高院裁警有搜令始可查市民手機 警方上訴得直
極速神驅
859 回覆
66 Like
826 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁
終審法院呢？？
笑死
衰過住中國
Dllm
35+否決個任命佢
好坦白講
等23條上埋，我哋就會直接集中營相見
等23條上埋，我哋就會直接集中營相見
法治=??
爆入你手機->插贓嫁禍->???->profit
爆入你手機->插贓嫁禍->???->profit
好嬲呀好嬲呀
走法律罅㗎。。。
立即上訴
捉咗你，收咗機就可以爆
twitter 戰線,同搵個英文好既人開聯署要求制裁紅官啦
捱打
同
俾佢硬開再呈堂係兩回事
同
俾佢硬開再呈堂係兩回事
218. In summary, we hold that the power to conduct a mobile phone search upon arrest can be exercised if:
(a) a warrant is obtained under Section 50(7); or
(b) when it is not reasonably practicable to obtain such warrant before a search is conducted, the police officer must also have a reasonable basis for having to conduct the search immediately as being necessary (i) for the investigation of the offence(s) for which the person was suspected to be involved, including the procurement and preservation of information or evidence connected with such offences; or (ii) for the protection of the safety of persons (including the victim(s) of the crime, members of the public in the vicinity, the arrested person and the police officers at the scene);
(c) for a warrantless search conducted under (b) above, other than a cursory examination for filtering purpose, the scope of the detail examination of the digital contents of a phone should be limited to items relevant to objectives set out in sub-paragraph (b);
(d) in addition, a police officer should make an adequate written record of the purpose and scope of the warrantless search as soon as reasonably practicable after the performance of the search and a copy of the written record should be supplied forthwith to the arrested person unless doing so would jeopardize the ongoing process of criminal investigation.
根據Judgment班狗唔係可以無warrant可以隨便睇電話 仲要符合一堆要求先可以睇架 唔好俾佢地兇到
(a) a warrant is obtained under Section 50(7); or
(b) when it is not reasonably practicable to obtain such warrant before a search is conducted, the police officer must also have a reasonable basis for having to conduct the search immediately as being necessary (i) for the investigation of the offence(s) for which the person was suspected to be involved, including the procurement and preservation of information or evidence connected with such offences; or (ii) for the protection of the safety of persons (including the victim(s) of the crime, members of the public in the vicinity, the arrested person and the police officers at the scene);
(c) for a warrantless search conducted under (b) above, other than a cursory examination for filtering purpose, the scope of the detail examination of the digital contents of a phone should be limited to items relevant to objectives set out in sub-paragraph (b);
(d) in addition, a police officer should make an adequate written record of the purpose and scope of the warrantless search as soon as reasonably practicable after the performance of the search and a copy of the written record should be supplied forthwith to the arrested person unless doing so would jeopardize the ongoing process of criminal investigation.
根據Judgment班狗唔係可以無warrant可以隨便睇電話 仲要符合一堆要求先可以睇架 唔好俾佢地兇到
又bin c
唔係咁既意思
想知道算唔算可以俾班狗屈多條罪je
例子就好似
我係條街路過
以前只會屈非法集結 暴動etc
只係想知道會唔會再多條防疫條例咁
想知道算唔算可以俾班狗屈多條罪je
例子就好似
我係條街路過
以前只會屈非法集結 暴動etc
只係想知道會唔會再多條防疫條例咁
法治
可唔可以做呈堂證供已經差好遠