返工返到比人吿

大返佢恐嚇

想知點解?

有把靠我都會同人講完再發，吹咩

佢咁想樓主死
真係告到誹謗仲會講出黎俾機會樓主縮？
緊係靜靜雞等樓主搞落去再告鳩佢啦

如果道理係你嗰邊 驚閪咩
Reply番佢：睇下邊個笑到最後？

記得要留低啲證據

其實喱啲通常點賠同賠到幾多？

推 我都想知評估準則係點

無錯，要玩就玩大佢，睇下邊個仆街，玩到成間公司都要因為呢條友上平機會上法庭。

任何人只要俾錢都可以叫個律師出封信
十居其九只係靠嚇

Fd就唔洗收錢咩
睇劇就唔洗

誹謗炸？仲要係私人名義出
驚鳩咩

唔洗覆
等佢封信嚟

但佢亦有多次言談間提到唔鍾意同女人工作。


搵平機會攪攪佢先

你比人告強姦，就算告唔入都已經玩撚完。

佢上司咁玩法其實好弱智

真心去政府睇醫生話近排訓唔著，有情緒問題，原因係公司
到時可以告返佢轉頭

On this, i can chime in.

HK does not have its own case law in tort of harrassment.

But it has changed since Lau Tat Wai v Yip Lai Kuen [2013] 2 HKLRD 1197.

Anthony Chan J awarded Lau (P) ----the victim being harrassed by Yip (D) for 4 years----aggregate damages in the amount of $600k for suffering in feelings, dignity, pride, mental discomfort and distress, plus $200k for exemplary damage made in relation to deterring the culprit from harrassing anybody in future. There was special damage and injunction awarded too. Usually, special damage compensates for lost wages/earning capacity, medical expenses, etc. But each case is measured based on its own facts.

Another case is Lin Man Yuan v Kin Ming Holdings International Ltd [2015] HKC 1012, which considered the above case when awarding damages. In the end: an aggregate damage of $300k and an exemplary damage of $150k were awarded.

Tort of harrassment remains a nebulous area of law. That means HK courts are not so inclined to find a cause of action under this heading, given that there is no guiding principle for establishing such cases.

thanks bro. Very detailed

真 可能睇太多tvb

睇精神科先
所有wtsapp keep 紀錄
不過公司email 應該無得keep?(公司財產）

然後主動搵勞工處開file

呢單野實有得賠

玩撚返佢轉頭

希望勞工處真係幫到打工仔，唔會偏幫雇主

佢呢種人，一味靠嚇，以為自己好醒

真係以為個個都會就此屈服

出左信先開writ = 正式俾機會你回應
直接開writ，你可以拗唔知頭唔知路對方突然告我，對個costs可以有影響