政府港鐵聯合記招　交代太子站8.31事件即時討論區

跟據Data Privacy Ordinance Section 61(2):

如果就咁解讀既話，黨鐵係可以disclose CCTV 俾傳媒， given this is undoubtedly public interest. 唔存在私隱條例所以唔公開既説法

有冇私隱專材可以confirm?


(1)Personal data held by a data user—
(a)whose business, or part of whose business, consists of a news activity; and
(b)solely for the purpose of that activity (or any directly related activity),
is exempt from the provisions of— (Amended 18 of 2012 s. 2)
(i)data protection principle 6 and sections 18(1)(b) and 38(i) unless and until the data is published or broadcast (wherever and by whatever means);
(ii)sections 36 and 38(b).
(2)Personal data is exempt from the provisions of data protection principle 3 in any case in which— (Amended 18 of 2012 s. 2)
(a)the use of the data consists of disclosing the data to a data user referred to in subsection (1); and
(b)such disclosure is made by a person who has reasonable grounds to believe (and reasonably believes) that the publishing or broadcasting (wherever and by whatever means) of the data (and whether or not it is published or broadcast) is in the public interest.

唔公開CCTV 互相包庇！
元朗站白衣暴徒就公開
太子黑警暴徒打人就唔公開

有大量片段影到示威者就範之後，警員依然施暴，咁係定唔係叫停止武力

立場問到兩條

昇哥

昇哥again

昇哥

播cctv 睇返d 警犬點打人先講

立場

生要見人 死要見屍
冇cctv片 一齊都係廢話

36小時封場夠化幾次
state-supported

繼續問
打到眾多示威人士危殆，係警方指引中係定唔係屬於適當武力

昇哥一野落曬狗面

當新聞自由同私隱權有衝突時，假如該私隱與公眾利益有關時，就應公開班人仲無知過中學生

立場記者

岩岩miss左 昇哥問咩

昇哥好撚型

無片無說服力 而家就係要佢證明自己無罪

我諗唔係無知，係無恥