邊個發明“gender“呢個概念

我唔係左膠但係我好想擺脫gender呢個枷鎖。

點解個social construct/morality係要一男一女喺一齊先叫正常，其他LGBTQ+就叫“性小眾“呢？

講開“性小眾“呢個noun仲火滾，好地地做咩要specify為“小眾“， shouldn't all of us be part of the norm instead of alienating ourselves as part of a minority?

Of course, being normal is boring.

計stat咪知點樣係多數點樣係少數

用male/female代替囉

On9 大眾小眾明明係客觀數字
你話60:40就話有得拗啫
90:10點會唔係小眾呀屌你老母

人數佔得少的叫minority 有咩問題
定係LGBTQ 的人咁玻璃心？

少數族裔係咪又係歧視

個point係既然大家都意會到係minority又點解要label為小眾呢？

lol moreover我覺得「認定自己100%直」嘅人先係小眾，一世人流流長點都有啲“能成為密友大概總帶着愛“嘅moment呱。又可能係因為gender嘅概念扼殺咗呢啲浪漫嘅念頭/漣漪。

你又啱，所以我好唔鐘意“貧窮線“，“基層市民“呢啲字眼，好似label咗某group人咁

我明係小眾，個point係點解要point out as “性小眾“啊...

咁自稱自己做任何野，都係一種labelling
交稅計累進稅率果時，你會唔會又話，點解要label 我係低人工果班，我要交最高級別果個percentage

咁交稅累進制嘅labelling, i.e. hk$income bracket, 嘅negative connotation 無“性小眾“咁強啩

有無睇過精神科

你覺得啫

點睇都係低收入侮辱啲

樓主中二病...

用數據描述事實=label?

不如你講下無惡意嘅label有咩問題先

Label本質根本係中性
玻璃心嘅小眾咪覺得俾人歧視囉

maid vs. domestic helper

air hostess vs. flight attendant

nigger vs. African American

可見啲 connotation/attitude attributed to a label itself係由措辭build up㗎嘛

唔係發明
係發現
係因為人觀察到現實係咁
再將佢歸納出黎
識分未？

不如你直接講關你事既就覺得歧視算數啦

又未去到話歧視嘅，只不過係用個term嗰個始祖有無consider過LGBTQ+或許想blend in (被接納) rather than being alienated as a minority?

樓主一係les一係gay

你地要去搞到立立亂冇所謂 唔好又平埋d咩福利權 你地自己一pair有撚人去理你地咩
你去做冇所謂 你有你自由 但唔好迫人去接受你地個套

gender普通英文字又俾你過份解讀 就黎同咩women又屌d女權一樣

仲有大眾小眾都俾你話 term黎姐 又唔啱？咁你地係小眾喎 客觀陳述喎 定想俾人話死gay佬姐

btw 我成世人冇中意過男人 thz 唔好屈埋人講咩能成為密友

唔係淨係人，本來動物生存本能就係想繁衍後代

多數係男+女有咩野問題

我都唔明點解蘋果要叫蘋果，唔可以叫佢做橙

究竟邊個發明蘋果同橙呢兩個字？