如果佢唔用非法片源根本就吹佢唔脹
佢唔用非法片源，用預告嘅就唔會有問題，只會係影評，憎唔憎佢就大家主觀意見
谷阿莫挨告！重製非法影片 濃縮電影侵權
HE7601
602 回覆
627 Like
92 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁
佢唔用非法片源，用預告嘅就唔會有問題，只會係影評，憎唔憎佢就大家主觀意見
https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/fair-use.html#yt-copyright-myths
The four factors of fair use
In the United States, fair use is determined by a judge, who analyzes how each of the four factors of fair use applies to a specific case.
1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
Courts typically focus on whether the use is “transformative.” That is, whether it adds new expression or meaning to the original, or whether it merely copies from the original. Commercial uses are less likely to be considered fair, though it’s possible to monetize a video and still take advantage of the fair use defense.
2. The nature of the copyrighted work
Using material from primarily factual works is more likely to be fair than using purely fictional works.
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
Borrowing small bits of material from an original work is more likely to be considered fair use than borrowing large portions. However, even a small taking may weigh against fair use in some situations if it constitutes the “heart” of the work.
4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
Uses that harm the copyright owner’s ability to profit from his or her original work are less likely to be fair uses. Courts have sometimes made an exception under this factor in cases involving parodies.
當然上面都係美帝法律, 中國就唔知啦
而且拉去個webpage 睇返, youtube 似傾向保護原片製作人而唔係佢so called"二次創作"
e.g. "Even if you’ve added a little something of your own to someone else’s content, you might not be able to take advantage of the fair use defense"
當然佢冇define到個little thing係咩, 商榷ge餘地都好大
咁佢呢條片講到話最後都係由法庭判決
"Courts will look carefully at the purpose of your use in evaluating whether it is fair, but the three remaining factors(上述) also need to be considered."
佢拍呢條片為乜唔駛講都知啦
The four factors of fair use
In the United States, fair use is determined by a judge, who analyzes how each of the four factors of fair use applies to a specific case.
1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
Courts typically focus on whether the use is “transformative.” That is, whether it adds new expression or meaning to the original, or whether it merely copies from the original. Commercial uses are less likely to be considered fair, though it’s possible to monetize a video and still take advantage of the fair use defense.
2. The nature of the copyrighted work
Using material from primarily factual works is more likely to be fair than using purely fictional works.
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
Borrowing small bits of material from an original work is more likely to be considered fair use than borrowing large portions. However, even a small taking may weigh against fair use in some situations if it constitutes the “heart” of the work.
4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
Uses that harm the copyright owner’s ability to profit from his or her original work are less likely to be fair uses. Courts have sometimes made an exception under this factor in cases involving parodies.
當然上面都係美帝法律, 中國就唔知啦
而且拉去個webpage 睇返, youtube 似傾向保護原片製作人而唔係佢so called"二次創作"
e.g. "Even if you’ve added a little something of your own to someone else’s content, you might not be able to take advantage of the fair use defense"
當然佢冇define到個little thing係咩, 商榷ge餘地都好大
咁佢呢條片講到話最後都係由法庭判決
"Courts will look carefully at the purpose of your use in evaluating whether it is fair, but the three remaining factors(上述) also need to be considered."
佢拍呢條片為乜唔駛講都知啦
而且呢類controversial topics係連/高登傾都曬氣啦
想認學野可以上網搵資料
係到嘈都唔知為乜
想認學野可以上網搵資料
係到嘈都唔知為乜
自己戇鳩去搵谷阿莫睇就屈人劇透 好似人地逼你睇咁 仲大大聲講侮辱電影 肉酸
呢件垃圾拎網路廿三條黎比痴線
網路廿三條最大問題係「政府可以提告」呀
次次有人屌侵權，就有班傻閪出黎話網絡23條，而佢地一D都唔明點解當日要反網絡23條
抵啊死垃圾
而且呢類controversial topics係連/高登傾都曬氣啦
想認學野可以上網搵資料
係到嘈都唔知為乜
我都有台灣朋友成日去日本網到單人地片幫人地加字幕再dum上自己youtube channel, 唔淨止係佢, 其實真係好多台灣人都會咁大. 美其名咪幫手宣傳啊, 自己都有付出過努力啊, 好老實, 我唔敢實際出黎ge效益大唔大, 但係由一開始咪又係係到偷野
多啦a夢果間好鐘意告人
之前d民間叮噹網都比佢告到執哂
之前d民間叮噹網都比佢告到執哂
我都有台灣朋友成日去日本網到單人地片幫人地加字幕再dum上自己youtube channel, 唔淨止係佢, 其實真係好多台灣人都會咁大. 美其名咪幫手宣傳啊, 自己都有付出過努力啊, 好老實, 我唔敢實際出黎ge效益大唔大, 但係由一開始咪又係係到偷野
真係有心做義工就係原片到加CC字幕喇
Seed呢seed呢
Cinemasins呢
Fair use. Basically it means that you're allowed limited use of copyright materials without acquiring permission in some cases:
Examples of fair use include commentary, search engines, criticism, parody, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship. It provides for the legal, unlicensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author's work under a four-factor balancing test.
copy from https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3ius9b/eli5_how_do_youtube_channels_such_as_cinemasins/
咁即係視乎佢既video內容決定係咪犯法？
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
Borrowing small bits of material from an original work is more likely to be considered fair use than borrowing large portions. However, even a small taking may weigh against fair use in some situations if it constitutes the “heart” of the work.
有冇識英文嘅連登仔幫手睇下？
由頭到尾劇透一次係small bits定large portion？
However, even a small taking may weigh against fair use in some situations if it constitutes the “heart” of the work.
咁樣睇到未?
好奇一問
點解冇人告honest trailers
Trailer wor
睇谷阿莫我慳反人生好多時間唔洗睇啲垃圾
但同時你睇完一啲好嘅電影後
因為你都知道晒劇情 好難叫人再俾錢入去睇
我睇完骨精強都會去搵返原片睇
岩岩睇完佢條六弄咖啡館
好彩無入戲院睇
係呀 冇錯
下 六弄係冇書咁好，但唔會係比佢屌到唔值得入去睇既水平囉。
台仔個個都屌到佢飛起
反而連登咁多人撐
連登有愛
反而連登咁多人撐
連登有愛
根本呢D唔算二次創作囉...