精神科藥 究竟係咪會傷害腦細胞？

愈食愈蠢 有d話會造成腦細胞永久損害
究竟係咪真？

咩藥先，SSRI, SNRI, TCA 呢d antidepressant，定係schizophrenia 既antipsychotics，定係講緊methylphenidate 呢d stimulant 精神科藥呢個term 太概括啦

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476840/

Viewed together with data from animal studies, our study suggests that antipsychotics have a subtle but measurable influence on brain tissue loss over time, suggesting the importance of careful risk-benefit review of dosage and duration of treatment as well as their off-label use.

有無Psy巴打絲打分享下現時主流係點睇

抗精神分裂藥

推

唔會
基本上唔食個後果好大 唔好畏疾忌醫 錯過左最重要的頭五年
通常唔食 都係覺得自己無病無需要 但要知道一反發以後一世玩完 可以參考下

唔會
基本上唔食個後果好大 唔好畏疾忌醫 錯過左最重要的頭五年
通常唔食 都係覺得自己無病無需要 但要知道一反發以後一世玩完 可以參考下

頭五年係做咩？？

唔會
基本上唔食個後果好大 唔好畏疾忌醫 錯過左最重要的頭五年
通常唔食 都係覺得自己無病無需要 但要知道一反發以後一世玩完 可以參考下

頭五年係做咩？？

Keep住食藥 頭五年反發次數越多 prognosis越差

Drugs from Psychiatry is just another Monsanto

即係點呀？

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476840/

Viewed together with data from animal studies, our study suggests that antipsychotics have a subtle but measurable influence on brain tissue loss over time, suggesting the importance of careful risk-benefit review of dosage and duration of treatment as well as their off-label use.

有無Psy巴打絲打分享下現時主流係點睇

唔係medic 會清楚d咩
主流好似話有左依賴性要愈食愈多之得會冇效
(好似係

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476840/

Viewed together with data from animal studies, our study suggests that antipsychotics have a subtle but measurable influence on brain tissue loss over time, suggesting the importance of careful risk-benefit review of dosage and duration of treatment as well as their off-label use.

有無Psy巴打絲打分享下現時主流係點睇

唔係medic 會清楚d咩
主流好似話有左依賴性要愈食愈多之得會冇效
(好似係

的確係

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476840/

Viewed together with data from animal studies, our study suggests that antipsychotics have a subtle but measurable influence on brain tissue loss over time, suggesting the importance of careful risk-benefit review of dosage and duration of treatment as well as their off-label use.

有無Psy巴打絲打分享下現時主流係點睇

唔係medic 會清楚d咩
主流好似話有左依賴性要愈食愈多之得會冇效
(好似係

有d精神科藥物同毒品既運作機制相似
有機會上癮

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476840/

Viewed together with data from animal studies, our study suggests that antipsychotics have a subtle but measurable influence on brain tissue loss over time, suggesting the importance of careful risk-benefit review of dosage and duration of treatment as well as their off-label use.

有無Psy巴打絲打分享下現時主流係點睇

唔係medic 會清楚d咩
主流好似話有左依賴性要愈食愈多之得會冇效
(好似係

有d精神科藥物同毒品既運作機制相似
有機會上癮

根本有d毒品原本係精神科藥物

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476840/

Viewed together with data from animal studies, our study suggests that antipsychotics have a subtle but measurable influence on brain tissue loss over time, suggesting the importance of careful risk-benefit review of dosage and duration of treatment as well as their off-label use.

有無Psy巴打絲打分享下現時主流係點睇

唔係medic 會清楚d咩
主流好似話有左依賴性要愈食愈多之得會冇效
(好似係

有d精神科藥物同毒品既運作機制相似
有機會上癮

根本有d毒品原本係精神科藥物

依賴性同耐藥性兩樣嘢嚟
依賴性方面除咗benzo(現行主流抗焦慮藥), 多數新型精神科藥物都唔會成癮, 就算生理上產生依賴只要慢慢減藥都可以降低withdrawal symptom出現嘅風險
耐藥性其實都唔多見, 平時見人加藥主要係症狀惡化先加, 或者循序漸進由starter dose加到有效劑量
啲人係見到精神科藥物嘅醫療效果(鎮靜/提振精神(興奮)/提高集中力)先攞嚟濫用, 唔好掉轉講到啲藥物係為咗攞嚟做毒品先研發出嚟

點睇

慢慢你會知道呢d叫命運

毒品其實都係精神科藥物

慢慢你會知道呢d叫命運

點解呀

冇洗睇呢啲，你唔食可唔可以控制到or有其他方法幫你
冇就食藥，堅持到底，冇第二條路

唔會
基本上唔食個後果好大 唔好畏疾忌醫 錯過左最重要的頭五年
通常唔食 都係覺得自己無病無需要 但要知道一反發以後一世玩完 可以參考下

頭五年係做咩？？

Keep住食藥 頭五年反發次數越多 prognosis越差

風巴打 其實醫生開西藥比病人食 病人唔食係有佢個選擇權 但希望有其他有需要的人唔好睇到一d片面的說法/網上文章就令到明明有得好返的人失去左個機會

如果你真心想知更多 就不如查下咩叫病悉感 就知點解咁多精神病人都有各種唔同的原因去唔食藥

比個反例子你 你身邊見過有人腸胃炎睇完醫生會唔食藥 然後搵千萬個理由去合理化?

食左一排fluoxetine，唔覺有變化就冇再食
有咩藥係真係有效減輕強迫症症狀

食左一排fluoxetine，唔覺有變化就冇再食
有咩藥係真係有效減輕強迫症症狀

OCD本來靠藥就唔得
心理治療一齊做先更加有效

就算傷腦，仲有咩辦法吖
本身有精神病個腦都係傷，冇咩分別掛

就算傷腦，仲有咩辦法吖
本身有精神病個腦都係傷，冇咩分別掛

有啲精神病e.g.重症抑鬱, 精神分裂, 有食藥同無食藥可以係"傷腦"同"自殺/傷人/一世住青山"嘅分別

更何況"傷腦"都未必真係有醫學根據(雖然我都冇去搵資料), 有時感覺遲鈍咗其實係藥物穩定咗腦分泌令個腦唔再係咁轉, 思考冇咁飛躍(最明顯例子係ADHD患者), 或者改善情緒, 個人易啲開心感覺冇咁"冷靜"/看破紅塵(呢種通常係抑鬱/bipolar患者)