美國最高法院大法官金斯伯格病逝　終年87歲

無記錯推論出privacy係靠penumbra呢個概念
然後Clarence Thomas辦公室好似有塊牌係串呢樣嘢

Sotomayor擔大旗

如果唔係BLM LGBT的老鼠屎搞串個Party，點會變左6個conservative，佢地今鋪唔止食屎，仲拖累埋的普通進步派

柒少陣啦
呢個擺明係邊黨上台就任命邊派啦

Ginsburg仲有寫過dissenting opinion，要求限制警權，唔好接納警方違憲獲取嘅證據

不過當時法庭5VS4，決定唔suppress警方證供

唔知反警暴嘅連登仔係咪精神分裂

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg#Search_and_seizure
In Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), Ginsburg dissented from the court's decision not to suppress evidence due to a police officer's failure to update a computer system. In contrast to Roberts' emphasis on suppression as a means to deter police misconduct, Ginsburg took a more robust view on the use of suppression as a remedy for a violation of a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights. Ginsburg viewed suppression as a way to prevent the government from profiting from mistakes, and therefore as a remedy to preserve judicial integrity and respect civil rights.[81]:308 She also rejected Roberts' assertion that suppression would not deter mistakes, contending making police pay a high price for mistakes would encourage them to take greater care.[81]:309

點都會搞侵
只係怕參議院有好大迴響

唔識就唔好亂講啦
咁都拉到去BLM

除非有4個共和黨人走票
不過呢個問題照計冇幾個敢走

你up乜鳩
BLM又關咩事
Clarence Thomas 先係Black Live喎 佢保守個喎
LGBT係靠Anthony Kennedy先搞得起，佢係列根(共和黨總統)委任個喎

你個fallacy在於你認為黑人同LGBT單純係liberal嘅意識形態
過度簡化咗法院組成嘅問題

好難有四票
三票就有機會 （Utah, Alaska, Maine 嘅senators)

所以我咪話
我對Trump連任嘅最大憂慮就係佢主宰Supreme Court委任權

不過聽McConnell咁講
睇怕Trump嘅nominee應該可以趕得切過到Senate
咁就係6-3

兒登仔：唔係香港就是但啦

屌連登好撚多on9小朋友一見到liberal隻字就認定係D死左膠term
真係好弱智

佢咁樣盞令啲中間派投Democrat
有風唔好駛盡

民權倒退

唔緊要
MAGA撚無論點都係打飛機㗎啦；然後繼續幻想deep state阻撓佢哋心愛嘅侵

連登不嬲左右不分

三票唔夠
彭斯有半票
而且Romney呢個問題上只要當撈侵提個正常人佢唔會走啦
你講個到得兩票
仲有機會走照計係Cory Gardner 同Thom Tillis
因為要連任唔可以唔理中間選民

但係佢唔咁就又會畀自己班選民屌喎
當然鐵票就點都係鐵票

佢一定會提名
但參議院班友都有自己盤算

其實仲有一樣野係
共和黨提名D法官好多時老左會走票

真陰公
RBG明明係一個好受美國人歡迎的大法官
而家24小時未過就就己經好似無人記得佢
將佢抱諸腦後
連登真係無嘜血性

或者學啊侵侵話齋
呢D就係Herd Mentality

同意