
我地睇返 air supply 首two less lonely people in the world 會明
佢成句解
直譯: 兩個少咗孤獨的人世界上
重組: 世界上少咗兩個孤獨的人
即係 one less / two less 呢種用法係講少咗幾多個既意思
再睇個 "no", 呢個字一定係跟noun, 解唔要一樣野
呢個處景,樣野就係 "one less "
所以成句就係: no (唔要) one less (n. 少咗一個)
Not one less
成句睇睇先
Not (不) one less (n. 少咗一個) 睇唔明呀
如果加一句呢
I want accepting 5 demands, not one less.
(我要求答應5個訴求, 而唔係答應少1個)
睇 "not" 呢係一定要跟verb, 但成句都冇verb 喎ching.
佢係收埋咗咋, 要加返accept 先明
Not (不) accept (v. 接受) one less (n. 少咗一個)
結論, 其實grammar 上唔可以話某一個錯, 不過兩句個前設唔同
如果講直白, 我一定會揀No one less
起碼本身可以獨立存在, 唔使腦補一句 SVO